So is on par with AMD? That is a Conroe Jump.AFAIK somewhere between those lines yes
It is we will get the proof with Lunar lakeSo is on par with AMD? That is a Conroe Jump.
Something that seems fishy?
A lot of these channels are, they fake results. Sometimes is just a guy in Poland that works for a retailer and has the product before anyone else. We’ll know soon enough.Something that seems fishy?
except for the fact that the video actually has evidence and is literally footage of the game running?It's about the equivalent of some random poster making performance claims with no evidence.
Look at the channel. It's all the same form of video. Nothing resembling an independent review at any point. There are dozens of these channels spamming specific part comparisons because people will search for that, being early means you may get some views and amazingly the CPM isn't trash because they were probably comparing two specific laptops with intent to buy. Some of these videos may be real but now after years of this being a problem they should prove it and physically show what laptop it is on each side.except for the fact that the video actually has evidence and is literally footage of the game running?
you know you can ignore all the numbers and just decide for yourself which image looks better right?
I think independent reviews are to be taken with a grain of salt absolutely. One should not take a single video alone on its own sure but that doesn't invalidate multiple results nor does that inherently rule out outliers.
If its really so bad then why are y'all so intent on platforming these people? Why should I click on their video again if their statements are false? Just so they can have more engagement?Look at the channel. It's all the same form of video. Nothing resembling an independent review at any point. There are dozens of these channels spamming specific part comparisons because people search for that and amazingly the CPM isn't trash. Some of these videos may be real but now after years of this being a problem they should prove it and physically show what laptop it is on each side.
This video didn't even divulge the actual devices under test. Most likely fabricated overlays on random game captures.
Or a common mistake/they're part of a brand and cant divulge? Could be faked, but how and why? And why do they get away with it?This video didn't even divulge the actual devices under test. Most likely fabricated overlays on random game captures.
Huh? You lost me. It is the one linked above.If its really so bad then why are y'all so intent on platforming these people? Why should I click on their video again if their statements are false? Just so they can have more engagement?
But what if you're lying?
Who is they, what even is the channel name? You didn't even state it. If they're a true faker it should be trivial to point out and name yeah?
You've totally lost me. You're going to bat for a faked video uploaded by ad squatters on YouTube as if they're genuine people.Or a common mistake/they're part of a brand and cant divulge? Could be faked, but how and why? And why do they get away with it?
And purely thinking in devices is flawed. What if someone buys the worst designed product from vendor A, and coincidentally changes it out with the best product from vendor B? Is their experience now suddenly invalid because OEMs aren't consistent with cooling systems and firmware quality? to an extent yes but its good to have a fuller picture/and or also know who is actually lying about performance on the internet.
You won't even name them let alone try to screenshot proof of anything. You're begging me to believe you instead of direct evidence.You've totally lost me. You're going to bat for a video uploaded by ad squatters on YouTube as if they're genuine people. Haha...
No this is not the state of GPU reviews. This is the absolute state of You.You won't even name them let alone try to screenshot proof of anything. You're begging me to believe you instead of direct evidence.
I am not claiming they're real, but someone forgetting to name a device is hardly evidence of anything. These videos come from indepentent people who probably don't have 20 laptops sitting around waiting to be benchmarked at a moments notice.
Quality will never be 100% in a situation like that and that's why I'm trying to say to you that you should be more thorough in calling these people out for creating fake benchmarks.
And this really is the state of GPU reviews in 2024, I literally don't buy any graphics device now without looking up multiple benchmarks of the applications/games I want to use. And if there is a good battlemage card coming up I'll still have the same criteria.
except for the fact that the video actually has evidence and is literally footage of the game running?
you know you can ignore all the numbers and just decide for yourself which image looks better right?
I think independent reviews are to be taken with a grain of salt absolutely. One should not take a single video alone on its own sure but that doesn't invalidate multiple results nor does that inherently invalidate outliers.
also I do wanna say that I wish people would take screenshots and post those more often instead of making have to click on a video that might be bunko
Sorry for that 😅 i Just wanted to share it but will remember it from next time but anyway if you put screenshot people are gonna complain who is the source so it's better to give the original source it's lot of hardwork for posting content in a form and i am a lazy person 🙂also I do wanna say that I wish people would take screenshots and post those more often instead of making have to click on a video that might be bunko
Pretty much decent... now I can say that is time to RIP the X050 nVIDIA dGPU series.Now real reviews:
At best GPU performance trades blows with AMD integrated 890m. Though power limits, etc, make laptop tests harder to parse.
That earlier video is looking more suspect.
Pretty much decent... now I can say that is time to RIP the X050 nVIDIA dGPU series.
Incredible how iGPU improved massively these last years.
A separate GPU with its own power budget and high bandwidth VRAM is always going to be faster. APUs will only catch up if they have a wider memory bus and higher TDP (like Strix Halo).Not really unless you mean x50 from several generations ago.
This and AMD 890M trade blows with the GTX 1650, so sure, RIP the 1650, but that's a couple of generations old.
Even RTX 3050 sits above them, and that's previous gen, and we have RTX 4050 which is again another step ahead.
Still the iGPU is getting nearer and nearer compared to previous generations.Not really unless you mean x50 from several generations ago.
This and AMD 890M trade blows with the GTX 1650, so sure, RIP the 1650, but that's a couple of generations old.
Even RTX 3050 sits above them, and that's previous gen, and we have RTX 4050 which is again another step ahead.