News Intel GPUs - waiting for B770

[aigomorla]

Sigh... having this much problems before launch...
Imagine the issues that will arise at launch...

Sorry im already leaning on this GPU being a major flop.

 

[uzzi38]

First 3rd party results are in. Loses to the 6400 in all of the games tested. Well that fell considerably below my expectations too :/

Intel Arc A380 desktop GPU is outperformed by Radeon RX 6400 in first independent gaming tests - VideoCardz.com

Intel Arc A380 desktop GPU finally tested Today Intel lifts the review embargo on its first Arc Alchemist desktop graphics cards. Intel Arc A380 GPU test, Source: Shenmedounengce The reviews posted today focus on the GUNNIR A380 Photon graphics card, which is thus far the only custom card based...

videocardz.com

 

[psolord]

Nothing new for Raja. He'll pull through and keep his millions. Real losers will be the ones blamed for everything Raja did wrong.

Guys guys come on, his name is Bali. Let's get on with the times, shall we?

xD

 

[psolord]

First 3rd party results are in. Loses to the 6400 in all of the games tested. Well that fell considerably below my expectations too :/

Intel Arc A380 desktop GPU is outperformed by Radeon RX 6400 in first independent gaming tests - VideoCardz.com

Intel Arc A380 desktop GPU finally tested Today Intel lifts the review embargo on its first Arc Alchemist desktop graphics cards. Intel Arc A380 GPU test, Source: Shenmedounengce The reviews posted today focus on the GUNNIR A380 Photon graphics card, which is thus far the only custom card based...

videocardz.com

Well at least it's faster in RT than AMD's equivalent cards.

This is a correct statement for both Time Spy and Port Royal test. In this ray-tracing test, it scored almost twice as high as AMD Navi 24 GPUs

Also who is that Tom that is raiding?

 

[NTMBK]

Well that's underwhelming.

 

[igor_kavinski]

Well at least it's faster in RT than AMD's equivalent cards.

Good if that performance holds in every RT title.

 

[igor_kavinski]

Well that's underwhelming.

That's what happens when we force a premature delivery. Raja should have had all the time in the world to complete his gestation period but noooooo. Intel's gotta hurry him up coz financials. Poor Raja.

 

[uzzi38]

Well at least it's faster in RT than AMD's equivalent cards.



Also who is that Tom that is raiding?

Port Royal is limited by VRAM capacity on both Arc and the 6500XT there. Both lose to a 6900HS running on the iGPU lol.

I scored 1 081 in Port Royal

AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, AMD Radeon 680M x 1, 31998 MB, 64-bit Windows 11}

www.3dmark.com

 

[igor_kavinski]

I bet Raja will now try to put some HBM3 on Battlemage. It's never his design that's the problem.

 

[Karnak]

Worse gaming performance than expected. Delay after delay and it's still... that bad?

 

[JasonLD]

I can see why Intel is holding off doing WW launch until later. Such a discrepancy between synthetic results and real game performance means their driver still has a long way to go.

 

[moonbogg]

I already knew it. Intel's "GPU" is just a way to sell more stickers on garbage Walmart OEM builds.

 

[Asterox]

Well that's underwhelming.

The test is not fair, RX6500XT belongs to a special category.

https://twitter.com/x/status/1539464660180688896

 

[mikk]

First 3rd party results are in. Loses to the 6400 in all of the games tested. Well that fell considerably below my expectations too :/

Intel Arc A380 desktop GPU is outperformed by Radeon RX 6400 in first independent gaming tests - VideoCardz.com

Intel Arc A380 desktop GPU finally tested Today Intel lifts the review embargo on its first Arc Alchemist desktop graphics cards. Intel Arc A380 GPU test, Source: Shenmedounengce The reviews posted today focus on the GUNNIR A380 Photon graphics card, which is thus far the only custom card based...

videocardz.com

In this test there is a power test using the Intel Fan Tuning Tool. It's 65W package power and 65C in Furmark, so I guess this is more accurate than the GPUz numbers.

The high fps games struggles the most, League of Legends A380 135 fps vs RTX RX6400 180 fps. Driver overhead seems horrible.

 

[uzzi38]

In this test there is a power test using the Intel Fan Tuning Tool. It's 65W package power and 65C in Furmark, so I guess this is more accurate than the GPUz numbers.

The high fps games struggles the most, League of Legends A380 135 fps vs RTX RX6400 180 fps. Driver overhead seems horrible.

Reported power numbers in software for ARC are not board power, they're more in-line with ASIC power in some way. We'll find out sooner or later what is and isn't being reported in more detail, but suffice to say the entire GPU is probably a bit closer to the specified 92W TBP.

 

[Tup3x]

It looks like they've only optimised the performance for 3DMark and the rest fall likely in the "it runs without horrible issues, performance be damned" category.

 

[Karnak]

Package Power for DG1 is GPU only, so I'm assuming the same goes for the A380 here.

Since the 75W TDP figure is base clock related according to Intel (at 2000MHz) it's probably more in the 80W-90W range while boosting.

 

[psolord]

Ok who changed the title?

 

[NTMBK]

Ok who changed the title?

Me You can edit the title of your own threads.

(Still not a crypto thread tho)

 

[jpiniero]

(Still not a crypto thread tho)

But every GPU thread is a crypto thread

 

[sdifox]

Deleted

You are thinking too much... these are anime characters, not actual people. [Redacted]

This is not an appropriate (or allowed) discussion in the tech forums.

AT Mod Usandthem

 

[igor_kavinski]

Since Mikasa is very conscious of her small boobs, her antagonist would obviously get a big set of knockers.

Someone get Intel ARC a [redacted]

This is not appropriate (or allowed) discussion in the tech forums.

AT Mod Usandthem

 

[DeathReborn]

It looks like they've only optimised the performance for 3DMark and the rest fall likely in the "it runs without horrible issues, performance be damned" category.

More like "lets cheat in 3DMark and maybe they won't test games". Last I saw they are still using the ~15% synthetic boosted drivers.

 

[Aapje]

Redacted

It would still be artificial [redacted]

This is not appropriate (or allowed) discussion in the tech forums.

AT Mod Usandthem

 

[Stuka87]

In this test there is a power test using the Intel Fan Tuning Tool. It's 65W package power and 65C in Furmark, so I guess this is more accurate than the GPUz numbers.

Because of how GPUz has to measure power, it requires an update before it can properly see power usage anytime a new CPU/GPU comes out. It basically has to extrapolate its values, because not every chip reports current draw the same way. Intel's own reporting should be accurate, provided they aren't fibbing.