AtenRa
Lifer
- Feb 2, 2009
- 14,003
- 3,362
- 136
I dont think its even worth upgrading from sandy bridge.I have 2500K@5Ghz almost 5 years old..
Yeap, SandyBridge owners better upgrade their GPU next year than go with Skylake.
I dont think its even worth upgrading from sandy bridge.I have 2500K@5Ghz almost 5 years old..
Well, some of improvements look nice for the folks that use them. For me, I'm a gamer who builds strictly gaming pc builds. I'll just sit on my locked i7 4770, I just don't see any of these chips that offer enough to put out money on it. I certainly am not going to buy new memory on top of everything else for something that appears to be a regression for my usage case in some scenarios. Perhaps the E line will give me a reason at some point.
Even against Haswell GT2 is not more than 15-20% faster on average.
Still slower than 1.5 year old 65W Kaveri.
Are we looking at the same graphs? 95 watt Kaveri top of the line is 5% faster in Bioshock, while Skylake is 58% faster in Half Life and 25% faster in GTA V.
And that is the "baseline" quad core igp. To be honest, I am surprised you would even comment on these charts, since they are an absolute humiliation for AMD. Think what iris pro will do.
Compare a GT-730 to a Titan Black (both released in 2014). The Titan would have no trouble being 4.5x faster, especially if the 730 runs out of VRAM.Erm, remind me when that happened? Because I sure don't remember that.
Discrete GPUs have made similar gains over the same period- compare a HD 6970 with a Fury X- but they took just as long to get there.
Go ahead and compare the slowest 2011 IGP to the newest Iris in 2015. It doesn't matter because a Titan-X will smash the GT-440 by much more than that.EDIT: And I was comparing with the mainstream chip, i.e. Skylake. If you want to compare with Broadwell with eDRAM, it's over 6X faster... and discrete GPUs have not improved any near that much in the same time period.
So Skylake seems to be slightly worse for gaming, but what about gaming while stream broadcasting? Since it beats DC in basically every non-gaming benchmark, would that make it the better choice for streaming your gaming sessions?
Compare a GT-730 to a Titan Black (both released in 2014). The Titan would have no trouble being 4.5x faster, especially if the 730 runs out of VRAM.
If you want to span four years, compare a GT440 (2011) to a Titan-X (2015). The performance difference should be close to a factor of 20x, certainly more than 10x.
Go ahead and compare the slowest 2011 IGP to the newest Iris in 2015. It doesn't matter because a Titan-X will smash the GT-440 by much more than that.
You might argue that it isn't fair, but it's reality. A user who purchased a GT-730 back in 2011 has the option to upgrade to a Titan-X in 2015 and get a far bigger performance difference than a 2011 IGP user upgrading to a 2015 Iris will get.
So Skylake seems to be slightly worse for gaming, but what about gaming while stream broadcasting? Since it beats DC in basically every non-gaming benchmark, would that make it the better choice for streaming your gaming sessions?
Interesting.
It seems like architectural improvements and process shrinks are stalling out at the same pace.
So Skylake seems to be slightly worse for gaming, but what about gaming while stream broadcasting? Since it beats DC in basically every non-gaming benchmark, would that make it the better choice for streaming your gaming sessions?
5775C and Baytrail are fundamentally different platforms so a desktop Iris is completely irrelevant because Baytrail can't upgrade to it. Such a comparison makes no sense.I am comparing two comparable products, Intel's flagship CPU. (Which once again does not have the fastest IGP available, just like back in the Sandy Bridge days.) You are comparing completely opposite ends of the cost spectrum. That would be like comparing a single-channel, 2W Bay Trail part against the i7-5775C.
http://www.anandtech.com/show/9483/intel-skylake-review-6700k-6600k-ddr4-ddr3-ipc-6th-generation
lol。。。。。
Sandy Bridge to Ivy Bridge: Average ~5.8% Up
Ivy Bridge to Haswell: Average ~11.2% Up
Haswell to Broadwell: Average ~3.3% Up
Broadwell to Skylake (DDR3): Average ~2.4% Up
Broadwell to Skylake (DDR4): Average ~2.7% Up
Haswell to Skylake (DDR3): Average ~5.7% Up.
Are we looking at the same graphs? 95 watt Kaveri top of the line is 5% faster in Bioshock, while Skylake is 58% faster in Half Life and 25% faster in GTA V.
And that is the "baseline" quad core igp. To be honest, I am surprised you would even comment on these charts, since they are an absolute humiliation for AMD. Think what iris pro will do.
He was referring to the A10-7800 by "65W" part, as it performs much the same as the 7850k.
But yeah, Skylake really pulls away in bandwidth heavy games. That DDR4 is pretty lovely.
lol。。。。。
Sandy Bridge to Ivy Bridge: Average ~5.8% Up
Ivy Bridge to Haswell: Average ~11.2% Up
Haswell to Broadwell: Average ~3.3% Up
Broadwell to Skylake (DDR3): Average ~2.4% Up
Broadwell to Skylake (DDR4): Average ~2.7% Up
Haswell to Skylake (DDR3): Average ~5.7% Up.
He was referring to the A10-7800 by "65W" part, as it performs much the same as the 7850k.
But yeah, Skylake really pulls away in bandwidth heavy games. That DDR4 is pretty lovely.