I just wanted to point out that I don't have any problem at all with you posting that you had X number of SSDs that failed from brand Y, no matter what brand it is.
It would have been nice if you included more information, though. As other people have mentioned, what systems the SSDs were in would be good to know. It would also be nice to know the SMART information (or a statement that the drives were unresponsive to SMART queries). Or an estimate of how many GBs had been written to the drives.
An exact description of the failure, how it was first noticed, and any other symptoms would have been good.
All of that would have made for an excellent post.
It was the other things you said that made people want to question you. Stuff like it was determined that the SSDs all failed due to bad flash. And that Intel's reputation for quality and reliability was in question because you have observed 3 failures.
I actually think Intel's SSD quality has gone down, but I don't base it on a sample size of 3 SSDs. I base it on the increase in return rate for Intel SSDs in a recent French etailer survey, and also on the fact that Intel recently switched to Sandforce controllers and apparently solved some but not all of the Sandforce BSOD issues. And a higher incidence of 1- or 2-egg newegg reviews for the Intel 520 SSDs as compared to earlier models of Intel SSDs. Even with this opinion, I do NOT think the issues are due to Intel flash. I think it is primarily firmware and controller related issues. And even with all this, I'd still choose Intel over OCZ. But I choose Plextor and Samsung over Intel at this point.