Ipod really that good?

Page 6 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Childs

Lifer
Jul 9, 2000
11,313
7
81
Originally posted by: Gurck
Is this supposed to prove something?

You've quoted me commenting on a market trend (the ipod is popular in large part because people tend to be gullible, but this isn't an insult to all ipod owners), responding in kind to people who've taken the first step in being uncivil to me and .. I'm not even sure what purpose you have in quoting the rest of those.

I'd especially like to go into your claim that I'm misleading people on the ipod's copy protection - care to explain that one in more detail?

Kudos for at least trying, I guess - I had expected more "lololo ur sux roflolol" - but the post still leaves something to be desired...

Not to beat a dead horse, as this thread totally fell off the map, but it is misleading, because the ipod will play unencrypted MP3s, you simply import them to the iPod using iTunes. When you mount the iPod you can traverse the filesystem and see the MP3s, unencrypted. You can copy them off and play them in media player of you choice, there is no decrypting involved. The fact that it doesn't play OGG or FLAC is somewhat moot, as most people do even know those formats exist, and you can use comparable formats on the iPod anyway.

And my reasoning for quoting your previous remarks was fairly self explanatory, especially since I stated the reasoning in the post.
 

Gurck

Banned
Mar 16, 2004
12,963
1
0
Originally posted by: Childs
Originally posted by: Gurck
Is this supposed to prove something?

You've quoted me commenting on a market trend (the ipod is popular in large part because people tend to be gullible, but this isn't an insult to all ipod owners), responding in kind to people who've taken the first step in being uncivil to me and .. I'm not even sure what purpose you have in quoting the rest of those.

I'd especially like to go into your claim that I'm misleading people on the ipod's copy protection - care to explain that one in more detail?

Kudos for at least trying, I guess - I had expected more "lololo ur sux roflolol" - but the post still leaves something to be desired...

Not to beat a dead horse, as this thread totally fell off the map, but it is misleading, because the ipod will play unencrypted MP3s, you simply import them to the iPod using iTunes. When you mount the iPod you can traverse the filesystem and see the MP3s, unencrypted. You can copy them off and play them in media player of you choice, there is no decrypting involved. The fact that it doesn't play OGG or FLAC is somewhat moot, as most people do even know those formats exist, and you can use comparable formats on the iPod anyway.

And my reasoning for quoting your previous remarks was fairly self explanatory, especially since I stated the reasoning in the post.
Since when can you freely copy music off the ipod? I've heard horror stories of peoples' ipods having all music deleted from them when trying this. All in the name of copy protection.

If ogg and flac are so unpopular why are they supported by so many DAPs & software players? On the other hand, itunes and ipods are the only players I know of with native support for aac or apple lossless, two truly unpopular formats.

At this point the horse is nothing but bloody goop and bits of fur on the ground... poor thing must have claimed Apple wasn't perfect, someone call PETA~
 

Childs

Lifer
Jul 9, 2000
11,313
7
81
Originally posted by: Gurck
Since when can you freely copy music off the ipod? I've heard horror stories of peoples' ipods having all music deleted from them when trying this. All in the name of copy protection.

You could always do it, it just wasn't obvious, and the typical user would not need to do it as they have their computer, and their iPod, and syncing is not a problem. Now, plugging it into someone else's computer to copy music is not something Apple is going to encourage because of their agreements with the RIAA, but you could always do it. Thats why there are so many 3rd party utilities to do just that.

If ogg and flac are so unpopular why are they supported by so many DAPs & software players? On the other hand, itunes and ipods are the only players I know of with native support for aac or apple lossless, two truly unpopular formats.

Considering AAC is the format for the iTunes music store, I question your notion of it being unpopular. The same with Apple loseless, in that its an option through iTunes and supported on the iPod, more people probably use those two formats than OGG or Flac, as they are niche formats, unless they download their music from P2P. Lets face it, MP3 is what people want and use, and most likely it has nothing to do with pure sound quality. To a significantly lesser extent WMA. Other mp3 player makers will start putting everything but the kitchen sink in their players to gain traction against the iPod, but for the most part its irrelevant. As for software players, OGG and Flac for the most part are not supported out of the box, requiring installation of separate codecs. If anything its a pain in the ass.



 

Mayfriday0529

Diamond Member
Sep 15, 2003
7,187
0
71
Holy Crap, this thread got some serious posts since the last time i replied, i got lots of reading material now.
 

HendrixFan

Diamond Member
Oct 18, 2001
4,646
0
71
Originally posted by: Gurck

Since when can you freely copy music off the ipod? I've heard horror stories of peoples' ipods having all music deleted from them when trying this. All in the name of copy protection.

As stated before, you can use third party software to do this, or you can use windows.

In windows you just "show hidden files and folders" (you dont even have to enable Hard Disk Usage with Itunes).

Watch as I am now able to navigate through Windows Explorer and locate the hidden music folder where all the MP3s are located. If you are uncomfortable loading 3rd party software, then this would be the route to go.

I have an Ipod and I got a good deal on it. Back when the 40gb models were $500 I got it new for $420 with free shipping. I spent alot of time researching (my brother had already gone through two lesser models from other companies) before deciding to throw down that kind of money. While I paid a price premium, in my mind, I got piece of mind knowing the warranty would be worthwhile and easy. I knew that the interface would be easy (unlike the two players my brother had gone through). I knew accessories were available *if* I decided to get more out of the player.

My biggest complaint is that a hard drive crash renders your Ipod useless with Itunes, because I found it to be great software. Since my crash, I have to reformat my Ipod to use with Itunes, or go with 3rd party software. The 3rd party software is quite good, and in some ways better than Itunes.

The old saying is that "you get what you pay for". You will pay a premium for the Ipod over other players, but I find it to be worth it.
 

Mayfriday0529

Diamond Member
Sep 15, 2003
7,187
0
71
Originally posted by: tiap


Jnetty99
To get realistic answers to your post, I guess you should have ask for responses from people who actually OWN an Ipod, and not just expert review readers. Sounds like some here, must own every make and model.

Well it seems this thread became a war between some people. but thanks everyone for your suggetiongs.

You know i wish i could play with several players before deciding but it seems like only apple stores have their units working unlike best buy and other stores all the units don't work since people break them and stuff.

It seems like i will not go with Apple and i'm not a hater of apple software.

I think i narrow it down to the following features
about 1000-2000 songs would be good
Nothing higher in price than 250$
I only use MP3 so thats important for me
Sound quality, just let me good.. i'm not a sound expert
The ability to be compatible with an online music store
Easy Navigation

That's it, i was just looking at the Creative Micro but i'll keep lookign.
 

daniel1113

Diamond Member
Jun 6, 2003
6,448
0
0
If you visit your local Best Buy, or a similar electronics store, they usually have a few players out for your to play with. I think most of the 5GB-10GB players will meet your needs just fine.
 

Mayfriday0529

Diamond Member
Sep 15, 2003
7,187
0
71
Originally posted by: daniel1113
If you visit your local Best Buy, or a similar electronics store, they usually have a few players out for your to play with. I think most of the 5GB-10GB players will meet your needs just fine.


Yeah but do they work, that's the problem. I was just there this weekend Best Buy and they had like 4 small players in display and the rest on the shelves in their package.
 

daniel1113

Diamond Member
Jun 6, 2003
6,448
0
0
Really? I haven't checked in a while, but the last time I was at Best Buy looking at mp3 players, they had a few out to mess with. You could try some other stores, but other than that, I think your only other option is to talk to friends.
 
Feb 19, 2001
20,155
23
81
They had the iRiver 20gb (h320?) and the Creative Zen (20gb) for me to play around. They also had a 20gb iPod. This was Best Buy.

Of course I don't go there very often when "Your best buys are always at Fry's... guaranteed!"
 

sxr7171

Diamond Member
Jun 21, 2002
5,079
40
91
Originally posted by: Gurck
Originally posted by: tiap
Ipods are probably the best, but expensive.
If you do get one, get a prog called Anapod for around 25 bucks. Itunes is absoute junk compared to this prog. It lets you copy music back and forth and literally use the ipod as a mobile hdrive with any data, not just music. The nicest feature is that it is not bloated like Itunes.
You can copy your mp3 to dvd for backup or to cd and they will play in some car cd decks.
USB1 is slow, so do as the video encoders do, let it run overnite.
Ipods aren't the best, they're among the worst. You're right about the expense though - it's not cheap to advertise constantly, especially during sports playoffs, and they have to recompense these expenses somehow.

Ipods follow the universal mass storage standard. This - not anapod - is what allows them and many other players, such as iaudio and iriver offerings, to function as plug & play hard drives. Unfortunately, due to copy protection concerns, the ipod will only play music which has been encrypted by itunes or a third party program such as anapod, ephpod, etc. - while other players allow you the far easier option of manipulating their contents with a file manager.


Maybe you should get your facts straight before you launch your crusade against the iPod. iTunes does not "encrypt" the music to be able to play it on an iPod, it simply puts it into a folder and then adds it to an internal database so it can remember things like ratings and playcounts and transfer that information back to your PC. The internal database is what allows you to search through your music so quickly and allows the player to create automatic playlists by rating and play counts.

As for sound quality, anyone who is a real audiophile (the term seems be used nowadays to describe people who suddenly chanced upon a pair of Bose headphones or think that more bass and treble amounts to better sound quality) would have read the "Stereophile" article a while back that shows the iPod's digital audio performance to rival CD players costing thousands of dollars. I even saw the graphs for Jitter, IM distortion, and a few other parameters that Stereophile goes through with every review of a digital product and was impressed (as was the editor and technical reviewer John Atkinson of Stereophile). The line-out performance from an iPod is unbeatable for its size and price. Even for headphone use, Apple lossless + Etymotic ER-4p + Flat equalizer makes an excellent combo.

A real audiophile appreciates a neutral sound that truly brings out the music and not some sort of bass enhanced garbage that the other players use to impress the uneducated consumer with "lots of bass." Most high end audiophile equipment DOES NOT have tone controls leave alone an equalizer. When you pair a good quality source with a good quality pair of headphones (a good headphone amp can be useful but not always practical), you don't need to mess with equalization. There are times when more bass can be fun (not realistic but fun) and so you can use the bass boost feature on the iPod to achieve that. I do it sometimes, but I get sick of it eventually because it sounds so unnatural to have boosted bass.

It is your choice to like bass boosted stuff, but don't quote some self proclaimed "audiophile" to say that such equipment has better "quality" sound. Look up the definition of the word "fidelity" and see why people don't know what "High-Fidelity" is.

It may be hard for you to believe that such a high-fashion trendoid product actually has solid technical merits, but it is true. I couldn't believe it myself, but I saw the Stereophile review and have heard the iPod. Maybe a tech geek might prefer another player for more options in terms of formats or customizability or whatever, but for an audiophile the iPod still reigns supreme. So know what you need in a player and choose accordingly. To say the iPod has poor sound is just wrong, it has other deficits but sound quality is not one of them (the fact that every Tom, Dick and Harry has one is). The best analogy I can come up with for now is that people hate BMW and the types of people who buy BMWs, because they are perceived as shallow, trendoid idiots who blindly follow anything. Sadly, probably 80% of BMW owners are such. However the car itself is still beautifully engineered and well crafted regardless of the shallow idiots who tend to buy it. Such is life sometimes.
 

jessieqwert

Senior member
Jun 21, 2003
955
1
81
I figure I have a pretty unique case so here goes:
I got my 4thG 40GB iPod for free with one of those online deals. I really enjoy it but I'm also really glad I didn't pay for it. I like to call it a hard drive with a screen strapped on it. The interface is not great and iTunes flat out sucks compared to other Media players. I would say get it heavily discounted or else look at another brand.
 

piroroadkill

Senior member
Sep 27, 2004
731
0
0
Originally posted by: Gurck
Ipod really that good?
Ew, no. They're well liked because Apple has spent a lot of money building an image for themselves and the ipod through advertising and most people are gullible.

I would bear your children were it possible.
 

DemonEX

Junior Member
May 3, 2005
2
0
0
I resent that! Apple has a good image because they have good products. Might I remind you who has the better OS the better CPUs. Come on man. The iPods ARE great because Apple is a GREAT company. Do you own one BTW? Cause if you dont... your missin out!
 

sxr7171

Diamond Member
Jun 21, 2002
5,079
40
91
Originally posted by: DemonEX
I resent that! Apple has a good image because they have good products. Might I remind you who has the better OS the better CPUs. Come on man. The iPods ARE great because Apple is a GREAT company. Do you own one BTW? Cause if you dont... your missin out!

WTF does CPU and OS have to do with anything related to the iPod moron? Stupid Apple fanboy.
 

Gurck

Banned
Mar 16, 2004
12,963
1
0
Originally posted by: Childs
You could always do it, it just wasn't obvious, and the typical user would not need to do it as they have their computer, and their iPod, and syncing is not a problem. Now, plugging it into someone else's computer to copy music is not something Apple is going to encourage because of their agreements with the RIAA, but you could always do it. Thats why there are so many 3rd party utilities to do just that.
Misunderstanding - I had taken it as a given that third party programs existed to extract music from an ipod - my point was that you can't do so without first installing one. What if you wanted to offload some songs from the ipod onto a linux box? Onto a PC with no internet connection by which to download a program enabling you to do that? Onto a PC on which you don't have access to an administrative account (common at the workplace)? Onto a PC when you don't have the time to fiddle with the program? In any of those scenarios, you're prevented from or hindered in manipulating music you own because of copy protection concerns. In any of those scenarios you'd have no problem with an iriver, iaudio, archos or neuros (among others) player. While I'm all for the idea behind copy protection, in implementation it never fails to strip away freedoms.

In regards to my above paragraph, I just read a reply by another poster asserting that you need simply browse a hidden file to access the music on an ipod. I have a few questions, since I don't feel like visiting my 3g 20gb owning friend (who btw, and not coincidentally, has a PC infested by unfathomable amounts of spyware ) to find out...
1 - If it's as simpile as a hidden folder, why can't you use a file manager to load music onto it?
2 - is this only possible on a PC with itunes and/or ipod docking software installed? I ask because, as I've said, I've read about many people trying to give a friend music (tsk tsk) or even put music from their ipod onto a second PC they own and having the ipod format itself in the name of copy protection.
3 - will music taken off the ipod in this manner play, or will it sound like gibberish or cause some kind of fault due to encryption?
4 - does the ipod's music folder support directory structure?
If ogg and flac are so unpopular why are they supported by so many DAPs & software players? On the other hand, itunes and ipods are the only players I know of with native support for aac or apple lossless, two truly unpopular formats.
Considering AAC is the format for the iTunes music store, I question your notion of it being unpopular. The same with Apple loseless, in that its an option through iTunes and supported on the iPod, more people probably use those two formats than OGG or Flac, as they are niche formats, unless they download their music from P2P. Lets face it, MP3 is what people want and use, and most likely it has nothing to do with pure sound quality. To a significantly lesser extent WMA. Other mp3 player makers will start putting everything but the kitchen sink in their players to gain traction against the iPod, but for the most part its irrelevant. As for software players, OGG and Flac for the most part are not supported out of the box, requiring installation of separate codecs. If anything its a pain in the ass.
Nice, but you failed to answer my question. I'll restate it: If aac and Apple lossless are so popular, why does only one brand of DAP play them and one PC player natively support them? Good point about wma - it too is more popular than Apple's proprietary formats.
 

Gurck

Banned
Mar 16, 2004
12,963
1
0
Originally posted by: sxr7171
As for sound quality, anyone who is a real audiophile (the term seems be used nowadays to describe people who suddenly chanced upon a pair of Bose headphones or think that more bass and treble amounts to better sound quality) would have read the "Stereophile" article a while back that shows the iPod's digital audio performance to rival CD players costing thousands of dollars. I even saw the graphs for Jitter, IM distortion, and a few other parameters that Stereophile goes through with every review of a digital product and was impressed (as was the editor and technical reviewer John Atkinson of Stereophile). The line-out performance from an iPod is unbeatable for its size and price. Even for headphone use, Apple lossless + Etymotic ER-4p + Flat equalizer makes an excellent combo.

A real audiophile appreciates a neutral sound that truly brings out the music and not some sort of bass enhanced garbage that the other players use to impress the uneducated consumer with "lots of bass." Most high end audiophile equipment DOES NOT have tone controls leave alone an equalizer. When you pair a good quality source with a good quality pair of headphones (a good headphone amp can be useful but not always practical), you don't need to mess with equalization. There are times when more bass can be fun (not realistic but fun) and so you can use the bass boost feature on the iPod to achieve that. I do it sometimes, but I get sick of it eventually because it sounds so unnatural to have boosted bass.

It is your choice to like bass boosted stuff, but don't quote some self proclaimed "audiophile" to say that such equipment has better "quality" sound. Look up the definition of the word "fidelity" and see why people don't know what "High-Fidelity" is.

It may be hard for you to believe that such a high-fashion trendoid product actually has solid technical merits, but it is true. I couldn't believe it myself, but I saw the Stereophile review and have heard the iPod. Maybe a tech geek might prefer another player for more options in terms of formats or customizability or whatever, but for an audiophile the iPod still reigns supreme. So know what you need in a player and choose accordingly. To say the iPod has poor sound is just wrong, it has other deficits but sound quality is not one of them (the fact that every Tom, Dick and Harry has one is). The best analogy I can come up with for now is that people hate BMW and the types of people who buy BMWs, because they are perceived as shallow, trendoid idiots who blindly follow anything. Sadly, probably 80% of BMW owners are such. However the car itself is still beautifully engineered and well crafted regardless of the shallow idiots who tend to buy it. Such is life sometimes.
Iirc Stereophile's review was of the ipod's line-out performance; this is an entirely different ball game. The ipod's headphone jack, cheap to save money (which is better spent on advertising), is to blame for its low sound quality. The reason many audiophiles have no problem with it is they use the line out -> amp -> speakers/headphones. Through the headphone jack, it has 0.42% THD - over 4 times the generally accepted audible threshold of 0.1% (iRiver's h320 measures in at 0.04%). The problem is that a line-out has very limited use on a portable player, which is meant to be listened to via the headphone jack, and is by likely 99% of users.

As I mentioned (and you ignored, going off on a basshead tirade), the ipod also attenuates bass to save on battery life. It's the opposite of a "basshead" player in that it has too little bass - but its reproduction is just as inaccurate. I prefer neutral sound, thank you very much...

The players of choice for audiophiles are the Rio Karma and 30gb Nomad Jukebox, not the ipod.

Btw I think BMWs are beautiful cars and that only a shallow idiot would so much as begin to form conclusions about the personality of someone who drives one
Originally posted by: jessieqwert
I figure I have a pretty unique case so here goes:
I got my 4thG 40GB iPod for free with one of those online deals. I really enjoy it but I'm also really glad I didn't pay for it. I like to call it a hard drive with a screen strapped on it. The interface is not great and iTunes flat out sucks compared to other Media players. I would say get it heavily discounted or else look at another brand.
:thumbsup:, at that price you can't go wrong
 

batmanuel

Platinum Member
Jan 15, 2003
2,144
0
0
Originally posted by: Gurck

...On size, keep in mind that the ipod is small because it has such a small battery. In addition to being responsible for its short battery life, this is also responsible in part for its low sound quality; specifically its tendency to sound tinny. Bass takes more energy to reproduce than mids and highs, so be attenuating it Apple was able to lengthen the ipod's battery life to 1/2-3/4 what other playres have at the expense of tinny sounding music. Further, have a look at the Rio Carbon and iAudio m3 if size is a concern. You have a point on price; the bigger discrepancies are found between the 20-40gb ipod models and their competition.


True, the OLD iPod Mini had crappy bass and generally tinny sound quality. The current 4GB and 6GB models have a new DAC that reproduces low frequences much better.

From the PC Magazine review of the new 6GB mini:

Audiophiles complained that the original mini just didn't have a whole lot of kick at the low end, and testing on our part confirmed that. We eagerly downloaded our suite of test files and music to the new mini, and fired up our oscilloscope and spectrum analyzer, to measure what our ears were telling us (click here for details on how we test music players). We noted some weakness in the lowest register, between 20 and 30 Hz. But with the exception of pipe organ concertos, there isn't much music down there. From 30 Hz on up, the mini is in full control and reproduces sound cleanly and accurately, right up through the upper limits of human hearing.

The extra bass is not immediately apparent with the stock earbuds. But listen through, say, Etymotic or Shure in-canal phones or through high-quality headphones, and you'll notice the difference. It also helps to play some tracks with deep, insanely overproduced bass, such as Billy Joel's "River of Dreams" or anything by Sublime. But the improvement is just as evident on orchestral pieces with clear double bass and bass drum parts. It's too bad Apple didn't adopt the push-pull circuitry of the iPod shuffle, which is better still.


Also, battery size alone doesn't tell you how good the bass reproduction of a portable audio player will be. Well-designed output circuitry can still put out a lot of thump even with a small amount of juice powering the circuit. The iPod Shuffle is an example of this, which has really nice sound quality (and lots of bass) despite being a tiny player with a small little battery, thanks to a special type of push-pull output circuit that Apple has designed.
 

Gurck

Banned
Mar 16, 2004
12,963
1
0
Originally posted by: batmanuel
Originally posted by: Gurck

...On size, keep in mind that the ipod is small because it has such a small battery. In addition to being responsible for its short battery life, this is also responsible in part for its low sound quality; specifically its tendency to sound tinny. Bass takes more energy to reproduce than mids and highs, so be attenuating it Apple was able to lengthen the ipod's battery life to 1/2-3/4 what other playres have at the expense of tinny sounding music. Further, have a look at the Rio Carbon and iAudio m3 if size is a concern. You have a point on price; the bigger discrepancies are found between the 20-40gb ipod models and their competition.


True, the OLD iPod Mini had crappy bass and generally tinny sound quality. The current 4GB and 6GB models have a new DAC that reproduces low frequences much better.

From the PC Magazine review of the new 6GB mini:

Audiophiles complained that the original mini just didn't have a whole lot of kick at the low end, and testing on our part confirmed that. We eagerly downloaded our suite of test files and music to the new mini, and fired up our oscilloscope and spectrum analyzer, to measure what our ears were telling us (click here for details on how we test music players). We noted some weakness in the lowest register, between 20 and 30 Hz. But with the exception of pipe organ concertos, there isn't much music down there. From 30 Hz on up, the mini is in full control and reproduces sound cleanly and accurately, right up through the upper limits of human hearing.

The extra bass is not immediately apparent with the stock earbuds. But listen through, say, Etymotic or Shure in-canal phones or through high-quality headphones, and you'll notice the difference. It also helps to play some tracks with deep, insanely overproduced bass, such as Billy Joel's "River of Dreams" or anything by Sublime. But the improvement is just as evident on orchestral pieces with clear double bass and bass drum parts. It's too bad Apple didn't adopt the push-pull circuitry of the iPod shuffle, which is better still.


Also, battery size alone doesn't tell you how good the bass reproduction of a portable audio player will be. Well-designed output circuitry can still put out a lot of thump even with a small amount of juice powering the circuit. The iPod Shuffle is an example of this, which has really nice sound quality (and lots of bass) despite being a tiny player with a small little battery, thanks to a special type of push-pull output circuit that Apple has designed.
Interesting, I've got some research to do now, if indeed the ipod is approaching its competition in terms of sound quality via the headphone jack.
 

sxr7171

Diamond Member
Jun 21, 2002
5,079
40
91
Originally posted by: Gurck
Originally posted by: sxr7171
As for sound quality, anyone who is a real audiophile (the term seems be used nowadays to describe people who suddenly chanced upon a pair of Bose headphones or think that more bass and treble amounts to better sound quality) would have read the "Stereophile" article a while back that shows the iPod's digital audio performance to rival CD players costing thousands of dollars. I even saw the graphs for Jitter, IM distortion, and a few other parameters that Stereophile goes through with every review of a digital product and was impressed (as was the editor and technical reviewer John Atkinson of Stereophile). The line-out performance from an iPod is unbeatable for its size and price. Even for headphone use, Apple lossless + Etymotic ER-4p + Flat equalizer makes an excellent combo.

A real audiophile appreciates a neutral sound that truly brings out the music and not some sort of bass enhanced garbage that the other players use to impress the uneducated consumer with "lots of bass." Most high end audiophile equipment DOES NOT have tone controls leave alone an equalizer. When you pair a good quality source with a good quality pair of headphones (a good headphone amp can be useful but not always practical), you don't need to mess with equalization. There are times when more bass can be fun (not realistic but fun) and so you can use the bass boost feature on the iPod to achieve that. I do it sometimes, but I get sick of it eventually because it sounds so unnatural to have boosted bass.

It is your choice to like bass boosted stuff, but don't quote some self proclaimed "audiophile" to say that such equipment has better "quality" sound. Look up the definition of the word "fidelity" and see why people don't know what "High-Fidelity" is.

It may be hard for you to believe that such a high-fashion trendoid product actually has solid technical merits, but it is true. I couldn't believe it myself, but I saw the Stereophile review and have heard the iPod. Maybe a tech geek might prefer another player for more options in terms of formats or customizability or whatever, but for an audiophile the iPod still reigns supreme. So know what you need in a player and choose accordingly. To say the iPod has poor sound is just wrong, it has other deficits but sound quality is not one of them (the fact that every Tom, Dick and Harry has one is). The best analogy I can come up with for now is that people hate BMW and the types of people who buy BMWs, because they are perceived as shallow, trendoid idiots who blindly follow anything. Sadly, probably 80% of BMW owners are such. However the car itself is still beautifully engineered and well crafted regardless of the shallow idiots who tend to buy it. Such is life sometimes.
Iirc Stereophile's review was of the ipod's line-out performance; this is an entirely different ball game. The ipod's headphone jack, cheap to save money (which is better spent on advertising), is to blame for its low sound quality. The reason many audiophiles have no problem with it is they use the line out -> amp -> speakers/headphones. Through the headphone jack, it has 0.42% THD - over 4 times the generally accepted audible threshold of 0.1% (iRiver's h320 measures in at 0.04%). The problem is that a line-out has very limited use on a portable player, which is meant to be listened to via the headphone jack, and is by likely 99% of users.

As I mentioned (and you ignored, going off on a basshead tirade), the ipod also attenuates bass to save on battery life. It's the opposite of a "basshead" player in that it has too little bass - but its reproduction is just as inaccurate. I prefer neutral sound, thank you very much...

The players of choice for audiophiles are the Rio Karma and 30gb Nomad Jukebox, not the ipod.

Btw I think BMWs are beautiful cars and that only a shallow idiot would so much as begin to form conclusions about the personality of someone who drives one
Originally posted by: jessieqwert
I figure I have a pretty unique case so here goes:
I got my 4thG 40GB iPod for free with one of those online deals. I really enjoy it but I'm also really glad I didn't pay for it. I like to call it a hard drive with a screen strapped on it. The interface is not great and iTunes flat out sucks compared to other Media players. I would say get it heavily discounted or else look at another brand.
:thumbsup:, at that price you can't go wrong



The roll-off in the bass occurs with low impedance headphones, if you have headphones with greater than 32 ohm impedence you should be okay. The THD is measured at a certain power output so if both companies are not using the same rated power at which they are specifying THD, then the numbers are not comparable. Apple claims that the headphone amp puts out 30mw per channel, but there is speculation that it is 30mw at 8 ohms. Still 7.5mw at 32 ohms is better than most (if not almost all) portable CD players. Also they don't attenuate bass to save battery power as much as use capacitors that aren't really with the program. Again using headphones with 32 ohms or greater impedence solves that problem.

I am going to get a portable headphone amp anyway and I would have with any portable music player I got. With a decent headphone amp the iPod is the Audiophile portable music player to get. It has the most potential. It's also the best for use as a second digital music source for your home stereo.

As for BMW, I personally don't give a hoot about what the common perception of owners is. I'm still getting a 330ci or M3 after I graduate.
 

sniperruff

Lifer
Apr 17, 2002
11,644
2
0
the ipod/ipod mini are both decent mp3 players that are cheaper/not as good as the iriver and more expensive/much better than crap such as the zen xtra.

and trust me, rio's products are built pretty crappily. i own the forge 256.

there

[/thread]
 

Gurck

Banned
Mar 16, 2004
12,963
1
0
Originally posted by: sxr7171
The roll-off in the bass occurs with low impedance headphones, if you have headphones with greater than 32 ohm impedence you should be okay. The THD is measured at a certain power output so if both companies are not using the same rated power at which they are specifying THD, then the numbers are not comparable. Apple claims that the headphone amp puts out 30mw per channel, but there is speculation that it is 30mw at 8 ohms. Still 7.5mw at 32 ohms is better than most (if not almost all) portable CD players. Also they don't attenuate bass to save battery power as much as use capacitors that aren't really with the program. Again using headphones with 32 ohms or greater impedence solves that problem.

I am going to get a portable headphone amp anyway and I would have with any portable music player I got. With a decent headphone amp the iPod is the Audiophile portable music player to get. It has the most potential. It's also the best for use as a second digital music source for your home stereo.

As for BMW, I personally don't give a hoot about what the common perception of owners is. I'm still getting a 330ci or M3 after I graduate.
The numbers I've given were test results from an independant third party - one who actually liked the ipod (the writeup, unsurprisingly, read much like the 'ipod through the eyes of a 13 year old' review I linked earlier). He also tested it with a few higher end phones and came to the conclusion that while they helped, they didn't alleviate its sad bass response. Further, I've plugged my 280s - 64ohm impedence - into my buddy's 3g ipod and immediately noticed its lackluster low end response. 280s can reproduce bass very accurately and can go extremely low, but not when hooked up to an ipod...

I hope you enjoy your headphone amp, I'm going to build a cmoy one of these days myself. We, however, are in the minority. Most ipod users think of amps as clunky things you drag around and wouldn't consider using them - or for that matter replacing the stock buds. Many probably don't even know there is such a thing. Hence the majority of buyers are using the headphone jack, and the line out / amp argument doesn't apply.
 

SickBeast

Lifer
Jul 21, 2000
14,377
19
81
Originally posted by: DemonEX
I resent that! Apple has a good image because they have good products. Might I remind you who has the better OS the better CPUs. Come on man. The iPods ARE great because Apple is a GREAT company. Do you own one BTW? Cause if you dont... your missin out!

You might want to look at the dual-cored Opteron benchmarks on the main AT page...

Has the G5 gone dual-core yet? Four heads are better than two, as they say. I would venture to guess than even the dual-cored intel Prescott would dust the dual G5 in many regards.

If you look at Apple's laptop CPUs they're a complete joke next to the Centrino.
 
sale-70-410-exam    | Exam-200-125-pdf    | we-sale-70-410-exam    | hot-sale-70-410-exam    | Latest-exam-700-603-Dumps    | Dumps-98-363-exams-date    | Certs-200-125-date    | Dumps-300-075-exams-date    | hot-sale-book-C8010-726-book    | Hot-Sale-200-310-Exam    | Exam-Description-200-310-dumps?    | hot-sale-book-200-125-book    | Latest-Updated-300-209-Exam    | Dumps-210-260-exams-date    | Download-200-125-Exam-PDF    | Exam-Description-300-101-dumps    | Certs-300-101-date    | Hot-Sale-300-075-Exam    | Latest-exam-200-125-Dumps    | Exam-Description-200-125-dumps    | Latest-Updated-300-075-Exam    | hot-sale-book-210-260-book    | Dumps-200-901-exams-date    | Certs-200-901-date    | Latest-exam-1Z0-062-Dumps    | Hot-Sale-1Z0-062-Exam    | Certs-CSSLP-date    | 100%-Pass-70-383-Exams    | Latest-JN0-360-real-exam-questions    | 100%-Pass-4A0-100-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-300-135-exams-date    | Passed-200-105-Tech-Exams    | Latest-Updated-200-310-Exam    | Download-300-070-Exam-PDF    | Hot-Sale-JN0-360-Exam    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Exams    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-JN0-360-exams-date    | Exam-Description-1Z0-876-dumps    | Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps    | Dumps-HPE0-Y53-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-HPE0-Y53-Exam    | 100%-Pass-HPE0-Y53-Real-Exam-Questions    | Pass-4A0-100-Exam    | Latest-4A0-100-Questions    | Dumps-98-365-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-98-365-Exam    | 100%-Pass-VCS-254-Exams    | 2017-Latest-VCS-273-Exam    | Dumps-200-355-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-300-320-Exam    | Pass-300-101-Exam    | 100%-Pass-300-115-Exams    |
http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    | http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    |