Is Cathlocism Worse Than Islam?

[greatnoob]

I love it when you talk dirty. What is the thread title?

You're conceding the fact you lack reading comprehension skills just as I said a few pages ago? Good. Now address my question dipshit. What is the thread actually about and how is your comparison of ISIS and the crusades remotely valid or related to the thread at hand?

I'll remind you again that your entire argument was based on the wrong assumption that this was a Christianity vs Islam thread (because you were too much of a fucking idiot to read the thread post, lol):

If the OP wanted to have a discussion around pedophile priests, there would be no need to mention Islam at all.

What the OP explicitly said this thread was about:

This thread has nothing to do with theological guidance and everything to do with catholic priests raping children. Then having their superiors cover it up.

You realise you're just adding to salt to the injury right? I'm going to keep this point stuck here

 

[whm1974]

OK to help bring this thread back on topic, I'm going to give my thoughts on the Catholicism vs Islam subject.

At this present time I would say that Islam is worse due to the current amount of terrorism being committed by some of the followers of Islam. Historically? They are both the same.

 

[Starbuck1975]

You're conceding the fact you lack reading comprehension skills just as I said a few pages ago? Good. Now address my question dipshit. What is the thread actually about and how is your comparison of ISIS and the crusades remotely valid or related to the thread at hand?

I'll remind you again that your entire argument was based on the wrong assumption that this was a Christianity vs Islam thread (because you were too much of a fucking idiot to read the thread post, lol):

What the OP explicitly said this thread was about:


You realise you're just adding to salt to the injury right? I'm going to keep this point stuck here

What is the title of the thread?

 

[whm1974]

I now have 666 likes. Does this mean anything? Am I now the Antichrist?

 

[Younigue]

I now have 666 likes. Does this mean anything? Am I now the Antichrist?

Man! Then someone went and ruined it by giving you another like but the answer to your question is yes, for the amount of time your likes were at 666 you were in fact the antichrist. Whatchu do with that time? I hope you at least made it interesting.

 

[whm1974]

Man! Then someone went and ruined it by giving you another like but the answer to your question is yes, for the amount of time your likes were at 666 you were in fact the anti-Christ. Whatchu do with that time? I hope you at least made it interesting.

Sorry not enough time to do anything really. I really hoping to deflower a group of young Nuns in an orgy.

 

[Younigue]

Sorry not enough time to do anything really. I really hoping to deflower a group of young Nuns in an orgy.

That would have been interesting though.

 

[whm1974]

That would have been interesting though.

At least I got to watch them make out with each other. But alas as I was getting ready to join in and start doing some deflowering, POOF all of the sudden I was back home doing what was I doing.

 

[Younigue]

At least I got to watch them make out with each other. But alas as I was getting ready to join in and start doing some deflowering, POOF all of the sudden I was back home doing what was I doing.

And that was... Thinking about being in an orgy with nuns? I'm guessing.

 

[whm1974]

And that was... Thinking about being in an orgy with nuns? I'm guessing.

Yes, and 18 y/o nuns at that.

 

[Younigue]

Yes, and 18 y/o nuns at that.

So young, dumb, inexperienced, immature, underdeveloped? Sounds gross and not pleasurable at all. But Optics is everything?

 

[Puffnstuff]

If we spent a fraction of the money on the poor that we funnel back towards the rich they'd be living pretty good right now in this country.

 

[whm1974]

So young, dumb, inexperienced, immature, underdeveloped? Sounds gross and not pleasurable at all. But Optics is everything?

I said 18 not 8.

 

[Younigue]

I said 18 not 8.

You think 18 year olds can bring "adult" in to the scenario? Just the day before they were children. Best to leave the 18 year olds to the 18 year olds imo.

 

[greatnoob]

What is the title of the thread?

And what is the thread actually about according to OP? Had you read the original post you wouldn’t be looking like a complete fucking idiot right now. Now for the 100th time are you willing to answer my question? Or are you going to keep being the dishonest fuck I’ve shown you to be and not own up to your stupidity? Essentially you’re admitting here that you didn’t bother to read the thread. Is this how you’ll concede your idiocyin this thread?

Surely you’d like to tell us how in your mind ISIS and crusades are relevant to the topic at hand which we’ve all known was about pedophole Catholic priests using their status to their advantage. Please tell us how your insane blabbering and whataboutisms in this thread are at all relevant now that you know exactly what this thread is about.

 

[Starbuck1975]

And what is the thread actually about according to OP? Had you read the original post you wouldn’t be looking like a complete fucking idiot right now. Now for the 100th time are you willing to answer my question? Or are you going to keep being the dishonest fuck I’ve shown you to be and not own up to your stupidity? Essentially you’re admitting here that you didn’t bother to read the thread. Is this how you’ll concede your idiocyin this thread?

Surely you’d like to tell us how in your mind ISIS and crusades are relevant to the topic at hand which we’ve all known was about pedophole Catholic priests using their status to their advantage. Please tell us how your insane blabbering and whataboutisms in this thread are at all relevant now that you know exactly what this thread is about.

What is the title of the thread?

 

[ivwshane]

And what is the thread actually about according to OP? Had you read the original post you wouldn’t be looking like a complete fucking idiot right now. Now for the 100th time are you willing to answer my question? Or are you going to keep being the dishonest fuck I’ve shown you to be and not own up to your stupidity? Essentially you’re admitting here that you didn’t bother to read the thread. Is this how you’ll concede your idiocyin this thread?

Surely you’d like to tell us how in your mind ISIS and crusades are relevant to the topic at hand which we’ve all known was about pedophole Catholic priests using their status to their advantage. Please tell us how your insane blabbering and whataboutisms in this thread are at all relevant now that you know exactly what this thread is about.

You must forgive him, he only reads the title of things. How else would someone like him be so ignorant on so many topics?

 

[Lanyap]

You still haven't decided which is worse yet? I say call it 50/50 and move on.

 

[greatnoob]

What is the title of the thread?

By repeating this you’re only making yourself look like the dishonest moron I rightly said you were because you can’t answer my question and now you’re stuck repeating this question (which I’ve gone out of my way to answer for you multiple times). This still makes you look stupid because you’re admitting you aren’t capable of reading before posting your shit tier opinions in these sort of threads - except this time I called you out on it and now we can look at you weaselling like the dishonest dropckick you are. I (and even the OP) explained a few pages ago to you what the thread was about (because like most, we actually bothered to read past just the title). You aren’t capable of any other defence except to point at the title and show your ignorance to all. This is seen as a counter argument to you somehow lol. Pathetic.

So you’re essentially admitting that your bottom of the barrel stupid comparisons that I called you out on multiple times, were based on not the actual topic at hand but what you foolishly thought it was about solely based on the title of the thread.

How does that make you look? You’re admitting to not reading the thread, making bullshit and laughably stupid arguments and then falling back on ignorance and “it was just a prank bro” when you can’t answer how your comparisons are valid or relevant to the actual topic at hand (catholic priests using their authority and power to hide their pedophiles).


I'll remind you again that your entire argument was based on the wrong assumption that this was a Christianity vs Islam thread (because you were too much of a fucking idiot to read the thread post, lol):

If the OP wanted to have a discussion around pedophile priests, there would be no need to mention Islam at all.

Once again here is what the OP said the thread was about:

This thread has nothing to do with theological guidance and everything to do with catholic priests raping children. Then having their superiors cover it up.

I’ll ask you for the 101th time: How is your comparison of ISIS and the crusades remotely valid or related to the thread at hand?

I’m not expecting an answer, i want to see you keep dodging what I’ve asked you for multiple pages. This is purely for posterity so everybody can see you for the little weasel you are. Ladies and gents I present to you the average dishonest conservatard Starbuck1975. Doesn’t read past the title, makes laughably stupid comparisons, gets called out on it, can’t answer a simple question and tries to brush off his ignorance as a joke when called out on it. What a sad and intellectually dishonest fuckwit you have to be to not admit or own up to your mistakes

 

[Lanyap]

By repeating this you’re only making yourself look like the dishonest moron I rightly said you were because you can’t answer my question and now you’re stuck repeating this question (which I’ve gone out of my way to answer for you multiple times). This still makes you look stupid because you’re admitting you aren’t capable of reading before posting your shit tier opinions in these sort of threads - except this time I called you out on it and now we can look at you weaselling like the dishonest dropckick you are. I (and even the OP) explained a few pages ago to you what the thread was about (because like most, we actually bothered to read past just the title). You aren’t capable of any other defence except to point at the title and show your ignorance to all. This is seen as a counter argument to you somehow lol. Pathetic.

So you’re essentially admitting that your bottom of the barrel stupid comparisons that I called you out on multiple times, were based on not the actual topic at hand but what you foolishly thought it was about solely based on the title of the thread.

How does that make you look? You’re admitting to not reading the thread, making bullshit and laughably stupid arguments and then falling back on ignorance and “it was just a prank bro” when you can’t answer how your comparisons are valid or relevant to the actual topic at hand (catholic priests using their authority and power to hide their pedophiles).


I'll remind you again that your entire argument was based on the wrong assumption that this was a Christianity vs Islam thread (because you were too much of a fucking idiot to read the thread post, lol):


Once again here is what the OP said the thread was about:


I’ll ask you for the 101th time: How is your comparison of ISIS and the crusades remotely valid or related to the thread at hand?

I’m not expecting an answer, i want to see you keep dodging what I’ve asked you for multiple pages. This is purely for posterity so everybody can see you for the little weasel you are. Ladies and gents I present to you the average dishonest conservatard Starbuck1975. Doesn’t read past the title, makes laughably stupid comparisons, gets called out on it, can’t answer a simple question and tries to brush off his ignorance as a joke when called out on it. What a sad and intellectually dishonest fuckwit you have to be to not admit or own up to your mistakes

Chill, go have a drink or a drug of your choice. Move on. Seriously.

 

[Starbuck1975]

By repeating this you’re only making yourself look like the dishonest moron I rightly said you were because you can’t answer my question and now you’re stuck repeating this question (which I’ve gone out of my way to answer for you multiple times). This still makes you look stupid because you’re admitting you aren’t capable of reading before posting your shit tier opinions in these sort of threads - except this time I called you out on it and now we can look at you weaselling like the dishonest dropckick you are. I (and even the OP) explained a few pages ago to you what the thread was about (because like most, we actually bothered to read past just the title). You aren’t capable of any other defence except to point at the title and show your ignorance to all. This is seen as a counter argument to you somehow lol. Pathetic.

So you’re essentially admitting that your bottom of the barrel stupid comparisons that I called you out on multiple times, were based on not the actual topic at hand but what you foolishly thought it was about solely based on the title of the thread.

How does that make you look? You’re admitting to not reading the thread, making bullshit and laughably stupid arguments and then falling back on ignorance and “it was just a prank bro” when you can’t answer how your comparisons are valid or relevant to the actual topic at hand (catholic priests using their authority and power to hide their pedophiles).


I'll remind you again that your entire argument was based on the wrong assumption that this was a Christianity vs Islam thread (because you were too much of a fucking idiot to read the thread post, lol):


Once again here is what the OP said the thread was about:


I’ll ask you for the 101th time: How is your comparison of ISIS and the crusades remotely valid or related to the thread at hand?

I’m not expecting an answer, i want to see you keep dodging what I’ve asked you for multiple pages. This is purely for posterity so everybody can see you for the little weasel you are. Ladies and gents I present to you the average dishonest conservatard Starbuck1975. Doesn’t read past the title, makes laughably stupid comparisons, gets called out on it, can’t answer a simple question and tries to brush off his ignorance as a joke when called out on it. What a sad and intellectually dishonest fuckwit you have to be to not admit or own up to your mistakes

If you want to perform a service for posterity, you really need to work on brevity. So many words.

I entered the thread at post #58. When I entered the thread, people were already talking about the Crusades and various other wars between the Christian and Islamic worlds. Take it up with them if you believe those comparisons are out of scope. Post #38 was when people started to talk about the relative violent histories of the Abrahamic religions.

The OP did not clarify his true intent until post #269, the post you keep fixating on. By the time he did so it did not matter because numerous posters were already comparing the two religions across numerous criteria because that was the question posed in the thread title.

I am not answering your question because it is irrelevant. The point you are failing so hard to make is irrelevant.

You want to do the forum a service? Get the OP to change his thread title to reflect his intent.

 

[Starbuck1975]

Chill, go have a drink or a drug of your choice. Move on. Seriously.

He’s performing a service for posterity

 

[greatnoob]

If you want to perform a service for posterity, you really need to work on brevity. So many words.

I entered the thread at post #58. When I entered the thread, people were already talking about the Crusades and various other wars between the Christian and Islamic worlds. Take it up with them if you believe those comparisons are out of scope. Post #38 was when people started to talk about the relative violent histories of the Abrahamic religions.

The OP did not clarify his true intent until post #269, the post you keep fixating on. By the time he did so it did not matter because numerous posters were already comparing the two religions across numerous criteria because that was the question posed in the thread title.

I am not answering your question because it is irrelevant. The point you are failing so hard to make is irrelevant.

You want to do the forum a service? Get the OP to change his thread title to reflect his intent.

Brevity? I have to spell thing out for you because of your selective reading and shitty memory. I'm keeping my posts standalone so anybody who walks in here can see exactly how you've derailed the thread. The detail I'm going through here isn't for you, you're to dishonest to own up to your mistake - I mean you've just just been spamming "What's the thread title" every time I've asked you to backup your shit tier invalid comparisons. I'm still waiting for answer by the way, but I know you're too much of a dishonest fuckwit to admit you're wrong on all fronts.
I'm asking you specifically because you made the wrong assumption about this thread. Your whataboutism here is the same in every single thread you post in - mostly baseless, false premises and when challenged you resort to playing your tired dishonest conservatard act.

It's not irrelevant just because you can't answer it. But please tell us how your comparisons to Spacey, ISIS and holy wars are relevant to the topic at hand? Are you really saying me calling you out on your whataboutism not related to this topic is irrelevant? Jesus you are dense.

Now are you willing to answer the question or are you going to keep being a dishonest fuckwit? Are you wiling to accept that you didn't read past the the thread, foolishly made a wrong assumption about the thread and as a result blurted out whatever dumb shit came to your mind (once again I'll remind you ISIS is not a representative of Islam, you still haven't explained to us why you thought they were or how it was relevant to this thread but that's a whole nother 20 pages of you playing stupid) that you are now not able to argue for? A few posts ago you were very sure of yourself but I've still yet to see you answer any of my points. This is a non-answer and you are now putting the blame on OP and other users for YOUR ignorance and stupidity.


How is it that by you not reading past the thread title and posting whatever incoherent argument you have in your mind, was the fault of anybody but yourself? Typical of a dishonest fucker like yourself to blame others.

 

[greatnoob]

He’s performing a service for posterity

Feel free to answer my point whenever you want, this time try not to blame others for your own ignorance. Idiot.

 

[ivwshane]

Chill, go have a drink or a drug of your choice. Move on. Seriously.

Snowflakes gotta stick together, right?