boomerang
Lifer
- Jun 19, 2000
- 18,883
- 641
- 126
Insurance companies do this routinely because it's less expensive than dragging it through the court system.
Nearly 20 years ago, I pulled out of parking space at work (we all backed in) and a guy employed there came around the corner on his motorcycle and tore up the aisle at full throttle. It was one of those things where the timing was such that it was unavoidable. He glanced off the front bumper of my car, continued accelerating and then realizing he was hurt, he slowed the motorcycle almost to a stop and dropped it. His right leg was broken. There were numerous witnesses. Because it happened immediately after work, and on private property, neither of us was ticketed and he had no recourse against me under state law.
My insurance company paid all his expenses for the six months he was out of work which encompassed surgery, healing and rehabilitation.
I don't feel I was at fault, but I will share fault with him. I too, at the time felt it was wrong that my insurance company covered his expenses. But if the circumstances had been reversed I'd sure have been glad. It was the right thing to do.
He hired a moron of a lawyer that sent me a letter stating their intent to sue me. I forwarded it to my insurance company and heard nothing more about it. As I said, under state law he could not sue me. His lawyer should have known that.
Nearly 20 years ago, I pulled out of parking space at work (we all backed in) and a guy employed there came around the corner on his motorcycle and tore up the aisle at full throttle. It was one of those things where the timing was such that it was unavoidable. He glanced off the front bumper of my car, continued accelerating and then realizing he was hurt, he slowed the motorcycle almost to a stop and dropped it. His right leg was broken. There were numerous witnesses. Because it happened immediately after work, and on private property, neither of us was ticketed and he had no recourse against me under state law.
My insurance company paid all his expenses for the six months he was out of work which encompassed surgery, healing and rehabilitation.
I don't feel I was at fault, but I will share fault with him. I too, at the time felt it was wrong that my insurance company covered his expenses. But if the circumstances had been reversed I'd sure have been glad. It was the right thing to do.
He hired a moron of a lawyer that sent me a letter stating their intent to sue me. I forwarded it to my insurance company and heard nothing more about it. As I said, under state law he could not sue me. His lawyer should have known that.