He might, Biden's team better learn quickly how to fight dirty, the GOP are much better with social media but the amount of material the Dem's have is staggering, trump remains the sole POTUS who has not furnished his tax returns since it started in the early '60's.I'm not saying Trump is a better choice, he isn't. I'm saying he will Win.
If fighting dirty is the only way to win an election, that says more about the voters than the person running for office. Personally the dirty campaigns of today need to go. It's time that they start talking about what they plan to do to fix or better our county rather than spending most of the time attacking who they are up against. If we handled a job interview like this, we would be thrown out with no chance for the position. Same needs to happen here.He might, Biden's team better learn quickly how to fight dirty, the GOP are much better with social media but the amount of material the Dem's have is staggering, trump remains the sole POTUS who has not furnished his tax returns since it started in the early '60's.
He might, Biden's team better learn quickly how to fight dirty, the GOP are much better with social media but the amount of material the Dem's have is staggering, trump remains the sole POTUS who has not furnished his tax returns since it started in the early '60's.
If fighting dirty is the only way to win an election, that says more about the voters than the person running for office. Personally the dirty campaigns of today need to go. It's time that they start talking about what they plan to do to fix or better our county rather than spending most of the time attacking who they are up against. If we handled a job interview like this, we would be thrown out with no chance for the position. Same needs to happen here.
I thought Joe is supposed to stay positive while Bloomberg spends a billion drowning Trump in the vile cesspool that is Trump’s record.
Yea, skeletons, problem is Trump has a graveyard in his back pocket.How Electable is Biden? All his skeletons in one video.
Pulling out the Obama factor, and so soon?
Yea, skeletons, problem is Trump has a graveyard in his back pocket.
Let this sink in........
View attachment 17943
Actually, this would not be "awesome". It just shows how bankrupt and politically inept the Dems are that they cannot come up with a viable candidate after 4 years (almost) of seeing what Trump has done to the country.That would be awesome. Truly, but https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/former-president-becomes-vice-president/
Nixw try,,,,you shouldn`t post a link and make people think your ,ionk disproves something when it niether supports nor disproves what was said!! --- Fact check -- Unproven!! NOT False!!That would be awesome. Truly, but https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/former-president-becomes-vice-president/
While what you say is true, it is obvious that the intent of the amendment limiting terms is to prevent a president from serving more than two terms. Nominating Obama would be such an obvious way of trying to circumvent this that I think people would rebel in droves. It really is the kind of thing that Trump and the republicans would do. If the dems cant come up with a viable candidate after having almost 4 years to groom one, that is on them.Nixw try,,,,you shouldn`t post a link and make people think your ,ionk disproves something when it niether supports nor disproves what was said!! --- Fact check -- Unproven!! NOT False!!
From your link --
Again we bump into some problems of literalness, though, because some would argue that a person who has already run up against the limits of the 22nd Amendment isn’t “constitutionally ineligible” to be President (i.e., that person doesn’t fail to meet one or more of the requirements specified in Article II of the constitution, such as being at least 35 years old or a natural-born citizen of the United States) but is merely constitutionally ineligible to be elected President. Under this interpretation, a former two-term President would still be eligible, under the law, to obtain and hold the office of Vice President through election or appointment to that position.
Ultimately, the only answer to this hypothetical is that there is no answer: this is an interpretive legal issue that, should it ever arise, would have to be decided by the judicial branch of the U.S. government.
We can agree to disagree! I am sorry but there is nothing improper about Biden asking Obama to Biden`s VP!! The wording against a sitting president serving another tewrm is true! But in this case the wording does use the word "elected" which if Biden were to die while in office and Obama was the VP would mean Obama could be the President! Why? Because he was NOT elected!While what you say is true, it is obvious that the intent of the amendment limiting terms is to prevent a president from serving more than two terms. Nominating Obama would be such an obvious way of trying to circumvent this that I think people would rebel in droves. It really is the kind of thing that Trump and the republicans would do. If the dems cant come up with a viable candidate after having almost 4 years to groom one, that is on them.
In speech, Biden shows how a normal president responds in crisis
For months, commentators have wondered whether there will be a return to normality after President Trump leaves office, writes David Gergen. In his substantive address Thursday on the coronavirus pandemic, Joe Biden left no doubt that if elected, that's exactly what he intends.www.cnn.com
Joe's starting to look pretty godammned Presidential.
That could be true, but what I think Vic was pointing out was that Biden made no mis-steps in his last speech and spoke very clearly and like a man with all his mental facilities!! To which I agree!! Biden sounded way more Presidential than I have ever heard him sound!!Sanders offered clearer solutions.
Sounds like "damning with faint praise" to me. Pretty sad that every time Biden speaks coherently it is taken as a positive. That should be a given.That could be true, but what I think Vic was pointing out was that Biden made no mis-steps in his last speech and spoke very clearly and like a man with all his mental facilities!! To which I agree!! Biden sounded way more Presidential than I have ever heard him sound!!
I'm not saying Trump is a better choice, he isn't. I'm saying he will Win.
Sounds like "damning with faint praise" to me. Pretty sad that every time Biden speaks coherently it is taken as a positive. That should be a given.
And dont forget this was a prepared speech, not something that required reasoned, coherent responses under pressure (like the debates with Trump will).
And you'll make that a self fulfilling prophecy if possible.
Sounds like "damning with faint praise" to me. Pretty sad that every time Biden speaks coherently it is taken as a positive. That should be a given.
And dont forget this was a prepared speech, not something that required reasoned, coherent responses under pressure (like the debates with Trump will).
No, Biden will fulfill that "prophecy". You're being Hillary again.