John Edwards is a liar

Page 3 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Feb 10, 2000
30,029
67
91
Originally posted by: Ozoned

Oh and Don Vito, since you are the one that fanned the fire against Rip, I thought I would find a custom avator for you also. But I can't seem to find one that represents a steaming pile of dog sh!t.


Thanks for your support!

Come back when you can formulate a signature that makes some sense.
 

conjur

No Lifer
Jun 7, 2001
58,686
3
0
Originally posted by: Ozoned
Originally posted by: conjur
yeah...I can see where exposing a troll is funny.






Care to point out where any of the "group of liberal hypocrits" have trolled?

Already did that earlier. Thank you..

Oh?

Let's look at your first post in this thread (the one to which I replied with the above:

Originally posted by: Ozoned
Originally posted by: busmaster11
If Rip is watching, and I'm sure he is...

I would imagine this is quite embarassing for him...


Oh, I don't know. To me, watching a group of liberal hypocrits exposing their true nature is fvcking Hilarious..




So, I ask again:

Care to point out where any of the "group of liberal hypocrits" have trolled?
 

Ozoned

Diamond Member
Mar 22, 2004
5,578
0
0
Originally posted by: conjur
Originally posted by: Ozoned
Originally posted by: conjur
yeah...I can see where exposing a troll is funny.






Care to point out where any of the "group of liberal hypocrits" have trolled?

Already did that earlier. Thank you..

Oh?

Let's look at your first post in this thread (the one to which I replied with the above:

Originally posted by: Ozoned
Originally posted by: busmaster11
If Rip is watching, and I'm sure he is...

I would imagine this is quite embarassing for him...


Oh, I don't know. To me, watching a group of liberal hypocrits exposing their true nature is fvcking Hilarious..




So, I ask again:

Care to point out where (any) of the "group of liberal hypocrits" have trolled?

Already answered.

Btw, when I said "watching a group of liberal hypocrits exposing their true nature"

I was referring to the killing squad that has formed to run off Rip, that does appear to be the only way that this particular group can compete. Look at the last 3 or 4 threads by Rip. Same people. Same theme. Same squirming. Same hypocrisy.

It is very odd that you always conveniently end up along for the ride..
 

conjur

No Lifer
Jun 7, 2001
58,686
3
0
Originally posted by: Ozoned
Originally posted by: conjur
Originally posted by: Ozoned
Originally posted by: conjur
yeah...I can see where exposing a troll is funny.






Care to point out where any of the "group of liberal hypocrits" have trolled?

Already did that earlier. Thank you..

Oh?

Let's look at your first post in this thread (the one to which I replied with the above:

Originally posted by: Ozoned
Originally posted by: busmaster11
If Rip is watching, and I'm sure he is...

I would imagine this is quite embarassing for him...


Oh, I don't know. To me, watching a group of liberal hypocrits exposing their true nature is fvcking Hilarious..




So, I ask again:

Care to point out where (any) of the "group of liberal hypocrits" have trolled?

Already answered.

Btw, when I said "watching a group of liberal hypocrits exposing their true nature"

I was referring to the killing squad that has formed to run off Rip, that does appear to be the only way that this particular group can compete. Look at the last 3 or 4 threads by Rip. Same people. Same theme. Same squirming. Same hypocrisy.

It is very odd that you always conveniently end up along for the ride..

That's not an answer.

Show me one post that proves a "liberal hypocrit" being a troll.

Come on...if it's so easy it should take you no time at all. And, no, this thread doesn't count. In order to be a hypocrit one must be guilty of a post in another thread equivalent to what one is complaining about in this thread.
 

busmaster11

Platinum Member
Mar 4, 2000
2,875
0
0
Originally posted by: Ozoned
Originally posted by: conjur
yeah...I can see where exposing a troll is funny.






Care to point out where any of the "group of liberal hypocrits" have trolled?

Already did that earlier. Thank you..


Oh and Don Vito, since you are the one that fanned the fire against Rip, I thought I would find a custom avator for you also. But I can't seem to find one that represents a steaming pile of dog sh!t.


I hope you weren't referring to our little exchange, because I'd hate to see you come in here and insist that when you're the one who ended up having to step off after biting off more than you can chew.
 

villager

Senior member
Oct 17, 2002
373
0
0
Edwards mistake, believing in Bush's CIA. Funny how that never gets brought up. But is Edwards is a liar, then what does tha make Bush and his whole administration?
 

Ozoned

Diamond Member
Mar 22, 2004
5,578
0
0
Originally posted by: conjur
That's not an answer.


You have, in this thread, defined what conjur believes a troll is and have twisted the definition of what a hypocrite is and asked me to prove something based upon your definitions of what the two things are. I won't play your game.


I will however share what I see as hypocrisy.

The Liberals have laid claim to be the guardians of the people and they talk of noble things such as free speech, freedom of expression, and personal individualism. There are many instances of these actions being argued for adamantly on this forum. Additionaly,there are many arguments against any action that would take away any part of these rights. A lot of "what ifs" have been brought up in the arguments, and it is always the position of the liberals that personal rights and the freedom of speech are, to a very high degree, above anything else.

It is often asserted on this forum, that Conservatives do not value these things, That are values are indefensible, and That we do not care about our fellow man.

The proof I provide of liberal hypocrisy is evidenced by this thread and the last few threads in which there has been an effort put forth to silence Riprorin. Even worse is the method chosen to carry out the attempt. Name calling, attempting to humiliate. And why not try? It worked with Hs and probably countless others.

Aren't these also things that liberals loudly vocalize their opposition to.

Now, which members are defending the values I spoke of and which members are carrying out the attack on those values?

And please, spare me the "I'm a conservative" crap..
 

Perknose

Forum Director & Omnipotent Overlord
Forum Director
Oct 9, 1999
46,737
10,271
146
Originally posted by: DonVito
Originally posted by: Ozoned

Oh and Don Vito, since you are the one that fanned the fire against Rip, I thought I would find a custom avator for you also. But I can't seem to find one that represents a steaming pile of dog sh!t.


Thanks for your support!

Come back when you can formulate a signature that makes some sense.
AHAHAHAHAHHA, as always, you're right, Don Vito, O's sig is either gramatically or logically retarded, and he doesn't even realize it!
I find it useful to have an array of opinions before I form my own.
Yo, 'zoned, you can't have even one opinion, let alone an entire array, before you form/have your own, unless you live in your own non-linear fantasyland!

Just put "before me" between "opinions" and "before" in your quote or "other's" before "opinions", in which case you'd have to change your verb "have" to something like "survey". :shocked:
 

Ozoned

Diamond Member
Mar 22, 2004
5,578
0
0
Originally posted by: Perknose
Originally posted by: DonVito
Originally posted by: Ozoned

Oh and Don Vito, since you are the one that fanned the fire against Rip, I thought I would find a custom avator for you also. But I can't seem to find one that represents a steaming pile of dog sh!t.


Thanks for your support!

Come back when you can formulate a signature that makes some sense.
AHAHAHAHAHHA, as always, you're right, Don Vito, O's sig is either gramatically or logically retarded, and he doesn't even realize it!
I find it useful to have an array of opinions before I form my own.
Yo, 'zoned, you can't have even one opinion, let alone an entire array, before you form/have your own, unless you live in your own non-linear fantasyland!

Just put "before me" between "opinions" and "before" in your quote or "other's" before "opinions", in which case you'd have to change your verb "have" to something like "survey". :shocked:


Ayup, that is exactly what Don Vito told me in a pm and that is almost exactly what he told me I should do about my sig. Hmmmmmmmmm.



Since the two of you have the same mentality and share the same obsession with my sig, why don't you use the little search thingy, and see if you can figure out the meaning to my sig. Might be a bit of a strain on your liberal brains, but I'll be rooting for you.
 

busmaster11

Platinum Member
Mar 4, 2000
2,875
0
0
Originally posted by: Ozoned
The proof I provide of liberal hypocrisy is evidenced by this thread and the last few threads in which there has been an effort put forth to silence Riprorin.

In order to make that argument you would have to completely ignore the fact that the man consistently ignores every attempt at an intelligent debate, chosing instead to provide links in the hopes that they will reveal what he doesn't know to support his case, or quit his thread altogether hoping guys like you and Cad will take up for him, only to start another.

This has always been the charge. Yes you may say any number of us has done it before, but there's no denying he's made a habit of it in particular.
 

rchiu

Diamond Member
Jun 8, 2002
3,846
0
0
Originally posted by: AcidicFury
Originally posted by: Harvey

Rip -- Give it up, and rejoin the human race! You're pissing in the wind, trying to defend the failed, shallow, empty policies of an intellectually and morally bankrupt bunch of liars and crooks with nothing to offer but a lust for greed and power.

Exactly. Please stop Riporin.

Hehe, it is actually entertaining to see how desperate people like Riprorin are, when they start using any possible excuse from any source out there. Just have fun with it and don't take it seriously. It is his time if he want to waste it to show everyone how idiotic he is thinking his post achieves something.

While we are on the topic, one got to wonder Riprorin either have absolutely no life outside of this forum or he is paid to spread propaganda in this forum. I mean come on, who actually have time to find all those articles, post them and talk about them every single day. Either way, it is pretty pathetic.

Anyway, it is his time, his life, let him waste it if he wants to.
 

Vic

Elite Member
Jun 12, 2001
50,422
14,337
136
Originally posted by: CADkindaGUY
:roll: You people need to get a clue. You'd be all over Bush for something similar yet here you sit claiming Rip is "trolling", infact some of you have infact posted similar things.
Sudheer - if Rip should be "banned" then you should have been gone long ago. Someday maybe you'll be something other than a little bandwagon cheerleader....maybe....someday...

CkG
IIRC, GHW Bush said the same thing in 1980, that he would not consider running as VP. Lots of bad blood in the Republican primaries that year I seem to recall. Conveniently all patched up by the convention though of course, such being the way of politics.

But no, I don't think Rip should be banned simply for his views. Merely corrected from time to time
Damn straight about Sudheer though...
 

Ozoned

Diamond Member
Mar 22, 2004
5,578
0
0
Originally posted by: busmaster11
Originally posted by: Ozoned
The proof I provide of liberal hypocrisy is evidenced by this thread and the last few threads in which there has been an effort put forth to silence Riprorin.

In order to make that argument you would have to completely ignore the fact that the man consistently ignores every attempt at an intelligent debate, chosing instead to provide links in the hopes that they will reveal what he doesn't know to support his case, or quit his thread altogether hoping guys like you and Cad will take up for him, only to start another.

This has always been the charge. Yes you may say any number of us has done it before, but there's no denying he's made a habit of it in particular.


There is no disputing that you have the choice to respond or not respond to any post that you want, I would have to say that the problem is on your side of the fence...?
 
Feb 10, 2000
30,029
67
91
Originally posted by: Ozoned


Ayup, that is exactly what Don Vito told me in a pm and that is almost exactly what he told me I should do about my sig. Hmmmmmmmmm.



Since the two of you have the same mentality and share the same obsession with my sig, why don't you use the little search thingy, and see if you can figure out the meaning to my sig. Might be a bit of a strain on your liberal brains, but I'll be rooting for you.

It shouldn't surprise you that nobody thinks enough about you to search for the origin of your cryptic sig. I must say I find it a little ironic, in that I've never seen any evidence of you considering anyone else's opinion, or even hearing it out. Perhaps you should substitute "mock" for "have" - then it would all fit together like a jigsaw puzzle.

So did you form the opinion that I'm a steaming pile of poo, or do you just have it?
 

Ozoned

Diamond Member
Mar 22, 2004
5,578
0
0
Originally posted by: Vic


But no, I don't think Rip should be banned simply for his views. Merely corrected from time to time
Damn straight about Sudheer though...

No, That is unacceptable. Not Sudheer or any poster. I would equate banning a poster based upon their views to>>>> jailing a citizen for expressing his opinions....
 

conjur

No Lifer
Jun 7, 2001
58,686
3
0
Originally posted by: Ozoned
Originally posted by: conjur
That's not an answer.


You have, in this thread, defined what conjur believes a troll is and have twisted the definition of what a hypocrite is and asked me to prove something based upon your definitions of what the two things are. I won't play your game.


I will however share what I see as hypocrisy.

The Liberals have laid claim to be the guardians of the people and they talk of noble things such as free speech, freedom of expression, and personal individualism. There are many instances of these actions being argued for adamantly on this forum. Additionaly,there are many arguments against any action that would take away any part of these rights. A lot of "what ifs" have been brought up in the arguments, and it is always the position of the liberals that personal rights and the freedom of speech are, to a very high degree, above anything else.

It is often asserted on this forum, that Conservatives do not value these things, That are values are indefensible, and That we do not care about our fellow man.

The proof I provide of liberal hypocrisy is evidenced by this thread and the last few threads in which there has been an effort put forth to silence Riprorin. Even worse is the method chosen to carry out the attempt. Name calling, attempting to humiliate. And why not try? It worked with Hs and probably countless others.

Aren't these also things that liberals loudly vocalize their opposition to.

Now, which members are defending the values I spoke of and which members are carrying out the attack on those values?

And please, spare me the "I'm a conservative" crap..

I'm still waiting for the proof.

All I'm seeing from you is opinion.
 

conjur

No Lifer
Jun 7, 2001
58,686
3
0
Originally posted by: Ozoned
Since the two of you have the same mentality and share the same obsession with my sig, why don't you use the little search thingy, and see if you can figure out the meaning to my sig. Might be a bit of a strain on your liberal brains, but I'll be rooting for you.

http://forums.anandtech.com/messageview.cfm?catid=52&threadid=1325215

That thread where the Republican Policy document got ripped to shreds by exposing its rhetoric?
 

Vic

Elite Member
Jun 12, 2001
50,422
14,337
136
Originally posted by: Ozoned
Originally posted by: Vic
But no, I don't think Rip should be banned simply for his views. Merely corrected from time to time
Damn straight about Sudheer though...
No, That is unacceptable. Not Sudheer or any poster. I would equate banning a poster based upon their views to>>>> jailing a citizen for expressing his opinions....
You missed my point. I wasn't saying that anyone should be banned for their views. Just agreeing that if Rip were to be banned that Sudheer Anne should too. No more.
 

Ozoned

Diamond Member
Mar 22, 2004
5,578
0
0
Originally posted by: conjur
Originally posted by: Ozoned
Since the two of you have the same mentality and share the same obsession with my sig, why don't you use the little search thingy, and see if you can figure out the meaning to my sig. Might be a bit of a strain on your liberal brains, but I'll be rooting for you.

http://forums.anandtech.com/messageview.cfm?catid=52&threadid=1325215

That thread where the Republican Policy document got ripped to shreds by exposing its rhetoric?


I'll be rooting for you, also.
 
Feb 10, 2000
30,029
67
91
Originally posted by: conjur

http://forums.anandtech.com/messageview.cfm?catid=52&threadid=1325215

That thread where the Republican Policy document got ripped to shreds by exposing its rhetoric?

LOL - so his incoherent, linguistically-challenged sig is a quote of one of his own incoherent, linguistically-challenged posts? I should have known - Ozoned isn't just the only person who understands Ozoned, Ozoned only understands Ozoned.

O-man, you are a breed apart!
 

Ozoned

Diamond Member
Mar 22, 2004
5,578
0
0
Originally posted by: DonVito
Originally posted by: conjur

http://forums.anandtech.com/messageview.cfm?catid=52&threadid=1325215

That thread where the Republican Policy document got ripped to shreds by exposing its rhetoric?

LOL - so his incoherent, linguistically-challenged sig is a quote of one of his own incoherent, linguistically-challenged posts? I should have known - Ozoned isn't just the only person who understands Ozoned, Ozoned only understands Ozoned.

O-man, you are a breed apart!

Every insult you direct at me is one less that you can direct elsewhere. That is a good thing.

Now I must run along and clean off the bottom of my shoe
 

happyhelper

Senior member
Feb 20, 2002
344
0
0
Originally posted by: DealMonkey(B) Regarding Edward's words on Saddam/Iraq -- again, isn't it quite obvious? He saw the same flawed intel that everyone else saw. Remember that scathing Senate Intel Committee report that just came out? Yeah that one. The one in which they suggest that they would have never voted for war if they knew now what they knew then about the threat posed by Iraq.

Dealmonkey, it's not just that, man. Even if a person on the Senate Intelligence Committee was dubious of the information before him (and he probably was if he looked at it critically, at all), he would still have been committing political suicide to have said anything other than he believed Saddam was the next Hitler.

To exemplify my point, what did France do that was soooo wrong? It('s leaders) said Bush was lying; that they didn't believe Bush's evidence and didn't support his plan based on that evidence. And for that, everyone in the US thought it would be a good idea to call French Fries freedom fries and to boycott and hate everything French. And about 100% of the 85% of the brainwashed Americans who supported/loved/approved of Bush at the time still HATE France, even though France was Right!

So for a US politician, it would have been no different. Any politician who had said that, like France, would be a laughing stock, still stigmatized as a US hater for a very long time, even though he would have been right.

For me, it was no different, I disagreed with the President at the time, verbally, on forums and amongst many peers, and I'll tell you what, telling the truth, can, at times, really make people hate you. I was called everything from a traitor to a terrorist to a communist or liberal in the most hurtful ways possible. I was told if I hate America so much I should leave, even though I love America and just didn't believe the hollow lies of the President. And even more than I love this country, I love freedom, and as long as this country provides it to me, I'm here to stay.

To sum it all up, Senators and Congressmen like the jobs they have, and can not be expected to point out the Emperor is wearing no clothes any more than the emperor himself would point it out; not while the emperor is extremely popular.

Originally posted by: IndieSnob
Wow, so he changed his mind about becoming vice president, and that makes him a liar? Talk about grasping for straws.

Somehow, saying "well if I lose to Kerry, I'll join him" doesn't seem like the right answer to give... Obviously, Riprotten is an idiot troll. At least he makes a good devil's advocate. I think he's on AT's payroll.

As to the Iraq thing, we all know that most on the left and right beleived that Sadaam had wmd's, or at least the capabilities.

Again, I don't think everyone believed it as earnestly as Bush's faithful, but what politician could be expected to risk/trash his political career to say so?

The problem came when the Intel was bad, that Bush was so war hungry that he wouldn't take the time to see if intel was bad and let the un find out the rest etc etc. That's ok though, keep on grasping for straws, you're desparation shows.

The problem came before that, it came on 911, when Bush told his entire administration to "tie these attacks to Iraq." During an interview on CBS?s 60 Minutes that aired in March, President Bush?s former Anti-Terrorism Tsar Richard A. Clarke came out and confirmed that there was never a link to Al Qaeda. The CIA, the FBI, and himself repeatedly told Cabinet members this, but to no avail. He also described conversations with the President, in which he was told repeatedly to find Al Qaeda connections. He said that every time he and other intelligence experts checked, they came back empty-handed. President Bush kept telling them to look harder, but time after time Clarke, the CIA, and the FBI found no connection.

Bush lied about it anyway, and used intel he knew was false to convince our country to conquer Iraq.

Everybody believes Bush's Latest Lie, that the intel community screwed up. It's total bullshit... the intel community knows and knew the facts at the time, but the President Covered Them Up For His Own Agenda and Lied. He is using the intel community as a fall guy, just like Reagan used Oliver North as a fall guy. North's reward was a political makeover (in his state he came out smelling like roses for "taking one for the gipper") and an unlimited campaign warchest from the Republican Party, for as long as he wanted to be in politics. The intel community's reward for taking the flak will be millions/billions of new money ostensibly to "improve" the various agencies.
 

Riprorin

Banned
Apr 25, 2000
9,634
0
0
He is using the intel community as a fall guy, just like Reagan used Oliver North as a fall guy. North's reward was a political makeover (in his state he came out smelling like roses for "taking one for the gipper") and an unlimited campaign warchest from the Republican Party, for as long as he wanted to be in politics. The intel community's reward for taking the flak will be millions/billions of new money ostensibly to "improve" the various agencies.

With all due respect, it sounds like you've never heard President Reagan's Iran Contra speech.

Let me share it with you:

Iran-Contra

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
President Reagan addressed the nation from the White House concerning Iran-Contra on March 4th, 1987
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

My fellow Americans: I've spoken to you from this historic office on many occasions and about many things. The power of the Presidency is often thought to reside within this Oval Office. Yet it doesn't rest here; it rests in you, the American people, and in your trust. Your trust is what gives a president his powers of leadership and his personal strength, and it's what I want to talk to you about this evening.

For the past three months, I've been silent on the revelations about Iran. And you must have been thinking: "Well, why doesn't he tell us what's happening? Why doesn't he just speak to us as he has in the past when we've faced troubles or tragedies?" Others of you, I guess, were thinking: "What's he doing hiding out in the White House?" Well, the reason I haven't spoken to you before now is this: You deserve the truth. And as frustrating as the waiting has been, I felt it was improper to come to you with sketchy reports, or possibly even erroneous statements, which would then have to be corrected, creating even more doubt and confusion. There's been enough of that. I've paid a price for my silence in terms of your trust and confidence. But I've had to wait, as you have, for the complete story. That's why I appointed Ambassador David Abshire as my Special Counselor to help get out the thousands of documents to the various investigations. And I appointed a Special Review Board, the Tower Board, which took on the chore of pulling the truth together for me and getting to the bottom of things. It has now issued its findings.

I'm often accused of being an optimist, and it's true I had to hunt pretty hard to find any good news in the Board's report. As you know, it's well stocked with criticisms, which I'll discuss in a moment; but I was very relieved to read this sentence: "...the Board is convinced that the President does indeed want the full story to be told. " And that will continue to be my pledge to you as the other investigations go forward. I want to thank the members of the panel: former Senator John Tower, former Secretary of State Edmund Muskie, and former national security advisor Brent Scowcroft. They have done the nation, as well as me personally, a great service by submitting a report of such integrity and depth. They have my genuine and enduring gratitude.

I've studied the Board's report. Its findings are honest, convincing, and highly critical; and I accept them. And tonight I want to share with you my thoughts on these findings and report to you on the actions I'm taking to implement the Board's recommendations. First, let me say, I take full responsibility for my own actions and for those of my administration. As angry as I may be about activities undertaken without my knowledge, I am still accountable for those activities. As disappointed as I may be in some who served me, I'm still the one who must answer to the American people for this behavior. And as personally distasteful as I find secret bank accounts and diverted funds?well, as the Navy would say, this happened on my watch.

Let's start with the part that is the most controversial. A few months ago I told the American people I did not trade arms for hostages. My heart and my best intentions still tell me that's true, but the facts and the evidence tell me it is not. As the Tower Board reported, what began as a strategic opening to Iran deteriorated, in its implementation, into trading arms for hostages. This runs counter to my own beliefs, to administration policy, and the original strategy we had in mind. There are reasons why it happened, but no excuses. It was a mistake. I undertook the original Iran initiative in order to develop relations with those who might assume leadership in a post-Khomeini government.

It's clear from the Board's report, however, that I let my personal concern for the hostages spill over into the geopolitical strategy of reaching out to Iran. I asked so many questions about the hostages' welfare that I didn't ask enough about the specifics of the total Iran plan. Let me say to the hostage families: We have not given up. We never will. And I promise you we'll use every legitimate means to free your loved ones from captivity. But I must also caution that those Americans who freely remain in such dangerous areas must know that they're responsible for their own safety.

Now, another major aspect of the Board's findings regards the transfer of funds to the Nicaraguan Contras. The Tower Board wasn't able to find out what happened to this money, so the facts here will be left to the continuing investigations of the court-appointed Independent Counsel and the two congressional investigating communities. I'm confident the truth will come out about this matter, as well. As I told the Tower Board, I didn't know about any diversion of funds to the Contras. But as president, I cannot escape responsibility.

Much has been said about my management style, a style that's worked successfully for me during eight years as governor of California and for most of my Presidency. The way I work is to identify the problem, find the right individuals to do the job, and then let them go to it. I've found this invariably brings out the best in people. They seem to rise to their full capability, and in the long run you get more done. When it came to managing the NSC staff, let's face it, my style didn't match its previous track record. I've already begun correcting this. As a start, yesterday I met with the entire professional staff of the National Security Council. I defined for them the values I want to guide the national security policies of this country. I told them that I wanted a policy that was as justifiable and understandable in public as it was in secret. I wanted a policy that reflected the will of the Congress as well as the White House. And I told them that there'll be no more freelancing by individuals when it comes to our national security.

You've heard a lot about the staff of the National Security Council in recent months. Well, I can tell you, they are good and dedicated government employees, who put in long hours for the nation's benefit. They are eager and anxious to serve their country. One thing still upsetting me, however, is that no one kept proper records of meetings or decisions. This led to my failure to recollect whether I approved an arms shipment before or after the fact. I did approve it; I just can't say specifically when. Well, rest assured, there's plenty of record- keeping now going on at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue.

For nearly a week now, I've been studying the Board's report. I want the American people to know that this wrenching ordeal of recent months has not been in vain. I endorse every one of the Tower Board's recommendations. In fact, I'm going beyond its recommendations so as to put the house in even better order. I'm taking action in three basic areas: personnel, national security policy, and the process for making sure that the system works.

First, personnel?I've brought in an accomplished and highly respected new team here at the White House. They bring new blood, new energy, and new credibility and experience. Former Senator Howard Baker, my new Chief of Staff, possesses a breadth of legislative and foreign affairs skills that's impossible to match. I'm hopeful that his experience as minority and majority leader of the Senate can help us forge a new partnership with the Congress, especially on foreign and national security policies. I'm genuinely honored that he's given up his own presidential aspirations to serve the country as my Chief of Staff. Frank Carlucci, my new national security advisor, is respected for his experience in government and trusted for his judgment and counsel. Under him, the NSC is being rebuilt with the proper management discipline. Already, almost half the NSC professional staff is comprised of new people.

Yesterday, I nominated Wi11iam Webster, a man of sterling reputation, to be Director of the Central Intelligence Agency. Mr. Webster has served as Director of the FBI and as a U.S. District Court judge. He understands the meaning of "rule of law." So that his knowledge of national security matters can be available to me on a continuing basis, I wi11 so appoint John Tower to serve as a member of my Foreign Intelligence Advisory Board. I am considering other changes in personnel, and I'll move more furniture, as I see fit, in the weeks and months ahead.

Second, in the area of national security policy, I have ordered the NSC to begin a comprehensive review of all covert operations. I have also directed that any covert activity be in support of clear policy objectives and in compliance with American values. I expect a covert policy that, if Americans saw it on the front page of their newspaper, they'd say, "That makes sense." I have had issued a directive prohibiting the NSC staff itself from undertaking covert operations?no "ifs," "ands," or "buts." I have asked Vice President Bush to reconvene his task force on terrorism to review our terrorist policy in light of the events that have occurred.

Third, in terms of the process of reaching national security decisions, I am adopting in total the Tower Report's model of how the NSC process and staff should work. I am directing Mr. Carlucci to take the necessary steps to make that happen. He will report back to me on further reforms that might be needed. I've created the post of NSC legal advisor to assure a greater sensitivity to matters of the law. I am also determined to make the congressional oversight process work. Proper procedures for consultation with the Congress will be followed, not only in letter but in spirit. Before the end of March, I will report to the Congress on all the steps I've taken in line with the Tower Board's conclusions.

Now, what should happen when you make a mistake is this: You take your knocks, you learn your lessons, and then you move on. That's the healthiest way to deal with a problem. This in no way diminishes the importance of the other continuing investigations, but the business of our country and our people must proceed. I've gotten this message from Republicans and Democrats in Congress, from allies around the world, and?if we're reading the signals right?even from the Soviets. And of course, I've heard the message from you, the American people. You know, by the time you reach my age, you've made plenty of mistakes. And if you've lived your life properly?so, you learn. You put things in perspective. You pull your energies together. You change. You go forward.

My fellow Americans, I have a great deal that I want to accomplish with you and for you over the next two years. And the Lord willing, that's exactly what I intend to do. Good night, and God bless you.
 
sale-70-410-exam    | Exam-200-125-pdf    | we-sale-70-410-exam    | hot-sale-70-410-exam    | Latest-exam-700-603-Dumps    | Dumps-98-363-exams-date    | Certs-200-125-date    | Dumps-300-075-exams-date    | hot-sale-book-C8010-726-book    | Hot-Sale-200-310-Exam    | Exam-Description-200-310-dumps?    | hot-sale-book-200-125-book    | Latest-Updated-300-209-Exam    | Dumps-210-260-exams-date    | Download-200-125-Exam-PDF    | Exam-Description-300-101-dumps    | Certs-300-101-date    | Hot-Sale-300-075-Exam    | Latest-exam-200-125-Dumps    | Exam-Description-200-125-dumps    | Latest-Updated-300-075-Exam    | hot-sale-book-210-260-book    | Dumps-200-901-exams-date    | Certs-200-901-date    | Latest-exam-1Z0-062-Dumps    | Hot-Sale-1Z0-062-Exam    | Certs-CSSLP-date    | 100%-Pass-70-383-Exams    | Latest-JN0-360-real-exam-questions    | 100%-Pass-4A0-100-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-300-135-exams-date    | Passed-200-105-Tech-Exams    | Latest-Updated-200-310-Exam    | Download-300-070-Exam-PDF    | Hot-Sale-JN0-360-Exam    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Exams    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-JN0-360-exams-date    | Exam-Description-1Z0-876-dumps    | Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps    | Dumps-HPE0-Y53-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-HPE0-Y53-Exam    | 100%-Pass-HPE0-Y53-Real-Exam-Questions    | Pass-4A0-100-Exam    | Latest-4A0-100-Questions    | Dumps-98-365-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-98-365-Exam    | 100%-Pass-VCS-254-Exams    | 2017-Latest-VCS-273-Exam    | Dumps-200-355-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-300-320-Exam    | Pass-300-101-Exam    | 100%-Pass-300-115-Exams    |
http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    | http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    |