Was called twice, but only had to serve once.
It can be entertaining and enlightening, as well as eye-opening as to the things that foul and clog our legal system..
Fella was suing Hertz Truck Rentals' insurance carrier.
Seems he was hit from behind by one of their rental trucks, that just happened to be driven by a friend of his, that just happened to have fled the state. And now he had permanent injuries and mental suffering that demanded a 7 digit settlement.
Yea, a '68 Olds 88 at a dead stop, hit by a Ford box van supposedly going 40 mph, supposedly booted the Olds 100'+ down and off the I-95 exit ramp into the bushes and trees, with not so much as a broken taillight on the Olds.
Ford box van then fled the scene and was returned to Hertz with no mention of an accident.
No damage was noted to the Ford box van on the Hertz return check-in sheet either.
(If you have ever rented from Hertz, you know they are brutal on finding even a door ding to charge you for at check-in)
We sat through 4 days of testimony, doctors, photo evidence, and cross-exam, and then after a short deliberation, we asked the judge, in open court, if we could charge the plaintiff with insurance fraud.
He chuckled and asked if we had meant to say "we find the defendant not guilty". The Foreman said "Yes" and most in the courtroom snickered.
Almost forgot, one of the plaintiff's witnesses, was escorted to the court by Sheriff's Deputys, since he was in County Jail for insurance fraud