The bottom line is that handguns are not very good at killing people. The advantages of 9mm (much larger ammo capacity, faster follow up shots) outweigh the slight increase in damage done by the .45.
Not to mention that .45 ammo costs like 50-75% more than 9mm.
And now I want to buy a pistol. I have always wanted a Glock for some reason and I am wanting a G23. I dont want a full size or subcompact. What are your favorites and what about your suggestions?
Only weiners choose 9mm over.45acp.
Besides best self defense handgun is a 410 revolver!
Your name is sixguns and you don't already own a gun, much less a wheel gun?
I do own a shotgun but my wife has never wanted/allowed me to get more. But since her crackhead little brother is getting bold with his stealing, she wants something here in the house.
You mean the Judge? Pretty much every test I've seen shows that .410 loads are inadequate as a defensive load when fired from it.
OP:
Any compact from the big manufactures will be a good choice. Just ask your self if you think any features/options are necessary. Safety, no safety, mag safety, loaded chamber indicator, picatinny rail, adjustable sights, etc etc.
So he can steal it?
Sure, birdshot out of a 3" barrel isn't going to do shit. I don't know about you though, but I would not want to be shot with 000 buck at <7 yards.
As long as it has a safety its good. Dont really plan on buying a lot of addons maybe just a few more mags and thats it.
Personally, I'd prefer not to be shot by anything larger than an airsoft gun. That doesn't mean that a CO2 pellet gun is effect for defense. Sorry, but from everything I've read the Judge produces really large shot patterns and seriously lacks penetration even when using buckshot.
If I lived in serious snake territory I'd probably consider one for anti-snake duties... but against threats on 2 or 4 legs? Meh.
This will be my first handgun and will mostly be for home defense and going out shooting with friends. Do most gun shops let you try them out first? In my town we have just a little shop with no range and the old guy is crazy. I shot my friends 9mm and subcompact .380 today. The .380 had crazy recoil and was way to small for my hands. The 9mm felt good since it was full size. What would I be looking at as the difference of price between the 9 and 40?
I already know I am going Glock since I know how reliable they are and how they hold their value but I am open to the caliber I select. I know my wife will never shoot the thing because she wants something small due to her being very small.
And lets try to get this back on topic but thats for the post so far. Been a good read.
She needs something easy and useful...I do own a shotgun but my wife has never wanted/allowed me to get more. But since her crackhead little brother is getting bold with his stealing, she wants something here in the house.
So you're trying to say a .22 through the heart is better than a .50 grazing a shoulder?The argument about 9 vs 40 vs 45 is pointless. Shot placement is more important than caliber size.
I have an M&P 45 and was thinking about a M&P 40c next which you can get a conversion barrel, 9mm mag and shoot 9mm through it. Shoot 9 and carry 40.
The Glock has a "true" safety and you must disengage it every single time the weapon is fired. Please don't spread misinformation regarding things you don't understand.
.40 ammo is going to be about 20-30% more expensive than 9mm. Not sure about the price difference for the actual gun.
If it's your first gun you want the 9mm. The recoil is much more pleasant than .40
I don't know why people always say this. I'm pretty weak-handed and I've never noticed a recoil difference between .40 and 9mm. Theres a very slight difference at .45 and .357, but even then hardly much at all. IMO, the difference between .38 special and .357 mag/.45 is so small that if you can't comfortable shoot at LEAST .357/.45, you shouldn't be shooting.