BenSkywalker
Diamond Member
- Oct 9, 1999
- 9,140
- 67
- 91
When looking for the best CRT what spec's are you looking for.
I see allot of CRT's with the same spec's as the NEC for allot cheaper.
It depends on what you are looking for. Speaking for myself, anything that doesn't support 2048x1536 is completely out of the question. Then, ideally I want to see a refresh rate of 85Hz supported(higher would be nice, unfortunately graphics cards don't support any higher). That is simply a baseline, anything that can't hit that is out of the question.
Next would be preference of tube. If you want the sharpest text, shadow masks tend to have a slight edge in the CRT relm. If you want the most vibrant images(without color bleeding or inaccuracies) then aperture grill is the way to go. These are more matters of degress when looking at the highest end monitors, although at the highest end AG is pretty much all there is(not quite, but pretty much).
Then you have the question of which brand of tube it is that you want. IMO the Diamondtron tube products are the best- I don't like the convergence on the Trinitrons and I haven't been particularly impressed with any single element of the DynaFlats(although I'm sure you can find advocates for those too). Those are it that you are going to find on the market as far as I am aware(and those are getting hard to find). If you buy a monitor from Dell, IBM, SGI or whoever else it is going to have one of those tubes in it. A big difference in the price comes from features, shielding and tuning. The last element, tuning, is one that you can't put a specification on unless you get in to precission calibrated displays(that cost significantly more then what we are talking about) however it has an enormous impact on the quality. You may find two displays with the same tube, same exact specifications even made by the same company with one costing considerably more(although they rarely do this, most of the time they will take tubes with higher levels of tuning and allow them to run at the resolution and refresh rate they are capable of rather then 'limiting' them to lower). As an example, the 2111 is the exact same tube as the 2141, but the 2141 doesn't have the artifical limitations of resolution they put on the 2111(which can be overcome easily) or the level of tuning put in to the top tier(which can NOT be overcome easily at all).