- Jul 26, 2002
- 11,757
- 0
- 71
Originally posted by: Confusednewbie1552
So....Should I move to the Middle East while I can before getting fvcked.....
Nah, cause we are just gonna take their sh!t.
Originally posted by: Confusednewbie1552
So....Should I move to the Middle East while I can before getting fvcked.....
Originally posted by: Confusednewbie1552
So....Should I move to the Middle East while I can before getting fvcked.....
Originally posted by: mettleh3d
pretty scary
edit: im guessing ^^ didnt read the entire thing. or even the 1st 1/2
Originally posted by: Confusednewbie1552
Nice to know that there is some hope, hopefully it's not false.
Originally posted by: Cuda1447
Read here, its kinda long
It talks about what will happen when oil reaches peak production, which should be soon. Some pretty crazy stuff, if it is true. Not sure what to believe though, because Im not well informed enough on the subject. Just trying to keep an open mind right now.
Im curious as to what you guys think of this though...
Originally posted by: BurnItDwn
Originally posted by: Cuda1447
Read here, its kinda long
It talks about what will happen when oil reaches peak production, which should be soon. Some pretty crazy stuff, if it is true. Not sure what to believe though, because Im not well informed enough on the subject. Just trying to keep an open mind right now.
Im curious as to what you guys think of this though...
This sounds like what people have been saying since the 80s. And Oil prices have gone up a bit, but still haven't kept up with inflation. I am not overly concerned. The world will not come crashing down at once. The amount of oil produced will peak in about 10 years or so, and demand will outstrip supply. The higher the cost for oil gets, the more money that will be pumped into alternatives.
According to a BUNCH or sources, Uranium is not in short supply, or in danger of running out. On top of that, there are still thousands of nuclear warheads that can be decommissioned and converted for power generation.
http://www.nuclearfaq.ca/cnf_sectionG.htm
http://www.americanenergyindependence.com/uranium.html
Coal Reserves aren't too bad either .....
http://www.worldenergy.org/wec-geis/publications/reports/ser/coal/coal.asp
Just in the USA alone, 457503 Million Tons have been proven
249994 Million Tons are proven recoverable
997.1 Million tons are mined per year. The US makes more coal then it usus as of current. Assuming we do not discover any more coal at all, and that coal production TRIPLES to account for lack of oil, that still means in the US, our coal will last us nearly 100 years.
Then there's also NG, which I haven't really researched at all, however, it is my understanding that the known reserves are quite high.
So, we will have higher energy costs down the road, but the Nuclear and Coal options are not lost causes or going to help for 1 or 2 years. they will buy us 100+ years worth of "cheap energy" time.
Hopefully within 20 to 30 years we have cold fusion plants up and running (you know, like that prototype one in france that's under construction)
And solar/wind aren't the best in terms of their density, however, as oil costs go up, solar/wind goes down relatively. (Still really high though for the most part).
There is also Hydro power, which may be devastating for nature, however, it is an extremely potent renewable power resource.
For instance, the Hoover dam has a 2,075 megawatt capacity. (more than most nuclear plants)
So, for all of you who are preaching armageddon, and of the world, worried, etc, relax a bit. Thing are going to get tougher, but we still have time. The world is not goiing to come crashing to a halt. It isn't going to be like in "The Road Warrior."
Originally posted by: bthorny
Originally posted by: BurnItDwn
Originally posted by: Cuda1447
Read here, its kinda long
It talks about what will happen when oil reaches peak production, which should be soon. Some pretty crazy stuff, if it is true. Not sure what to believe though, because Im not well informed enough on the subject. Just trying to keep an open mind right now.
Im curious as to what you guys think of this though...
This sounds like what people have been saying since the 80s. And Oil prices have gone up a bit, but still haven't kept up with inflation. I am not overly concerned. The world will not come crashing down at once. The amount of oil produced will peak in about 10 years or so, and demand will outstrip supply. The higher the cost for oil gets, the more money that will be pumped into alternatives.
According to a BUNCH or sources, Uranium is not in short supply, or in danger of running out. On top of that, there are still thousands of nuclear warheads that can be decommissioned and converted for power generation.
http://www.nuclearfaq.ca/cnf_sectionG.htm
http://www.americanenergyindependence.com/uranium.html
Coal Reserves aren't too bad either .....
http://www.worldenergy.org/wec-geis/publications/reports/ser/coal/coal.asp
Just in the USA alone, 457503 Million Tons have been proven
249994 Million Tons are proven recoverable
997.1 Million tons are mined per year. The US makes more coal then it usus as of current. Assuming we do not discover any more coal at all, and that coal production TRIPLES to account for lack of oil, that still means in the US, our coal will last us nearly 100 years.
Then there's also NG, which I haven't really researched at all, however, it is my understanding that the known reserves are quite high.
So, we will have higher energy costs down the road, but the Nuclear and Coal options are not lost causes or going to help for 1 or 2 years. they will buy us 100+ years worth of "cheap energy" time.
Hopefully within 20 to 30 years we have cold fusion plants up and running (you know, like that prototype one in france that's under construction)
And solar/wind aren't the best in terms of their density, however, as oil costs go up, solar/wind goes down relatively. (Still really high though for the most part).
There is also Hydro power, which may be devastating for nature, however, it is an extremely potent renewable power resource.
For instance, the Hoover dam has a 2,075 megawatt capacity. (more than most nuclear plants)
So, for all of you who are preaching armageddon, and of the world, worried, etc, relax a bit. Thing are going to get tougher, but we still have time. The world is not goiing to come crashing to a halt. It isn't going to be like in "The Road Warrior."
It's such a perfect day....nevermind I doubt you would understand anyway...
Your going to reap just what you sow...
Originally posted by: OS
Originally posted by: bthorny
Originally posted by: BurnItDwn
Originally posted by: Cuda1447
Read here, its kinda long
It talks about what will happen when oil reaches peak production, which should be soon. Some pretty crazy stuff, if it is true. Not sure what to believe though, because Im not well informed enough on the subject. Just trying to keep an open mind right now.
Im curious as to what you guys think of this though...
This sounds like what people have been saying since the 80s. And Oil prices have gone up a bit, but still haven't kept up with inflation. I am not overly concerned. The world will not come crashing down at once. The amount of oil produced will peak in about 10 years or so, and demand will outstrip supply. The higher the cost for oil gets, the more money that will be pumped into alternatives.
According to a BUNCH or sources, Uranium is not in short supply, or in danger of running out. On top of that, there are still thousands of nuclear warheads that can be decommissioned and converted for power generation.
http://www.nuclearfaq.ca/cnf_sectionG.htm
http://www.americanenergyindependence.com/uranium.html
Coal Reserves aren't too bad either .....
http://www.worldenergy.org/wec-geis/publications/reports/ser/coal/coal.asp
Just in the USA alone, 457503 Million Tons have been proven
249994 Million Tons are proven recoverable
997.1 Million tons are mined per year. The US makes more coal then it usus as of current. Assuming we do not discover any more coal at all, and that coal production TRIPLES to account for lack of oil, that still means in the US, our coal will last us nearly 100 years.
Then there's also NG, which I haven't really researched at all, however, it is my understanding that the known reserves are quite high.
So, we will have higher energy costs down the road, but the Nuclear and Coal options are not lost causes or going to help for 1 or 2 years. they will buy us 100+ years worth of "cheap energy" time.
Hopefully within 20 to 30 years we have cold fusion plants up and running (you know, like that prototype one in france that's under construction)
And solar/wind aren't the best in terms of their density, however, as oil costs go up, solar/wind goes down relatively. (Still really high though for the most part).
There is also Hydro power, which may be devastating for nature, however, it is an extremely potent renewable power resource.
For instance, the Hoover dam has a 2,075 megawatt capacity. (more than most nuclear plants)
So, for all of you who are preaching armageddon, and of the world, worried, etc, relax a bit. Thing are going to get tougher, but we still have time. The world is not goiing to come crashing to a halt. It isn't going to be like in "The Road Warrior."
It's such a perfect day....nevermind I doubt you would understand anyway...
Your going to reap just what you sow...
The hell are you talking about, he exposed this stupid argument for the retarded joke that it is.
Originally posted by: Eli
It will only be as bad as he makes it sound if we come up with absolutely no other alternatives.
Oil will not suddenly disappear; the flow won't just shut off like a faucet. Once we peak, and in all likelyhood we already have(since we haven't discovered a major well since the 60s), production will follow the bell curve downwards.
What Peak Oil signifies is the beginning of the end of cheap oil.. Not the end of civilization.
Necessity breeds change. There are other alternatives.. I just hope it's not too late and we can develop them before we actually need them.
Humans as a whole seem incredibly short sighted when it comes to things like that.
The difference is that this should be a gradual 5% decline, rather than a rather instantaneous shock.Originally posted by: Calin
Originally posted by: Eli
It will only be as bad as he makes it sound if we come up with absolutely no other alternatives.
Oil will not suddenly disappear; the flow won't just shut off like a faucet. Once we peak, and in all likelyhood we already have(since we haven't discovered a major well since the 60s), production will follow the bell curve downwards.
What Peak Oil signifies is the beginning of the end of cheap oil.. Not the end of civilization.
Necessity breeds change. There are other alternatives.. I just hope it's not too late and we can develop them before we actually need them.
Humans as a whole seem incredibly short sighted when it comes to things like that.
Have you seen? When the production dropped 5% (in some 1970 I think), the price skyrocketed to 400%.
There won't be any cheap oil, but the price will go up faster than you think. It might be double of what is now in a year, or two years
Originally posted by: Kindjal
I don't think the author contemplates the option of merely killing off large parts of the worlds' population in order to maintain balance and preserve civilization. Obviously a war would reduce populations around the globe but I think something more drastic would be needed.
If all of a sudden the planet had 5 billion less people, I think demand for fossil fuels would stabilize. Of course the kicker is - who is going to volunteer to die so that others can carry on. I don't think we are going to find 5 billion volunteers. Just a solution the author could have mentioned in his rosy scenarios. :evil:
Originally posted by: Zanix
Originally posted by: Kindjal
I don't think the author contemplates the option of merely killing off large parts of the worlds' population in order to maintain balance and preserve civilization. Obviously a war would reduce populations around the globe but I think something more drastic would be needed.
If all of a sudden the planet had 5 billion less people, I think demand for fossil fuels would stabilize. Of course the kicker is - who is going to volunteer to die so that others can carry on. I don't think we are going to find 5 billion volunteers. Just a solution the author could have mentioned in his rosy scenarios. :evil:
what's china's pop. up to now? :evil: