Little Leage OWNAGE!

Page 3 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Eugechi

Junior Member
Mar 7, 2006
21
0
0
Originally posted by: rsd
Originally posted by: Fenixgoon
Originally posted by: Mwilding
Originally posted by: Dragoon42
Link to Ownage"I'm going to work on my batting," he told his dad. "Then maybe someday I'll be the one they walk."
The little runt learned a valuable life lesson that day, and by the attitude he has in that quote, he learned it well. The problem with the world today is that kids are coddled in this naive blanket of "everyone is special" mediocrity.

Harsh words aside, this was a league founded upon the tenets of "everyone is special" mediocrity, and the game should have been played out that way.

in the end, im with dragoon42... kids today dont know how to deal with failure, stress, and demanding situations as well as previous generations iMO. we expect everything to be taken care of for us, the playing field made level for us, etc.

and i bet the coach would have walked the star hitter regardless of who was next. does he want to risk letting that kid score? hell no. if he's the best, whoever's next is worse, and therefore won't have as great a shot at beating them.


I guarantee you that 50 years ago, they would've not walked the kid. Please don't give me any of this BS about hardships and such, it's freaking PONY LEAGUE .
:disgust:

Are you seriously telling me that you would throw away a whole season just to satisfy ONE kid while you have FIFTEEN kids that are YOUR responsibility that finds out it's no fun to lose, especially when they lost INTENTIONALLY.. ?
 

Fern

Elite Member
Sep 30, 2003
26,907
174
106
Originally posted by: PoPPeR
Originally posted by: DBL
I'd have walked the batter. It's your job as coach to put your team in the best position to win.

If the kid is so sick, why have him play in the first place? If he is just a bad player, who also happens to have cancer, then those angry are using his disease as an excuse.
i very highly doubt that very many people agree that a little league's coach primary job is to make sure his team wins.

I feel strongly that a coach at that level has many other more important responsibilities than just making sure his team wins, especially by any means such as walking a good batter.

First, the coach should make sure the kids enjoy the game, at their age thats the most important thing. It encourages them to continue with sports.

They should also help the kids learn good skills, learn teamwork and maybe even some responsibility (although since they can't drive at that age, it may be the parents fault if they miss practice).

I think that "walk" possibly taught the wrong things at that age. I don't believe that coach should be allowed to caoch at this level anymore.

Fern
 

BlancoNino

Diamond Member
Oct 31, 2005
5,695
0
0
I gotta love the Yankee's coach. He makes some great points! Maybe we're related...

"Yanks coach Bob Farley decided to walk the star."

We have confirmation! Distant relative FTW!
 

rsd

Platinum Member
Dec 30, 2003
2,293
0
76
Originally posted by: Eugechi
Originally posted by: rsd
Originally posted by: Fenixgoon
Originally posted by: Mwilding
Originally posted by: Dragoon42
Link to Ownage"I'm going to work on my batting," he told his dad. "Then maybe someday I'll be the one they walk."
The little runt learned a valuable life lesson that day, and by the attitude he has in that quote, he learned it well. The problem with the world today is that kids are coddled in this naive blanket of "everyone is special" mediocrity.

Harsh words aside, this was a league founded upon the tenets of "everyone is special" mediocrity, and the game should have been played out that way.

in the end, im with dragoon42... kids today dont know how to deal with failure, stress, and demanding situations as well as previous generations iMO. we expect everything to be taken care of for us, the playing field made level for us, etc.

and i bet the coach would have walked the star hitter regardless of who was next. does he want to risk letting that kid score? hell no. if he's the best, whoever's next is worse, and therefore won't have as great a shot at beating them.


I guarantee you that 50 years ago, they would've not walked the kid. Please don't give me any of this BS about hardships and such, it's freaking PONY LEAGUE .
:disgust:

Are you seriously telling me that you would throw away a whole season just to satisfy ONE kid while you have FIFTEEN kids that are YOUR responsibility that finds out it's no fun to lose, especially when they lost INTENTIONALLY.. ?

No, I would've pitched to the kid up and let the game take its course. How is that intentionally losing? Like I said, if you "jocks" want strategy, why don't they allow stealing for example in many leagues like this at this age? C'mon it's a fair strategy..

EDIT: To make it even clearer, let's say the good hitter stroked a single. Then by all means pitch to the sick kid as you would normally since he is in the game, but to specifically go after the sick kid teaches no sportsmanship which should be the primary goal of a PONY LEAGUE .
 

PinmasterJay

Senior member
Jun 12, 2005
649
0
76
Originally posted by: rsd
Originally posted by: Eugechi
Originally posted by: rsd
Originally posted by: Fenixgoon
Originally posted by: Mwilding
Originally posted by: Dragoon42
Link to Ownage"I'm going to work on my batting," he told his dad. "Then maybe someday I'll be the one they walk."
The little runt learned a valuable life lesson that day, and by the attitude he has in that quote, he learned it well. The problem with the world today is that kids are coddled in this naive blanket of "everyone is special" mediocrity.

Harsh words aside, this was a league founded upon the tenets of "everyone is special" mediocrity, and the game should have been played out that way.

in the end, im with dragoon42... kids today dont know how to deal with failure, stress, and demanding situations as well as previous generations iMO. we expect everything to be taken care of for us, the playing field made level for us, etc.

and i bet the coach would have walked the star hitter regardless of who was next. does he want to risk letting that kid score? hell no. if he's the best, whoever's next is worse, and therefore won't have as great a shot at beating them.


I guarantee you that 50 years ago, they would've not walked the kid. Please don't give me any of this BS about hardships and such, it's freaking PONY LEAGUE .
:disgust:

Are you seriously telling me that you would throw away a whole season just to satisfy ONE kid while you have FIFTEEN kids that are YOUR responsibility that finds out it's no fun to lose, especially when they lost INTENTIONALLY.. ?

No, I would've pitched to the kid up and let the game take its course. How is that intentionally losing? Like I said, if you "jocks" want strategy, why don't they allow stealing for example in many leagues like this at this age? C'mon it's a fair strategy..
No it isn't, the reason they don't allow stealing is because at that age people can run faster (and its easier) than to have not only the pitcher throw a perfect pitch to home, but the catcher has to make the catch, throw, and an infielder has to make the play as well.

At that age kids could just steal all the way around the bases if that was allowed and thats not even baseball anymore
 

Pikachu

Golden Member
Oct 10, 1999
1,178
0
0
I tuned out 35 years ago...
  • Pete Rose ran over catcher Ray Fosse to score the winning run in the 12th inning of the 1970 All-Star game.
Yep, and he went on to be a stellar example of what sports is all about. :roll:
 

Fenixgoon

Lifer
Jun 30, 2003
32,967
12,314
136
Originally posted by: rsd
Originally posted by: Eugechi
Originally posted by: rsd
Originally posted by: Fenixgoon
Originally posted by: Mwilding
Originally posted by: Dragoon42
Link to Ownage"I'm going to work on my batting," he told his dad. "Then maybe someday I'll be the one they walk."
The little runt learned a valuable life lesson that day, and by the attitude he has in that quote, he learned it well. The problem with the world today is that kids are coddled in this naive blanket of "everyone is special" mediocrity.

Harsh words aside, this was a league founded upon the tenets of "everyone is special" mediocrity, and the game should have been played out that way.

in the end, im with dragoon42... kids today dont know how to deal with failure, stress, and demanding situations as well as previous generations iMO. we expect everything to be taken care of for us, the playing field made level for us, etc.

and i bet the coach would have walked the star hitter regardless of who was next. does he want to risk letting that kid score? hell no. if he's the best, whoever's next is worse, and therefore won't have as great a shot at beating them.


I guarantee you that 50 years ago, they would've not walked the kid. Please don't give me any of this BS about hardships and such, it's freaking PONY LEAGUE .
:disgust:

Are you seriously telling me that you would throw away a whole season just to satisfy ONE kid while you have FIFTEEN kids that are YOUR responsibility that finds out it's no fun to lose, especially when they lost INTENTIONALLY.. ?

No, I would've pitched to the kid up and let the game take its course. How is that intentionally losing? Like I said, if you "jocks" want strategy, why don't they allow stealing for example in many leagues like this at this age? C'mon it's a fair strategy..

EDIT: To make it even clearer, let's say the good hitter stroked a single. Then by all means pitch to the sick kid as you would normally since he is in the game, but to specifically go after the sick kid teaches no sportsmanship which should be the primary goal of a PONY LEAGUE .

im pretty sure stealing was legal when i played baseball at ~9years old
 

rsd

Platinum Member
Dec 30, 2003
2,293
0
76
Originally posted by: PinmasterJay
No it isn't, the reason they don't allow stealing is because at that age people can run faster (and its easier) than to have not only the pitcher throw a perfect pitch to home, but the catcher has to make the catch, throw, and an infielder has to make the play as well.

At that age kids could just steal all the way around the bases if that was allowed and thats not even baseball anymore

So what? That's what the major leaguers do, shouldn't we emulate them at all costs according to the "athletes" in this thread? I bet there are some kids at that age that have great arms that could throw the runners out. Why are you not picking on the kids with weaker arms?
 

BlancoNino

Diamond Member
Oct 31, 2005
5,695
0
0
Originally posted by: Pikachu
I tuned out 35 years ago...
  • Pete Rose ran over catcher Ray Fosse to score the winning run in the 12th inning of the 1970 All-Star game.
Yep, and he went on to be a stellar example of what sports is all about. :roll:

Wow, he gambled. Big deal. He's a nice guy and one hell of a player.
 

PinmasterJay

Senior member
Jun 12, 2005
649
0
76
Originally posted by: rsd
Originally posted by: PinmasterJay
No it isn't, the reason they don't allow stealing is because at that age people can run faster (and its easier) than to have not only the pitcher throw a perfect pitch to home, but the catcher has to make the catch, throw, and an infielder has to make the play as well.

At that age kids could just steal all the way around the bases if that was allowed and thats not even baseball anymore

So what? That's what the major leaguers do, shouldn't we emulate them at all costs according to the "athletes" in this thread? I bet there are some kids at that age that have great arms that could throw the runners out. Why are you not picking on the kids with weaker arms?

You didn't get what I posted. At the major league level, base stealing and the ability to throw one out while attempting to steal is a balanced play, both sides have an equal opportunity at success. Have you ever watched 9-10 year olds throw the baseball around the field? The 4 run rule would happen every inning from base stealing alone
 

Dragoon42

Platinum Member
Oct 2, 2000
2,078
0
0
Originally posted by: rsd
Originally posted by: Fenixgoon
Originally posted by: Mwilding
Originally posted by: Dragoon42
Link to Ownage"I'm going to work on my batting," he told his dad. "Then maybe someday I'll be the one they walk."
The little runt learned a valuable life lesson that day, and by the attitude he has in that quote, he learned it well. The problem with the world today is that kids are coddled in this naive blanket of "everyone is special" mediocrity.

Harsh words aside, this was a league founded upon the tenets of "everyone is special" mediocrity, and the game should have been played out that way.

in the end, im with dragoon42... kids today dont know how to deal with failure, stress, and demanding situations as well as previous generations iMO. we expect everything to be taken care of for us, the playing field made level for us, etc.

and i bet the coach would have walked the star hitter regardless of who was next. does he want to risk letting that kid score? hell no. if he's the best, whoever's next is worse, and therefore won't have as great a shot at beating them.


I guarantee you that 50 years ago, they would've not walked the kid. Please don't give me any of this BS about hardships and such, it's freaking PONY LEAGUE .
:disgust:



uhm 50 years ago a kid with cancer wouldn't be playing little league. Your cancer boy wouldn't even be playing. Seriously here's a box of tissue
 

Scarpozzi

Lifer
Jun 13, 2000
26,391
1,780
126
How's the kid gonna learn anything if he doesn't step up to the plate and try. That should just give him reason to work out his arms and become a better player/person. Feeling sorry for himself and living behind his mom's skirt is not the way to be, no matter what battles he's faced with Cancer. He needs to stand up for himself and learn the hard lessons of life...in many ways, he already has.

 

rsd

Platinum Member
Dec 30, 2003
2,293
0
76
Originally posted by: PinmasterJay
Originally posted by: rsd
Originally posted by: PinmasterJay
No it isn't, the reason they don't allow stealing is because at that age people can run faster (and its easier) than to have not only the pitcher throw a perfect pitch to home, but the catcher has to make the catch, throw, and an infielder has to make the play as well.

At that age kids could just steal all the way around the bases if that was allowed and thats not even baseball anymore

So what? That's what the major leaguers do, shouldn't we emulate them at all costs according to the "athletes" in this thread? I bet there are some kids at that age that have great arms that could throw the runners out. Why are you not picking on the kids with weaker arms?

You didn't get what I posted. At the major league level, base stealing and the ability to throw one out while attempting to steal is a balanced play, both sides have an equal opportunity at success. Have you ever watched 9-10 year olds throw the baseball around the field? The 4 run rule would happen every inning from base stealing alone


No I get it, but why are you changing the rules and strategy of the game just because some kids aren't capable of throwing them out, while some are? (I truly hope you are getting it)
 

BlancoNino

Diamond Member
Oct 31, 2005
5,695
0
0
Originally posted by: Scarpozzi
How's the kid gonna learn anything if he doesn't step up to the plate and try. That should just give him reason to work out his arms and become a better player/person. Feeling sorry for himself and living behind his mom's skirt is not the way to be, no matter what battles he's faced with Cancer. He needs to stand up for himself and learn the hard lessons of life...in many ways, he already has.

Exactly. If I had cancer...I wouldn't want to be known as "that guy with cancer".
 

Poulsonator

Golden Member
Aug 19, 2002
1,597
0
76
Originally posted by: BlancoNino
Originally posted by: Pikachu
I tuned out 35 years ago...
  • Pete Rose ran over catcher Ray Fosse to score the winning run in the 12th inning of the 1970 All-Star game.
Yep, and he went on to be a stellar example of what sports is all about. :roll:

Wow, he gambled. Big deal. He's a nice guy and one hell of a player.

Pete Rose is FAR from being a nice guy. One of the biggest pricks I've ever met, and from what I've heard, he's that way all of the time.

However, he was indeed one hell of a player...
 

Pikachu

Golden Member
Oct 10, 1999
1,178
0
0
Originally posted by: BlancoNino

Wow, he gambled. Big deal. He's a nice guy and one hell of a player.
He practically crippled a guy who was supposedly his friend, and for what? :roll:

Fvck that, fvck him, fvck sports. Truly pathetic...
 

moshquerade

No Lifer
Nov 1, 2001
61,504
12
56
By the way, the next morning, Romney woke up and decided to do something about what happened to him.

"I'm going to work on my batting," he told his dad. "Then maybe someday I'll be the one they walk."

the kid will be over this long before his parents and the community are.
sometimes adults should learn from kids and just let things go.
 

mugs

Lifer
Apr 29, 2003
48,920
46
91
Originally posted by: rsd
Originally posted by: PinmasterJay
No it isn't, the reason they don't allow stealing is because at that age people can run faster (and its easier) than to have not only the pitcher throw a perfect pitch to home, but the catcher has to make the catch, throw, and an infielder has to make the play as well.

At that age kids could just steal all the way around the bases if that was allowed and thats not even baseball anymore

So what? That's what the major leaguers do, shouldn't we emulate them at all costs according to the "athletes" in this thread? I bet there are some kids at that age that have great arms that could throw the runners out. Why are you not picking on the kids with weaker arms?

Please stop making a fool of yourself.
 

DBL

Platinum Member
Mar 23, 2001
2,637
0
0
Originally posted by: Fern
Originally posted by: PoPPeR
Originally posted by: DBL
I'd have walked the batter. It's your job as coach to put your team in the best position to win.

If the kid is so sick, why have him play in the first place? If he is just a bad player, who also happens to have cancer, then those angry are using his disease as an excuse.
i very highly doubt that very many people agree that a little league's coach primary job is to make sure his team wins.

I feel strongly that a coach at that level has many other more important responsibilities than just making sure his team wins, especially by any means such as walking a good batter.

First, the coach should make sure the kids enjoy the game, at their age thats the most important thing. It encourages them to continue with sports.

They should also help the kids learn good skills, learn teamwork and maybe even some responsibility (although since they can't drive at that age, it may be the parents fault if they miss practice).

I think that "walk" possibly taught the wrong things at that age. I don't believe that coach should be allowed to caoch at this level anymore.

Fern


Why do those things exclude winning? In fact, having played little league for many years, I'd have to admit that among other things, winning made the game enjoyable. How can you fault the coach for trying to put his team in the best position to win?
 

getbush

Golden Member
Jan 19, 2001
1,771
0
0
OK, I didn't read the whole thread, but - that is why you protect your best batter by putting someone decent behind him in the lineup. don't_put_your_worst_behind_your_best. That makes no sense to do and it was an error on the part of the manager.


edit: ok i see now a lot of people pointed it out too. tee hee
 
Jun 27, 2005
19,216
1
61
Originally posted by: moshquerade
By the way, the next morning, Romney woke up and decided to do something about what happened to him.

"I'm going to work on my batting," he told his dad. "Then maybe someday I'll be the one they walk."

the kid will be over this long before his parents and the community are.
sometimes adults should learn from kids and just let things go.

Actually his parents are as cool with the whole thing as he is. It's the OTHER parents who are having a hissy right now.
 

moshquerade

No Lifer
Nov 1, 2001
61,504
12
56
Originally posted by: DBL
Originally posted by: Fern
Originally posted by: PoPPeR
Originally posted by: DBL
I'd have walked the batter. It's your job as coach to put your team in the best position to win.

If the kid is so sick, why have him play in the first place? If he is just a bad player, who also happens to have cancer, then those angry are using his disease as an excuse.
i very highly doubt that very many people agree that a little league's coach primary job is to make sure his team wins.

I feel strongly that a coach at that level has many other more important responsibilities than just making sure his team wins, especially by any means such as walking a good batter.

First, the coach should make sure the kids enjoy the game, at their age thats the most important thing. It encourages them to continue with sports.

They should also help the kids learn good skills, learn teamwork and maybe even some responsibility (although since they can't drive at that age, it may be the parents fault if they miss practice).

I think that "walk" possibly taught the wrong things at that age. I don't believe that coach should be allowed to caoch at this level anymore.

Fern


Why do those things exclude winning? In fact, having played little league for many years, I'd have to admit that among other things, winning made the game enjoyable. How can you fault the coach for trying to put his team in the best position to win?

too many people (parents) are caught up in the "EVERYONE'S A WINNER" attitude. one team is going to win and one is going to lose. prepare for it to happen and deal with it.

little league prepares kids for playing organized sports in school, and for life. in life sometimes you are going to catch a break or get the job. sometimes you won't.
sheltering your kids from disappointment is only going to make it hard for them in the real world when mommy and daddy can't go to bat for them anymore.

little league is life. the coach did the right thing. he taught them a life's lesson. no one is going to coddle this child if he were an adult and thought he could play major league ball and yet he isn't capable. those are the breaks.

 

rsd

Platinum Member
Dec 30, 2003
2,293
0
76
Originally posted by: mugs
Originally posted by: rsd
Originally posted by: PinmasterJay
No it isn't, the reason they don't allow stealing is because at that age people can run faster (and its easier) than to have not only the pitcher throw a perfect pitch to home, but the catcher has to make the catch, throw, and an infielder has to make the play as well.

At that age kids could just steal all the way around the bases if that was allowed and thats not even baseball anymore

So what? That's what the major leaguers do, shouldn't we emulate them at all costs according to the "athletes" in this thread? I bet there are some kids at that age that have great arms that could throw the runners out. Why are you not picking on the kids with weaker arms?

Please stop making a fool of yourself.

I don't see how pointing out how the rules are different because of players who may not be as capable as others (at that age) is "making a fool" out of myself. It clearly points a hole in the argument for those here who are saying that it is part of the game and "strategy".

The only thing I do agree on is that the story is way overblown if it made SI. Anyway, don't worry next time I coach I'll tell my kid to give yours some chin music
 
sale-70-410-exam    | Exam-200-125-pdf    | we-sale-70-410-exam    | hot-sale-70-410-exam    | Latest-exam-700-603-Dumps    | Dumps-98-363-exams-date    | Certs-200-125-date    | Dumps-300-075-exams-date    | hot-sale-book-C8010-726-book    | Hot-Sale-200-310-Exam    | Exam-Description-200-310-dumps?    | hot-sale-book-200-125-book    | Latest-Updated-300-209-Exam    | Dumps-210-260-exams-date    | Download-200-125-Exam-PDF    | Exam-Description-300-101-dumps    | Certs-300-101-date    | Hot-Sale-300-075-Exam    | Latest-exam-200-125-Dumps    | Exam-Description-200-125-dumps    | Latest-Updated-300-075-Exam    | hot-sale-book-210-260-book    | Dumps-200-901-exams-date    | Certs-200-901-date    | Latest-exam-1Z0-062-Dumps    | Hot-Sale-1Z0-062-Exam    | Certs-CSSLP-date    | 100%-Pass-70-383-Exams    | Latest-JN0-360-real-exam-questions    | 100%-Pass-4A0-100-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-300-135-exams-date    | Passed-200-105-Tech-Exams    | Latest-Updated-200-310-Exam    | Download-300-070-Exam-PDF    | Hot-Sale-JN0-360-Exam    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Exams    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-JN0-360-exams-date    | Exam-Description-1Z0-876-dumps    | Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps    | Dumps-HPE0-Y53-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-HPE0-Y53-Exam    | 100%-Pass-HPE0-Y53-Real-Exam-Questions    | Pass-4A0-100-Exam    | Latest-4A0-100-Questions    | Dumps-98-365-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-98-365-Exam    | 100%-Pass-VCS-254-Exams    | 2017-Latest-VCS-273-Exam    | Dumps-200-355-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-300-320-Exam    | Pass-300-101-Exam    | 100%-Pass-300-115-Exams    |
http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    | http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    |