LOL, Compaq cracks on Gateway :)

NFS4

No Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
72,636
47
91
http://athome.compaq.com/family_details.asp?ProductLineId=441&FamilyId=661


<< Compaq Presario 7000Z, which utilizes the AMD Athlon 1GHz Athlon microprocessor (Thunderbird), is not impacted in any way by some of the recent technical problems which have been reported in our competitive products. All Compaq Presario desktops are rigorously tested and do not exhibit any of the anomalies that have been reported in some competitive systems. >>

 

Scorpion

Senior member
Oct 10, 1999
748
0
0
Ooooooo!!
The mistakes only happened in LABS under very rare conditions. It really wasn't that big of a deal. I'm surprised they even bothered mentioning it.

But I'd prefer a Gateway over a Compaq ANY DAY! I've been a long time gateway fan. Way, way, way back... But I don't ever buy any of thier stuff anymore as I build my own now. But they are a good company for the average Joe.
 

Viper22

Golden Member
Oct 9, 1999
1,607
0
76
Ouch :| hehe oh well. It would be nice if Gateway would hurry up with the Tunderbirds in the 1GHZ to i could play with one at work

Resident Gateway Expert
 

NFS4

No Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
72,636
47
91
I'd buy a Gateway over a Compaq as well (but Dell is tops). It's just funny they way they slipped that in there
 

compuwiz1

Admin Emeritus Elite Member
Oct 9, 1999
27,112
930
126
NFS4, last I heard, Dell doesn't build Athlon systems. Is that still true?
 

RSI

Diamond Member
May 22, 2000
7,281
1
0
Well I don't like any of those companies.. I've seen many icky PB and Compaq systems, Gateway doesn't look great.. and I have a Dell (the 486 w/P83 overdrive), which works, but !#@$!@#$ look inside the motherboard, it's crap!...
 

Zorba

Lifer
Oct 22, 1999
15,613
11,254
136
lol, that is pretty good how they put that in there.

And I too would buy a Gateway over a compuke.
 

T2T III

Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
12,899
1
0
I have one thing to say to Compaq: People who live in glass houses should not throw stones!!!
 

prontospyder

Diamond Member
Oct 9, 1999
6,262
0
0
RSI:

The motherboard in your Dell might be proprietary, but look at the positive side of it, it's reliable and supported the Pentium overdrive chip.
 

dszd0g

Golden Member
Jun 14, 2000
1,226
0
0
Compaq was probably having a hard time selling their 1GHz system with everyone expecting it to have the same problems as the Gateway system.
 

PCAddict

Diamond Member
Nov 19, 1999
3,804
0
0
I am with Viper22. Ouch.

I wish I had a 1GHZ T-Bird to play with at work. Getting bored with the &quot;classic&quot; one.
 

TimeThrash

Banned
Jul 6, 2000
283
0
0
Hah, I bought a Compaq flat panel monitor, and it didn't come with a power supply. I called up the company, who took the time to route me around to a dozen different &quot;Out-of-warranty&quot; companies which could provide me with this specific power supply. NOBODY had it except Compaq who had 787 in stock, but they were &quot;reserved&quot; for warrantied customers (they wouldn't let me BUY one for $50). So I bought a Gateway FPD1500 LCD Monitor instead. =)

PS: MAC IS NOT SUCK. USE A MAC AND YOU'LL REALIZE THAT STUPID.
 

PCAddict

Diamond Member
Nov 19, 1999
3,804
0
0
PS: MAC IS NOT SUCK. USE A MAC AND YOU'LL REALIZE THAT STUPID.

You assume I've never used a Mac. Well, you have assumed wrong. FYI, I've used Macintosh systems quite extensively over the last 15 years both academically and professionally. In fact, my roomate's G3 is sitting only a few feet from my system as I type this. I am yet to be impressed. After those experiences, I confidently say: MAC IS SUCK!

If you had even the slightest clue about what goes on here, you'd know that the Mac reference in my signature primarily relates to Team AnandTech RC5's rivalry with the Mac group.

And, in case you forgot:

MAC IS SUCK!
 

TimeThrash

Banned
Jul 6, 2000
283
0
0
Wow, you're edumajacated. Good for your little rivalry. Macs still don't suck. And I've used them for 15 years too so that isn't so impressive. And if you think 98 or 2000 or even Linux can come close to being as stable as the Mac OS you haven't used one in awhile.
 

arthurb1

Golden Member
Oct 23, 1999
1,168
0
0
If *nix OS'es aren't sable the why is (Cr)Apple writing OSX based on a *nix kernel...or do mac users even know what a kernel is (hint: not corn)
 

jmcoreymv

Diamond Member
Oct 9, 1999
4,264
0
0
TimeThrash obviously has not used anything besides a mac. Maybe the pretty colors attracts him.
 

TimeThrash

Banned
Jul 6, 2000
283
0
0
I didn't say UNIX os's, I said Linux. There's a big difference in structure there guys.
I've never used anything but a Mac? What do you think I'm typing this message on? I have a 550 Athlon and last time I checked it doesn't run on Mac.
More stable than Linux? Yes, I believe it is. Have any of you guys ever installed Linux? Ever programmed it? I have. The stability of it is entirely dependent on the programmer (protected memory doesn't save you everytime) and not every Linux programmer is a good one, or at least good enough to make stable software.
Apple's OS event handler has interapplication communication that no other OS can touch, because build into the standard code (more of an SDK) necessary to write a Macintosh application, there is a structure that allows the OS to take complete control over any application at any given time; no more &quot;End Task&quot; garbage while the system waits for the application to fix itself.
As for Linux, do you really trust an OS you had f***** compile yourself when it came to you as raw code? I don't.
 

arthurb1

Golden Member
Oct 23, 1999
1,168
0
0
NFS4: They started it

Hoo boy...what do just about all DECENT web servers (inculding the one that we are having this little discussion on) run ? x86, thank you very much, and I'm betting NT/IIS (probably not) or Linux/Apache. Where do you think that Apple got its code from, you think they paid for Unix or used a free Linux kernel? As for developer support, I doubt if Apple has anything even close to MSDN, you get so much sample code and all of the OS'es for nearly $600...$200 if you are a college student. Everybody talks about the PC sucking for desktop publishing...ever used Quark on a mac and had Photoshop open at the same time...I would not call that stability. Even browsing the net or checking e-mail on a Mac is a crash fest, we had 3 of them at this place where I used to work...and all I am going to say is that if you though that IE and Nutscrape crashed a lot on a PC...you haven't seen anything yet. and I dare you to try and browse with 4+ windows open at the same time...heh not gonna happen...and assigining a program how much memory it can have and watching it crash if you gave it the wrong amount is the best! The only thing remotely close on a PC is AGP Aperture size...
 

TimeThrash

Banned
Jul 6, 2000
283
0
0
Apple used a version of NeXT, since Steve Jobs is a BIG part of the company. It was used because of UNIX's protected memory and true pre-emptive multitasking attributes. Apple has a developer subscription system. You pay $100 each year (not just students) and get the latest version of MPW (most people use Codewarrior, or, back in my day, Symantec C++ with it's excellent libraries), their standard compiler, as well as CD's with updated versions of the Inside Macintosh series. I have used damn near every application on the Mac, ESPECIALLY Photoshop, and have never had a stability problem with two applications. Example: I ran Photoshop, Premiere and Poser all at once one time for a project and had NO problems whatsoever.
On the Mac it's reversed browser-wise. IE sucks and Netscape works well (gee, isn't that surprising since IE runs on it's company's native OS for most people, and Netscape, the main competition, has problems. Do you think it would be hard for Bill to write an extra line of code to disrupt packet transmission in Netscape? Or double the ping?) I've never had a browser problem on Mac unless the site was corrupt. NEVER.
Setting the RAM allocation is a very good thing when you know a program is wasting all your memory. On Macintosh at least, Word did much better with the bare minimum of memory and so did the system, because Word no longer had free reign to spawn as many garbage processes as it liked. It had to deal with what you gave it. If you weren't skilled enough to know the proper amount of RAM, well then, your own damn fault. Personally I think screwing with the BIOS is the tool of the devil...there's too much opportunity for mistakes (and don't try and say doing that enforces stability, even the best have downed machines through BIOS manipulation). On Macs this isn't a problem because everything always works all the time end of story. No plug and pray, just go go go.
 

PCAddict

Diamond Member
Nov 19, 1999
3,804
0
0
Nothing like a typical Macintosh zealot to brighten your day. And I thought my Mac-owning roomate's delusions were amusing.

You could be right. Macs are the best! Maybe they will someday rule the world. Be sure to wake me up when the happens.
 
sale-70-410-exam    | Exam-200-125-pdf    | we-sale-70-410-exam    | hot-sale-70-410-exam    | Latest-exam-700-603-Dumps    | Dumps-98-363-exams-date    | Certs-200-125-date    | Dumps-300-075-exams-date    | hot-sale-book-C8010-726-book    | Hot-Sale-200-310-Exam    | Exam-Description-200-310-dumps?    | hot-sale-book-200-125-book    | Latest-Updated-300-209-Exam    | Dumps-210-260-exams-date    | Download-200-125-Exam-PDF    | Exam-Description-300-101-dumps    | Certs-300-101-date    | Hot-Sale-300-075-Exam    | Latest-exam-200-125-Dumps    | Exam-Description-200-125-dumps    | Latest-Updated-300-075-Exam    | hot-sale-book-210-260-book    | Dumps-200-901-exams-date    | Certs-200-901-date    | Latest-exam-1Z0-062-Dumps    | Hot-Sale-1Z0-062-Exam    | Certs-CSSLP-date    | 100%-Pass-70-383-Exams    | Latest-JN0-360-real-exam-questions    | 100%-Pass-4A0-100-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-300-135-exams-date    | Passed-200-105-Tech-Exams    | Latest-Updated-200-310-Exam    | Download-300-070-Exam-PDF    | Hot-Sale-JN0-360-Exam    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Exams    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-JN0-360-exams-date    | Exam-Description-1Z0-876-dumps    | Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps    | Dumps-HPE0-Y53-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-HPE0-Y53-Exam    | 100%-Pass-HPE0-Y53-Real-Exam-Questions    | Pass-4A0-100-Exam    | Latest-4A0-100-Questions    | Dumps-98-365-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-98-365-Exam    | 100%-Pass-VCS-254-Exams    | 2017-Latest-VCS-273-Exam    | Dumps-200-355-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-300-320-Exam    | Pass-300-101-Exam    | 100%-Pass-300-115-Exams    |
http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    | http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    |