They sell stuff.Language models don't do anything useful. Come on.
standard PCs to 96. Bigger PCs to 192 using two LPCAMM3.
That is a bit strange. LPCAMM2 is available in both 64 bit and 128 bit versions IIRC.CAMM2 roadmap was talked about in the same event as LPDDR6. LPDDR6 will be delivered to consumers primarily as 192-bit CAMM2. Lower-cost systems don't get a smaller module, they get soldered packages (and possibly less of them).
It's a Tegra (bad) with an off the shelf CPU (bad) and rest not relevant.It's coming next year(2025), and will apparently have on-package LPDDR6!
Wake me up when they build a Medusa competitor.Nvidia PC SoC leak dropped:
It's coming next year(2025), and will apparently have on-package LPDDR6!
CAMM2 roadmap was talked about in the same event as LPDDR6. LPDDR6 will be delivered to consumers primarily as 192-bit CAMM2. Lower-cost systems don't get a smaller module, they get soldered packages (and possibly less of them).
LPCAMM2 for LPDDR5 has only 128-bit version.That is a bit strange. LPCAMM2 is available in both 64 bit and 128 bit versions IIRC.
They won't.and the majority of the PC market goes with soldered DRAM.
There ain't.If they have smaller LPCAMM modules today for LPDDR5X
Who cares, it's puny capacities either way unless they support (L)RDIMM.Especially if Apple reverses course on the Pro/Max/Ultra lines and use LPCAMM there
There is no way Apple is adopting LPCAMM.Wow I can't wait to hear the complaining, and the Apple blamefest, if this happens and the majority of the PC market goes with soldered DRAM.
Especially if Apple reverses course on the Pro/Max/Ultra lines and use LPCAMM there. I'm somewhat skeptical they will for laptops because making the whole bottom panel removable (let alone adding a door) to Macbook Pro would mess up the clean lines. But for Studio and Pro, sure.
EU regulations are proven to turn Timmy into a broken buck.There is no way Apple is adopting LPCAMM
More like 228 GB/s because 1/9 of transmitted bits on LPDDR6 is metadata and such https://images.hothardware.com/contentimages/newsitem/64629/content/lpddr6-notdatabits.png192-bit = 256 GB/s
I thought the 10667 Mbps figure doesn't include metadata?More like 228 GB/s because 1/9 of transmitted bits on LPDDR6 is metadata and such https://images.hothardware.com/contentimages/newsitem/64629/content/lpddr6-notdatabits.png
Basically subtract 11%
I wonder does this mean AMD's Sound Wave won't happen at all, or will be repurposed as the steam-deck's APU was?It's a Tegra (bad) with an off the shelf CPU (bad) and rest not relevant.
MSFT wants to push WoA with multiple vendors.I wonder does this mean AMD's Sound Wave won't happen at all, or will be repurposed as the steam-deck's APU was?
We know that:
So what purpose would it serve?
- Sound Wave was only designed for MS as an alternative to this nvidias chip
- This "leak" (straight from the horse's mouth) tells us beyond any reasonable doubt that MS will use nvidia
Unsurprisingly. But is the Nvidia chip merchant or just for MS?MSFT wants to push WoA with multiple vendors.
Lmao yeahWow I can't wait to hear the complaining, and the Apple blamefest, if this happens and the majority of the PC market goes with soldered DRAM.
Only issue for the Pro/Ultra/Ultra is the modules are huge, my understanding is currently doing a 512-bit bus with LPCAMM would be a mess in the laptop. But maybe with round LPCAMM for LPDDR6 this isn’t as much a problem.Especially if Apple reverses course on the Pro/Max/Ultra lines and use LPCAMM there. I'm somewhat skeptical they will for laptops because making the whole bottom panel removable (let alone adding a door) to Macbook Pro would mess up the clean lines. But for Studio and Pro, sure.
If they have smaller LPCAMM modules today for LPDDR5X, why would they limit it to 192 bits wide for LPDDR6?
And is LPCAMM2 upward compatible with LPDDR6? I assumed with extra control signals it would need to be revved, but I guess they must have had a few unassigned pins they could use for stuff like ALERT?
Why are guys entertaining the idea of Apple using LPCAMM? Surely, it's not happening.Only issue for the Pro/Ultra/Ultra is the modules are huge, my understanding is currently doing a 512-bit bus with LPCAMM would be a mess in the laptop. But maybe with round LPCAMM for LPDDR6 this isn’t as much a problem
If EU regulation comes to Apple doors - yes, it CAN happen, and if they will focus user upgradeability - it will happen.Why are guys entertaining the idea of Apple using LPCAMM? Surely, it's not happening.
But if LPCAMM3 only comes in 192 bit bus...If EU regulation comes to Apple doors - yes, it CAN happen, and if they will focus user upgradeability - it will happen.
While Apple has not stated this directly, there have been indications they could pull out of the EU market if the EU puts too much pressure on them.If EU regulation comes to Apple doors - yes, it CAN happen, and if they will focus user upgradeability - it will happen.