pcgeek11
Lifer
- Jun 12, 2005
- 22,102
- 4,888
- 136
It has always been quite deep. Like Marianas Trench deep.
even if they did say it, it would not have done any good, he listens to no one except those that say yes and grovel at his feet.No. At this point, they are all lap dogs.
It's mind boggling to think nobody within his earshot has the ability to say "Dude, that might have not been a good idea"
Why does the left keep adding words like "white" and "socialists" to the word Nationalist.
When you add sh!t to the word it changes the meaning.
I'm not saying that at all. The practice of stochastic terrorism has inherent plausible deniability which Trump would use to the utmost as he continues to preach hatred & violence. All dictators ride into power on chaos of their own creation.
Ok we get it you learned (or are trying to make it part of the common lexicon) "stochastic terrorism", you really don't need to constantly repeat it over and over. We already understood what it was without needing an official term for it, let alone one doesn't actually further the specific understanding of the situation it pertains to. If I'm not mistaken there's some nebulousness with regards to it being valid (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Stochastic) but that gets into semantics and other things that I don't give a shit about bringing into discussing the actual pertinent topic/issue.
I was pointing out that they were viewing you saying "there's more/worse on the way" as though you were dismissing this situation not entirely unlike the people trying to go "yeah but they weren't real bombs", which you weren't. I guess I assumed you were saying it'll take that worse situation for things to change but apparently not. I absolutely think Turmp would seize an opportunity to remove the "stocahstic" aspect myself (hence the "you're wrong") were he to actually get to the level you think he's targeting by that method (I think there's zero chance of that, he'll die from age before he can realize that through such means, and there's no payoff for his family as even Turmpers I don't think revere the son or daughter like him, and most other people would see that they've done even less than Turmp for their fame and fortune). Really it just boils down to, their, argument is that the situation is already here, you're saying its gonna get worse. We'll see.
That's not really true, as seen with the multitude of dictators that were born into it (North Korea being the best modern version, but there's plenty of others through history, like many monarchies and no not all of those situations came about through an originating "stochastic terrorism" situation). There's many roads to despots.
I guess GOP doesn't have a problem with domestic terrorism, as long as it supports them.The Trump administration is reportedly planning to end a grant program under the Department of Homeland Security that provides grants to organizations that fight domestic terrorism.
NBC News reports that recipients of the Countering Violent Extremism Grant program have been informed that previous grants, which were intended to be part of yearly funding for the organizations, were instead a "one-time" funding grant.
In addition, all references to future funding opportunities or announcements have been scrubbed from the DHS Office of Terrorism Prevention Partnerships's website, NBC reports.
He's our President, of course we cheer him on.Meanwhile people like PC and Taj cheer Trump on. He incites the base and more people die. Makes them happy I guess.
He's our President, of course we cheer him on.
That is just like your opinion or something.
lol what are you talking about? Is this what the right is complaining about?
See, the actual problem here is that when someone calls themselves "a nationalist" the literate adult rightly thinks of Mussolini, not David Duke.
That's the issue.
Interesting, so Obama wasn't your president?
Oops, your hypocrisy is showing.
https://thehill.com/policy/defense/...ra-program-to-fight-domestic-terrorism-report
I guess GOP doesn't have a problem with domestic terrorism, as long as it supports them.
Then the literate adult would be wrong.
"Knowing facts is wrong, because recorded history is wrong. Words no longer have meaning."
Fuck off, idiot. This isn't a matter of opinion.
I cheered him on also when he was doing things I approved.Interesting, so Obama wasn't your president?
Oops, your hypocrisy is showing.
He's our President, of course we cheer him on.
I cheered him on also when he was doing things I approved.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Credit_CARD_Act_of_2009
.”“Now that I am a sober man, I know that I a very sick man,” Sayoc reportedly said. “I wish more than anything that I could turn back time and take back what I did ... I feel the pain and suffering of these victims