Sure, he can be the online troll counterpart, as long as they don't push him as a Presidential candidate. He's barely liked even in his own state.
Sure, he can be the online troll counterpart, as long as they don't push him as a Presidential candidate. He's barely liked even in his own state.This is doing a fantastic job of raising Newsom's profile to that of the anti-Trump
Nah, but it is funny to watch the continued decline (disappearance?) of the Democratic party. Thanks for nothing.You've come out of the closet! REPUBLICAN!
Just so you are aware we know that regardless of who is chosen you will say they are terrible and doomed. It literally doesn’t matter.Sure, he can be the online troll counterpart, as long as they don't push him as a Presidential candidate. He's barely liked even in his own state.
Wrong. I've already mentioned the small list that might have a shot (IMO).Just so you are aware we know that regardless of who is chosen you will say they are terrible and doomed. It literally doesn’t matter.
Surprised that you of all people have given into the polyanna that there is ever any coming back from this.Another person perfectly demonstrating how stupid they've become over the last 10 years..
Unable to critically think or assess facts.
Willfully ignoring:
View attachment 125291
I guarantee that if any of those individuals are actually selected you will decide they are doomed. You only have one setting, after all.Wrong. I've already mentioned the small list that might have a shot (IMO).
Sure, he can be the online troll counterpart, as long as they don't push him as a Presidential candidate. He's barely liked even in his own state.
Threatening peaceful protestors with violence, not only makes them less likely to show up (as the guy says), it also increases the chances that the folk who _do_ show up will be disproportionately the non-peaceful ones. It's as likely to encourage those looking for a scrap as it is to dissuade the non-violent. Both effects, possibly constituting a 'win' for Trump.
Threatening peaceful protestors with violence, not only makes them less likely to show up (as the guy says), it also increases the chances that the folk who _do_ show up will be disproportionately the non-peaceful ones. It's as likely to encourage those looking for a scrap as it is to dissuade the non-violent. Both effects, possibly constituting a 'win' for Trump.
Practically speaking Trump is 78 and looks like a big pile of unhealthy shit. There is no MAGA heir apparent because the thing literally is him. Very few cults survive the death of the founder. He's not going to live forever.
Yea. Protest not allowed in Putins Russia. Get Rekt.
I'm pretty surenotorious mass murderer Sirius BlackGeorge Soros is at it again!
I'm not sure it works that way and come the 14th I think we'll see again that it does not.
I also think we need to distinguish between Trump largely getting to do what he wants and what constitutes a political "win" from implementing those policies. A lot of the stuff he likes doing people hate and it's showing up in the polling. Trump already produced one historic midterm loss for the GOP and certainly could do so again.
Hold your horse. It could still happen 1st half.OK so it is almost the second half of 2025, where is my prize ?
I'm not convinced we won't see a reverse 2022 in 2026. Trump's approval rating is stabilizing/improving and he is still above water on immigration. The recent poll about deploying military to LA only got 47% disapproval (34 approved, 19 unsure). Yes, more people disapproved but hardly the widespread condemnation you would think.
Ultimately will boil down to the economy, perhaps. And if he actually pulls back on tariffs and the economy returns to "normal," that might be more than enough for the GOP to hold steady or even make gains. In this timeline, anything is possible.
I saw the coverage. Don't recall seeing one protestor wearing a gasmask.Little does MAGA know that retired senior is out front taking the heat while junior is doing all the work.
This is a good point - the more people learn about what Trump is doing the less they like it.A lot of people nationally aren't really paying attention to the LA situation yet. If it expands to other cities they will. Also 34% approval of a policy is...not good.
Trump's polling on immigration goes kinda like this:
General immigration approval. 55%
Approval of calling out the NG to protect ICE. 38%
Approval of calling out the Marines to protect ICE. 34%
Deporting people without due process. 27%
Deporting people who have American Citizen kids. 25%
There is a decent gap between what people think/hoped Trump is doing and what is actually happening. A gap that is probably going to shrink as Miller gets to act out his wildest (very unpopular) fantasies. You can already sort of see this developing as people start to realize they aren't getting what they thought.
View attachment 125313
Trump promised the first line but because millions of criminal illegals don't actually exist and the ones that do are hard to find they are going after all the other categories, per Miller's demand of DHS. Deporting people married to a US citizen who have not committed any crimes is probably less popular than herpes but they are doing it anyway.
View attachment 125314
The for what is as pretexts to seize more power. I put this more on folks like miller than Trump.This is a good point - the more people learn about what Trump is doing the less they like it.
It still kind of amazes me how quickly Trump was able to fuck everything up. Think back to last summer: the economy was good, wages were rising, inflation was falling, crime was going down, and cities were peaceful. Now we have massive economic instability not just within the US but globally, mass arrests by masked secret police, protests everywhere, etc. Like... for what?
Sure, the 'for what' was more a question of what we as the US gain out of this. Trump is trying to accreate power to himself with all this though, agree.The for what is as pretexts to seize more power. I put this more on folks like miller than Trump.
Police in Philadelphia attacking peaceful protestors. Ultimately police are escalating hostility which will ultimately lead to violence.