OK, Here is a question that has been rattling around in my head for a while, either answer me here, or refer me to a Digital Video enthusiast forum somewhere, if you know of a good one...
1st generation MiniDV Cameras have CCD's capable of recording something on the order of 600,000-700,000 pixels, or approx. 0.6 MP
newer ones have 1.3 MP ccds.
Was MiniDV tape designed to scale upward with resolution, (my 600k camera dithers the remaining pixels, or leaves them unused)
Do the 1.3 MP cameras compress the video stream with Mpeg-2 or something?
or are the additional pixels used to produce better digital image stabilization... More extra pixels around the ones being used for the recording...
(As I understand it digital image stabilization uses an oversized CCD with extra pixels. When there is no motion only the pixels in the center of the CCD are redorded, but the recording area can be moved as the camera moves minimizing hand shake, and smothing pans.)
1st generation MiniDV Cameras have CCD's capable of recording something on the order of 600,000-700,000 pixels, or approx. 0.6 MP
newer ones have 1.3 MP ccds.
Was MiniDV tape designed to scale upward with resolution, (my 600k camera dithers the remaining pixels, or leaves them unused)
Do the 1.3 MP cameras compress the video stream with Mpeg-2 or something?
or are the additional pixels used to produce better digital image stabilization... More extra pixels around the ones being used for the recording...
(As I understand it digital image stabilization uses an oversized CCD with extra pixels. When there is no motion only the pixels in the center of the CCD are redorded, but the recording area can be moved as the camera moves minimizing hand shake, and smothing pans.)