It would be a slaughter, like it was in history, having shit russian tanks and unprepared US/UK tanks fight Tigers. Again, it is in the game in *HISTORICAL MODE*. If you want to play a crapton of 5s against a few 7's, play that mode. It is how it went down in history... can the horde of shit take on a few amazing tanks? Play it out and it gets boring fast. If the horde is coordinated, the few tanks go down like a cheap hooker. If the pubbies attack one at a time, it is a slaughter the other way.
If World of Battleships came out "historically" then the US would be the only navy to have decent AA, the Italian fleet would sit unused until sunk, and the Japanese fleet, while impressive on paper would have such shit fire control that it couldn't hit anything. That makes for AMAZING gameplay. Right?
History does not an interesting game make.
well i disagree, for example i played Close Combat operation market garden, a long time ago in multi-player, and even tho the germans had better stuff, you would get less points to buy from the pool, and battles were pretty even, no matter which side i played.
there are ways to make video games even, while doing so in a ww2 era set-up and respecting history.
I understand it wasn't 15 vs 15, but the thing in WoT is they match up anyone vs noobs or pros alike, which makes most pub games boring. when it's not an out right suicidal squad team on our side, it happens on the other side or both team camp hard because of TDS and arty...
Last edited: