Well reader's digest says that laughter is the best medicine.For me it's a dark laugh. It's the one I allow myself for the purposefully stupid.
Trump would be the one to back for the actual office since he would at least to their unbiased statistical reasoning be the absolute worst thing for us
Indeed! Does it matter if it's positive laughter? A fair amount of my laughter comes from this forum and it is at someone's expense and sooo dark.Well reader's digest says that laughter is the best medicine.
Should I be ashamed to admit that he made me laugh?
We'll laugh together then.Indeed! Does it matter if it's positive laughter? A fair amount of my laughter comes from this forum and it is at someone's expense and sooo dark.
I'm trying to feel ashamed but somehow I can't seem to muster up enough strength for it.Yes. Be ashamed. Be very, very, very, very ashamed.
And, did I mention that you should be ashamed?
How many tears do you think he's won? He's losing at life so losing seems to be his thing but maybe he's won a single tear.
I agree he's not a traitor but he sure as shit likes to play one on the interwebs.
I'm in! Though I must confess, I have to take the occasional break from the Trumpublicans. They ARE as dark as my laughter at them.We'll laugh together then.
They make ridicule so fun!The little fascista is simply not worth anything more than ridicule.
They make ridicule so fun!
Thanks for the reply, but the link doesn't work for me. I'll try searching for it.Yup thats the one
From politico...
"National security adviser H.R. McMaster echoed the point, telling the Munich Security Conference that the evidence of Moscow’s interference is “incontrovertible.”
“Whereas in the past it was difficult to attribute … now this is in the arena of law enforcement investigation, it’s going to be very apparent to everyone,” he said."
Names Names Names
Keeping national security in mind of course but I can't imagine all will be protected.
I especially agree with Maddow at @13:12 when she says " There's nothing in this indictment ,either way, when it comes to the question whether any Americans colluded with this Russian operation. This indictment doesn't make any allegations about that at all ................."Just watch the maddow piece and if there is a "fact" you dont agree with, bring it up here and we will discuss it like adults .. no name calling - or singing.
I especially agree with Maddow at @13:12 when she says " There's nothing in this indictment ,either way, when it comes to the question whether any Americans colluded with this Russian operation. This indictment doesn't make any allegations about that at all ................."
I have no problem agreeing with someone when they're being honest, accurate and not an asshole. It's a shame I agree with you so rarely, try harder.That's weird, isn't she trying to push an agenda?
I have no problem agreeing with someone when they're being honest, accurate and not an asshole. It's a shame I agree with you so rarely, try harder.
Totally agree. Watch the same story on ie. Fox (or Trumps tweets) and you'll see this fact spun as proof that there never was any collusion at all. That is a logical fallacy. Maybe there was, maybe there wasnt. All we know is that *this* evidence does not support it.I especially agree with Maddow at @13:12 when she says " There's nothing in this indictment ,either way, when it comes to the question whether any Americans colluded with this Russian operation. This indictment doesn't make any allegations about that at all ................."
Exactly and was nevcer meant to. As many times illustrated, the trumpets are so busy today defending yesterday they see not tomorrow.Totally agree. Watch the same story on ie. Fox (or Trumps tweets) and you'll see this fact spun as proof that there never was any collusion at all. That is a logical fallacy. Maybe there was, maybe there wasnt. All we know is that *this* evidence does not support it.
The same message you would use to destroy a country by dividing and subverting democracy would be the same message politics controlled by the 1% would use to divide the country to destroy democracy. The message in some way or another is always fear. People who hate themselves already can't take the additional shame they are easily manipulated. They hide behind notions of American exceptionalism, God and Country to bolster their egos rather than the analytical capacity that brings real self respect, a capacity to think for oneself to seek truth rather than succumb to moral cowardliness. We are no longer children who have to kowtow to being brow beaten to survive.Trumpsters do seem to be having trouble with that. Maybe that's because the message is the same message the GOP has been pounding into their heads for decades.
My parents are hard core Trumpettes and I'm struggling with them over many issues.I'm in! Though I must confess, I have to take the occasional break from the Trumpublicans. They ARE as dark as my laughter at them.
Agreed but I do love giving them the gears. It's therapeutic for how completely frustrated I am by the current climate. I believe in climate change both with what Trump, Russia and the GOP are doing and encouraging and ya know, climate change.Too many here (and in other places) treat them far too seriously. They're shits who should never be taken seriously.
That must be difficult. I'm sorry.My parents are hard core Trumpettes and I'm struggling with them over many issues.
Well, it hasn't been just our elections they've been mucking with; they've attacked every euro democracy for the most part.Of course there has always been espionage throughout time but these new grass root campaigns have never been as successful as we made them.What I find most hard to reconcile is not just vlad the impalers filmography but also the fact that it wasn't just australian officials that passed information to the FBI. About trump campaign staff having contact with russians but it was also intelligence from other allied countries. That sparked the investigation. It would seem reasonable to conclude that if these intelligence agencies were aware. Then the russians were under surveillance. Which would make them either known operatives of the SVR or they are so closely aligned with russian intelligence operations that it makes them worthy of surveillance.
Because those countries deem them to be a threat to their own national security. I am not talking about the steele dossier either. I am talking about intelligence sharing between allied countries. I guess those sanctions over the russians invasion of ukraine really pissed vlad the impaler off.