Awesome stuff guys.
Maybe you guys could swing your Teslas by when I'm on duty the next time at the gas station and after I'm done filling up your gas tank, I'll check your oil for free, but only if you promise not to tell the boss man.
How does someone as dense as you survive? Are you a responsible self supporting adult with a real job and a place to live?
Considering his deliberate attempts to incite discord he just might be a genuine bot.
The GRU pays him enough to get by.
Thats extremely likely more likely than he has a real job and a family he manages to support but I was also thinking things like mom, ssi, works at a gas station, etc.
Considering the shallowness of some of his posts I would also consider product quality tester/demonstrator for a local drug dealer.
Hey now I actually did that in my early twenties before the heroin could kill you so easy. You might be right he seems more like a meth kind of guy.
Obama was in a lose-lose situation solely because he based his decision on Clinton’s inevitability while also simultaneously boxed in by the fact that she was under FBI investigation. Take away the FBI investigation, and factor in Obama’s strong popularity ratings, and assertive intervention becomes the easy decision.
Awesome stuff guys.
Maybe you guys could swing your Teslas by when I'm on duty the next time at the gas station and after I'm done filling up your gas tank, I'll check your oil for free, but only if you promise not to tell the boss man.
You got me thinking-I don't think I've been to a gas station where they check the oil since the Oil Embargo (Nixon's era, for you youngsters).
Same offer hold true for my Prius? At a quarter million plus miles, it is starting to burn or leak some oil.
Really, service at a gas station? What's that. When I was a kid they used to give away china and silverware as well as check your oil, and clean your front windshield at a minimum.You got me thinking-I don't think I've been to a gas station where they check the oil since the Oil Embargo (Nixon's era, for you youngsters).
Same offer hold true for my Prius? At a quarter million plus miles, it is starting to burn or leak some oil.
Really, service at a gas station? What's that. When I was a kid they used to give away china and silverware as well as check your oil, and clean your front windshield at a minimum.
I ain't got time for all that full service stuff because that meth won't smoke itself.
I wasn’t looking to have a conversation with you or “the others” who have so much concern over my bullshit.Lol. No you are a victim, I and others didn't fall for the bullshit, the bullshit you continue to spew in this very post.
Without a bipartisan denouncement/acknowledgement of Russia meddling you know that the right would have been screaming bloody murder and conspiracy, to think otherwise is just plain stupid or partisan hackery on your part.
I don't think he'll mind if you use it.May I please use this quote in my signature?
The Weiner laptop is what boxed Obama in and gave him little time to react given the proximity to Election Day. You cannot deny that optics factored into his decision making, optics complicated further by Clinton.The investigation into Hillary's emails was declared over July 5, 2016. It was not a factor after that until Comey's ill fated letter to congress in late October. A variety of efforts were undertaken by the Obama admin-
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...-russian-interference/?utm_term=.592d7f682130
To little avail. Obama couldn't find a way to up the ante sufficiently to deter the Russians w/o GOP help & none was forthcoming.
The Russians involved see it all as a great victory in their efforts to undermine our govt & our democracy. I'm not one to doubt their judgement, either.
That’s what she said.I don't think he'll mind if you use it.
Looks like he dug up Liberals partying at Russian sponsored anti-Trump rallies.
Shonuff did.Mueller issues 32 new charges against Manafort., Gates.
The Weiner laptop is what boxed Obama in and gave him little time to react given the proximity to Election Day. You cannot deny that optics factored into his decision making, optics complicated further by Clinton.
Former Vice President Joe Biden also has complained that the White House wanted Republicans to join in a bipartisan statement announcing and condemning the interference campaign. In Biden's telling, however, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., wouldn't go along.
But that didn't stop then-Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., from alluding publicly to the Russian campaign in a letter to then-FBI Director James Comey. And Comey reportedly wanted to announce the active measures in an op-ed column, as Newsweek reported in March 2017. Two sources with knowledge about the matter told Newsweekthat Obama administration officials blocked the effort.
Updated | FBI Director James Comey attempted to go public as early as the summer of 2016 with information on Russia’s campaign to influence the U.S. presidential election, but Obama administration officials blocked him from doing so, two sources with knowledge of the matter tell Newsweek.
Well before the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (DNI) accused the Russian government of tampering with the U.S. election in an October 7 statement, Comey pitched the idea of writing an op-ed about the Russian campaign during a meeting in the White House Situation Room in June or July.
“He had a draft of it or an outline. He held up a piece of paper in a meeting and said, ‘I want to go forward. What do people think of this?’” says a source with knowledge of the meeting, which included Secretary of State John Kerry, Attorney General Loretta Lynch, Department of Homeland Security Secretary Jeh Johnson and National Security Adviser Susan Rice.
Keep Up With This Story And More By Subscribing Now
Read more: FBI director confirms probe into possible Trump-Russia ties
But many in the room didn’t like the idea, and White House officials thought the announcement should be a coordinated message backed by multiple agencies, the source says. “An op-ed doesn’t have the same stature. It comes from one person.”
The op-ed would not have mentioned whether the FBI was investigating Donald Trump’s campaign workers or others close to him for links to the Russians’ interference in the election, a second source with knowledge of the request tells Newsweek. Comey would likely have tried to publish the op-ed in The New York Times, and it would have included much of the same information as the bombshell declassified intelligence report released January 6, which said Russian President Vladimir Putin tried to influence the presidential election, the source says.
No it didn't, again with your continuous use of bullshit. Just stop it.
https://www.npr.org/2018/02/21/5876...a-stop-russia-s-election-interference-in-2016
http://www.newsweek.com/fbi-director-james-comey-russian-tampering-election-576417
Now kindly shut the fuck up with your bullshit theory.
Life for Manafort and decades for Rick .. unless they flip 100%.
Dont mess with Mueller, he shreds.
No it didn't, again with your continuous use of bullshit. Just stop it.
https://www.npr.org/2018/02/21/5876...a-stop-russia-s-election-interference-in-2016
http://www.newsweek.com/fbi-director-james-comey-russian-tampering-election-576417
Now kindly shut the fuck up with your bullshit theory.
LOL from the very NPR article you linked:
“So why didn't Obama's administration do more?
That isn't clear. Some former administration officials who have talked about it publicly have reproached themselves for not acting more aggressively. There also was a long-standing criticism of Obama that his foreign-policy making amounted to endless process with no outcomes— hours of meetings that yielded more meetings but no ultimate action.”
This statement is completely in line with what I wrote. I am not floating a theory. I am articulating a valid criticism.
LOL from the very NPR article you linked:
“So why didn't Obama's administration do more?
That isn't clear. Some former administration officials who have talked about it publicly have reproached themselves for not acting more aggressively. There also was a long-standing criticism of Obama that his foreign-policy making amounted to endless process with no outcomes— hours of meetings that yielded more meetings but no ultimate action.”
This statement is completely in line with what I wrote. I am not floating a theory. I am articulating a valid criticism.
That does not support the claim of "because Hillary".
LOL from the very NPR article you linked..
Sure it does.That does not support the claim of "because Hillary".
I know that you linked an article that supported my assertion, so I am quoting bullshit you providedNo you are still spouting endless bullshit. Do you not know the difference?