the thing is that roughly 30% of the population here honestly did not believe that was true. ....so this is more confirmation for them, but of course they will probably still cry deep state.
I'm not sure why we're doing a happy dance here. Russians were putting out propaganda on social media with the intent of swaying the election, I thought that was established already? Weren't we all waiting for the Trump connection?
Let it ring that the only thing President Trump has ever said or done to condemn or deter Russia in any way comes on 2/16/18 at 12:18PM and reads:
Russia started their anti-US campaign in 2014, long before I announced that I would run for President. The results of the election were not impacted. The Trump campaign did nothing wrong - no collusion!All he has ever said and done to help was say it wasn't his fault. Jesus effing Christ how can anyone thing this is OK?
How so? If that is the root of this, then I have misunderstood. I see no reason to believe she did or did not, but you are saying that is in and of itself spreading scandalous claims?
Didn't he sign a bill sanctioning them?
He had deadlines to actually implement the sanctions. He did nothing. Declined to do anything. Hasn’t publicly assured the American people they are doing anything to protect elections either.Didn't he sign a bill sanctioning them?
He had deadlines to actually implement the sanctions. He did nothing. Declined to do anything. Hasn’t publicly assured the American people they are doing anything to protect elections either.
Didn't he sign a bill sanctioning them?
Didn't he sign a bill sanctioning them?
Well... He signed a bill accepting responsibility for implementing sanctions, oversaw an administration which imposed big cuts to the State department including those responsible for implementing foreign sanctions, missed multiple implementation deadlines, and ultimately delivered correspondence to Congress that he never would. So I'm going to file that one under the category of actions taken by a hypocritical traitorous shithole. Fair?
You might be a serial killer. I have no proof that you are, but then again, I have never seen any proof that you aren't. I just thought I'd throw that into the thread, because of course, it's oh so important to discuss anything and everything in the universe which theoretically could be true.
Face it, you were throwing out an extraordinarily weak insinuation for which you acknowledge you have zero proof in order to play your usual both sides game. "Well, mayyybbbeee Hillary did it too."
Didn't he sign a bill sanctioning them?
How could it possibly be proven? Ask every voter if a Facebook meme changed their mind? Think for once in your life and don’t look to fox for your thoughts.
The question was asked if the indictment was proof she did not work with the Russians. I said no. That was because the indictment has nothing to do with that topic. There was no insinuation because I don't believe she did. I also don't believe she did not because there is nothing to indicate otherwise. That is separate from my comment in response that started this.
This indictment is just about Russians trying to influence the election. It does not mean Trump is innocent or guilty. It does not mean Hillary is innocent or guilty. It does not mean you ate lunch today. Thus, the answer to the question is no, we cannot say anything about Hillary because of this indictment other than she was a target of Russia.
It has because you and your ilk of imbeciles keep saying Trump colluded but have produced zero evidence outside of the dossier. We absolutely know that Clinton, the DNC, and people at the top levels of the DOJ knowingly tried to hide financial and working ties to the dossier. Which could be one of several possible attempts by the Russians to influence the election. We also know the DNC did influence the election on the Democrat side and still some questions about possible money laundering by Clinton once she took over the DNC fund raising. I still don't know how you can continue to question that. Please tell me what part(s) you still refute.
lol He's full of it.
Trump's recent tweet: "Russia started their anti-US campaign in 2014, long before I announced that I would run for President. The results of the election were not impacted. The Trump campaign did nothing wrong - no collusion!"
Yet Artem Kluyshin's (associated with a guy who runs the brothel that is thought to have blackmail on Donnie) wife tweeted this beginning 2014.
Zero evidence? You always seem to forget don jr met with the russians to get dirt on hillary. Your so big on conspiracy theories I wonder what you'd think if it was Chelsea meeting with the russians and hillary that got elected.
It seems if you're one of those "Trump is not my President ass fvcking holes you are doing exactly what your Russian masters wanted you to do. In fact everyone on one side or the other seems to done what they pushed for. At least I never protested against a sitting President and supported our political enemies.