ub4ty
Senior member
- Jun 21, 2017
- 749
- 898
- 96
Deciding where to move the eye next after a visual stimulus on its own takes 100-140ms - what do you expect to achieve by seeing an image 5ms earlier than someone else? In a fast-paced game things like aim and skill are much more important than if you are able to see your opponent a few milliseconds before he can see you. So, no you don't win if you can see your opponent 5ms earlier due to your monitor.
He is a perfect example of how effective marketing is. Scores of people are buying overpriced hardware w/o any knowledge, intelligence, or critical thinking about the human body and its limitations... They actually think they're going to beat someone with true skills and APM capability pushing 240 (THE PROS) because they have a GPU that costs 2-3x as much and a goofy $1000 gaming monitor. Anyone remember the 'Killer' NICs? LOL
It's like the scrub who can't get picked up at the neighborhood basketball court thinking because he has $500 Nikes on that he's Jordan.
I'm never amazed at how confidently people reiterate marketing lines in arguments and other such gimmicks. He literally thinks that 5ms is going to make the difference between him and a skilled player... He reasserts it multiple times as if we have a brain disfunction...
You can't make this up
...