Rectalfier
Golden Member
- Nov 21, 1999
- 1,589
- 0
- 0
I guess everyone has their own upgrade options. I will go with any company that offers top of the line performance for the best price. Intel did it for me with the CeleronA 300 which overlocked nicely to 464, and was on par with the yet unreleased P2 450. Amd did it for me with the Athlon500 that overclocked to 700mhz, when the fastest thing out there was 600mhz. AMD did it for me again when I bought a 1.2Ghz chips that over clocked it to 1.4ghz when the 1.3ghz was still coming out. I have enjoyed better than top of the line performance for less than $250 Canadian for me to ever go back. I will always regret paying 600 dollars canadian for a 233mhz, when I found out that the sub $250 166mmx chips were overclocking greater than 233mhz.
In short, I will never buy the fastest processor out. I'll stick to mid range CPU's that are likely to overclock to greater speeds than commercially available. Nothing beats that kind of bragging. I almost made a guy cry, because he paid over $1000 Canadian for a P2 400mhz, when I was running at 464mhz for less than a quarter of the price. O well, to each his own.
In short, I will never buy the fastest processor out. I'll stick to mid range CPU's that are likely to overclock to greater speeds than commercially available. Nothing beats that kind of bragging. I almost made a guy cry, because he paid over $1000 Canadian for a P2 400mhz, when I was running at 464mhz for less than a quarter of the price. O well, to each his own.