dzoner
Banned
- Feb 21, 2010
- 114
- 0
- 0
Not sure on unit quantity but that was an ATi part(as in BBA)- if nV were going to take the hit on costs and sell their board partners already finished boards then it could be seen as a viable use of resources as nV would write it down as a marketting expense. Board vendors aren't going to do it themselves, and if this were the case we would be certain to see every board from every vendor identical, which the talk of OC varriants would rule out.
It does seem a bit odd that they would have a number for end of life on the product already, no matter what the situation, for a product that has just started to ramp. Looking at it from a straight business perspective, if I'm only getting 5K chips out of the high end run every one of them is becoming a Tesla/Quadro- it's just smart business.
Nvidia is probably working with one or two board partners (EVGA for sure) to do a 'halo' 480, a card with monster cooling, super select handpicked GPUs, isn't concerned with the 300 watt limit, and can squeeze out the absolute best performance that can be had from the A3 silicon, whatever it takes to have a factory released single GPU card that can be touted as king of the hill. But can it best the Gigabyte 5870 SOC looking to release with a 1000 mhz o/c?
Why not an EOL already if they aren't going to buy any more A3 wafers. With the ridicule, upset and bad press the GTX 470/480 will garner, why continue them when they get more product to sell in Sept or Oct. It'll be time for 'Fermi II', the GTX5xx products.