Originally posted by: RadioHead84
hmmm all i can say is wow.
That is possibly the best batman ever..and a great movie overal. I put it high on the top list of movies i have ever seen. It was a lot darker then the other ones and i like how it just threw evertying out from the old ones and started a new. Some great lines, Great acting, great story, and no over dramatic special effects.
The only thing i didnt like about the movie..which i have to say..i still enjoyed were the fight scene cameras. You will knwo what i mean when you see it..the camera always seems like its way too close to the action and is constantly moving. You never get a full shot of whats going on. Now I know this makes sense in the way that batman is...you know..in the shadows and all. But still I would have liked to see a little more of the actual combat then just seeing two people wrestle most of the time.
STILL GREAT THO. and if you like batman at all there are tons of moments where you just want to say "Oh hell yes".
It got an applaus after it was over
Originally posted by: brigden
I feel a lot of the complaints are ungrounded.
This film is not a prequel. It does not have anything to do with any Batman film before it. The four films before it are unrelated.
The Joker did not kill Wayne's parents in the comic book. Burton dreamed up that idea. Joe Chill was responsible for Wayne's parents murder and it went down nearly exactly as it was descibed over sixty years ago.
Obviously, Batman is in the infancy of his career. Both the Batmobile and the Batcave will evolve as he grows. Having a ready-made Batmobile with Bat-wing fins a la Tim Burton would have been too unrealistic. I think the "Tumbler" was perfect.
The "close-up, blurry" fight scenes make sense. One, they're more intense, and two, watching Batman neatly take down a group of thugs while being treated to a full and steady shot of his costume takes some of the mystique away. I'm pretty sure the filmmakers tried filming the fight scenes neatly but realized that it looked akward.
The acting was perfect; Bale was without doubt the most convincing Wayne/Batman. The visuals were perfect too; there wasn't too much CG (thank God). The only gripe I have is that there wasn't a better musical score. I realize that the music can become a character in the film (like Elfman's '89 score) and the filmmakers probably wanted to avoid the epic, but a decent theme would have been nice.
Overall, this movie was for the fans. It isn't as accessible as, say, Spider-Man, but I'm glad they made a Batman film for the fans and not necessarily just for the masses.
I honestly think it was the best movie I've ever seen.
Originally posted by: PhaZe
No attrox, it's not as bad as bourne supremecy. that movie gave me a headache.
i think my dad threw up in the middle of it.
:>
Originally posted by: Insomniak
I can never take ex-WB actors/actresses seriously.
Originally posted by: VIAN
His past. Don't forget that in Batman, Batman also ran through the streets in gotham, just didn't destroy things. He also did it in Batman Returns. I just so happens that I've never read the comics. Keaton always had this look of ponder on his face, where he dwelled on the past. It gave you reaons why is the way he is. And even after all this time, he is still troubled by them.What mysteriousness did Batman have in the previous films? You mean as to his past? I guess if you never read any of the comics nor watched the cartoons, that might be true. Or did you mean his tendency to keep in the shadows, as opposed to an insane million-dollars-in-damage caught on TV car chase?
Originally posted by: NFS4
Just got back from seeing it with my dad.
**Note, Batman (1989) is my favorite movie of all time...PERIOD. End of discussion**
That being said, I thought this movie was decent but left me wanting mostly. It just didn't "click" with me the way the original did when I saw it at age 9. This one seemed sorta meh and the fast cutting fight scenes were enough to drive my batty. Bale had the whole cocky, I'm mad at the world attitude going on, but he just can't top Keaton.
And the baddies in this movie? Puhlease. They can't even come close to touching Jack in the original.
But by far, the WORST offense in the whole movie was when he first said "I'm Batman!" It was so horrible I wanted to puke my brains out.
That being said, I still like Batman and Batman Returns way better than this new flick
Originally posted by: brigden
Originally posted by: NFS4
Just got back from seeing it with my dad.
**Note, Batman (1989) is my favorite movie of all time...PERIOD. End of discussion**
That being said, I thought this movie was decent but left me wanting mostly. It just didn't "click" with me the way the original did when I saw it at age 9. This one seemed sorta meh and the fast cutting fight scenes were enough to drive my batty. Bale had the whole cocky, I'm mad at the world attitude going on, but he just can't top Keaton.
And the baddies in this movie? Puhlease. They can't even come close to touching Jack in the original.
But by far, the WORST offense in the whole movie was when he first said "I'm Batman!" It was so horrible I wanted to puke my brains out.
That being said, I still like Batman and Batman Returns way better than this new flick
You suck.
Originally posted by: brigden
Originally posted by: NFS4
Just got back from seeing it with my dad.
**Note, Batman (1989) is my favorite movie of all time...PERIOD. End of discussion**
That being said, I thought this movie was decent but left me wanting mostly. It just didn't "click" with me the way the original did when I saw it at age 9. This one seemed sorta meh and the fast cutting fight scenes were enough to drive my batty. Bale had the whole cocky, I'm mad at the world attitude going on, but he just can't top Keaton.
And the baddies in this movie? Puhlease. They can't even come close to touching Jack in the original.
But by far, the WORST offense in the whole movie was when he first said "I'm Batman!" It was so horrible I wanted to puke my brains out.
That being said, I still like Batman and Batman Returns way better than this new flick
You suck.
Originally posted by: The Boss
Originally posted by: brigden
Originally posted by: NFS4
Just got back from seeing it with my dad.
**Note, Batman (1989) is my favorite movie of all time...PERIOD. End of discussion**
That being said, I thought this movie was decent but left me wanting mostly. It just didn't "click" with me the way the original did when I saw it at age 9. This one seemed sorta meh and the fast cutting fight scenes were enough to drive my batty. Bale had the whole cocky, I'm mad at the world attitude going on, but he just can't top Keaton.
And the baddies in this movie? Puhlease. They can't even come close to touching Jack in the original.
But by far, the WORST offense in the whole movie was when he first said "I'm Batman!" It was so horrible I wanted to puke my brains out.
That being said, I still like Batman and Batman Returns way better than this new flick
You suck.
I concur. Anyone who prefers another Batman movie to Batman Begins must be a Batman movies fan, not a true Batman fan.
Originally posted by: The Boss
Originally posted by: brigden
Originally posted by: NFS4
Just got back from seeing it with my dad.
**Note, Batman (1989) is my favorite movie of all time...PERIOD. End of discussion**
That being said, I thought this movie was decent but left me wanting mostly. It just didn't "click" with me the way the original did when I saw it at age 9. This one seemed sorta meh and the fast cutting fight scenes were enough to drive my batty. Bale had the whole cocky, I'm mad at the world attitude going on, but he just can't top Keaton.
And the baddies in this movie? Puhlease. They can't even come close to touching Jack in the original.
But by far, the WORST offense in the whole movie was when he first said "I'm Batman!" It was so horrible I wanted to puke my brains out.
That being said, I still like Batman and Batman Returns way better than this new flick
You suck.
I concur. Anyone who prefers another Batman movie to Batman Begins must be a Batman movies fan, not a true Batman fan.
Originally posted by: IHateMyJob2004
Originally posted by: The Boss
Originally posted by: brigden
Originally posted by: NFS4
Just got back from seeing it with my dad.
**Note, Batman (1989) is my favorite movie of all time...PERIOD. End of discussion**
That being said, I thought this movie was decent but left me wanting mostly. It just didn't "click" with me the way the original did when I saw it at age 9. This one seemed sorta meh and the fast cutting fight scenes were enough to drive my batty. Bale had the whole cocky, I'm mad at the world attitude going on, but he just can't top Keaton.
And the baddies in this movie? Puhlease. They can't even come close to touching Jack in the original.
But by far, the WORST offense in the whole movie was when he first said "I'm Batman!" It was so horrible I wanted to puke my brains out.
That being said, I still like Batman and Batman Returns way better than this new flick
You suck.
I concur. Anyone who prefers another Batman movie to Batman Begins must be a Batman movies fan, not a true Batman fan.
This is a thread for Batman Begins .... A MOVIE
Yes there was, but that wasn't batman's fault. Batman didn't physically do that, he was just trying to escape and the cops' clumsiness led to much destruction.Wasn't there a scene in Batman Returns with a lot of cop cars getting destroyed as they tried to chase down the Batmobile?
Neither followed through with the comic, so Batman is better. Keaton says "I'm Batman" better. Because he was cooler. His symbol was even cooler. I wonder why Tim changed it.You suck.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I concur. Anyone who prefers another Batman movie to Batman Begins must be a Batman movies fan, not a true Batman fan.
***SPOILER CONTINUED******SPOILER***
One thing I don't understand is..
When all those people in Gotham were exposed to the scarecrow's concoction, how did they get cured? That little vial of vaccine that Morgan Freeman gave to Batman couldn't have been enough for the ENTIRE city.