blurredvision
Lifer
- Oct 19, 2000
- 17,860
- 4
- 81
This is huge if true, especially on the wireless front. I cannot understand what Sony is thinking. First up, one of my favorite things about the 360 is the built-in wireless. If the "low-end" PS3 package doesn't support wireless, I won't even think about it. The hard drive not being upgradeable isn't too huge of a deal, but is still a big stinker in the grand scheme of things.Originally posted by: jlmadyson
20GB PS3 to require wired controllers
Anybody heard anything else of this? This story smells of BS, but at this point, from all we have heard from Sony on the PS3 thus far, I wouldn't doubt it.Sony has today cleared up the confusion over the differences in specification between the two models of PlayStation 3 - and the cheaper version won't support wireless controllers.
As announced by the company on Monday, two versions of PS3 will be available at launch - one with a 60GB hard drive, and a less pricy model that features a 20GB hard drive. However, what the company didn't mention at the time is that the 20GB machine also lacks a number of key features that are included as standard in the more expensive model.
The 20GB console won't include an HDMI output, which means that it won't be able to deliver high definition pictures. But perhaps more disappointing is that wireless bluetooth controllers won't be supported; instead, gamers will have to make do with retro-style wired-up versions of the increasingly controversial PS3 pad.
The 60GB version of PlayStation 3 - shown here on the left - is identifiable by its chrome lettering
In addition, the lower-end model also lacks WiFi and the slot for Memory Stick Duo cards included in the full-spec PS3.
A Sony representative on the show floor at E3 also emphasized that gamers won't be able to upgrade the memory of the 20GB version; if that's the PS3 incarnation you opt for, you're permanently stuck with a 20GB memory limit.
Amazingly, Sony big boss man Phil Harrison, in a BBC interview earlier this week, insisted, "What we should be clear about is that the functionality is identical in both machines. There is no difference in what the machine does."
Unfortunately, the actual facts seem to suggest otherwise
Don't get me wrong, I'll still want a PS3, but it doesn't sound like I'll be buying one until the $599 version comes down to around $400, which will be atleast a couple of years, if not more. However, with Sony's track record on Playstation hardware, this isn't entirely a bad thing.