It's still amazing that Biden even tapped her for VP. Someone will always try to be an attack dog in a debate, but her low blows towards Biden were uncalled for.Make no mistake, I have zero love for Kamala. She came out in the first debate attacking other Democrats instead of focusing on policy. She's an authoritarian through and through. She was a bully as an AG. Republicans can't attack her on those vectors though because Republicans are worse on all three of those issues, so they have to cultivate bullshit personality defects. It's just sad that people still fall for it.
Isn't that the whole point of the VP though? Lay low and be a slightly worse person for the job so nobody gets any ideas?It's still amazing that Biden even tapped her for VP. Someone will always try to be an attack dog in a debate, but her low blows towards Biden were uncalled for.
It matters now because perception is reality. As bad as Biden's job approval rating is, Harris' net ratings are even worse. Usually the running mate doesn't matter much, but in this particular scenario, it's almost certainly a drag on the campaign.
Well, she's a woman, and she's black, so that's enough for 50% of the nation to hate her no matter what she does.It's still amazing that Biden even tapped her for VP. Someone will always try to be an attack dog in a debate, but her low blows towards Biden were uncalled for.
It matters now because perception is reality. As bad as Biden's job approval rating is, Harris' net ratings are even worse. Usually the running mate doesn't matter much, but in this particular scenario, it's almost certainly a drag on the campaign.
That's not the issue at hand. IIRC there were some early reports that Harris' team wasn't working "smoothly" with the WH; but otherwise it's not about her job performance as VP. It's a largely ceremonial job, as you've stated.Isn't that the whole point of the VP though? Lay low and be a slightly worse person for the job so nobody gets any ideas?
Realistically Harris' net ratings are so bad almost any other choice would be better for the campaign. That doesn't mean Biden should make a change because it's not that simple.But besides Harris, who would have been VP? Warren too polarizing politically to Biden. Whitmer would actually outshine Biden.
Wish Katie Porter had been free. I'll add just one more thing. She will not be the Dem nominee for pres. after Biden.But besides Harris, who would have been VP? Warren too polarizing politically to Biden. Whitmer would actually outshine Biden.
I’m seeing a Newsom and Mayor Pete matchupI'll add just one more thing. She will not be the Dem nominee for pres. after Biden.
Newsom...maybe...I don't think enough Americans are ready for an openly gay president to get Pete elected.I’m seeing a Newsom and Mayor Pete matchup
Well, she's a woman, and she's black, so that's enough for 50% of the nation to hate her no matter what she does.
Well, she's a woman, and she's black, so that's enough for 50% of the nation to hate her no matter what she does.
what did mike pence do as vice president?
But by your own logic if he did the 14th amendment would not bar him from the presidency.
Again, by your own logic the 14th amendment does not bar someone currently invading the US from becoming president. I know this sounds absurd but this is because your logic is absurd.
It is weird that you argue that people currently leading an armed invasion of the US are not barred by the 14th amendment from becoming president of the country they are invading.
You have to admit that’s weird, right?
Someone that is actually leading an armed invasion should be shot.
CO supremes disagree. Trump lead an insurrection by continually gas lighting his voters.
he led an insurrection by telling his subordinates to find him votes, and we’re still finding people at a state level that were either manipulating ballots or trying to in his favor.
Hundreds if not thousands of Trump supporters were involved, at a state a federal level.
You “laff” responded to my “I’m going to eat you”, but youre the sheep in that scenario. Blatantly lying to yourself and others to protect your identity (aka ego)
Trump is predictable, and you’re an ez mark.
Keep saying it maybe it will become true...Trump did lead an armed insurrection. Why do you deny plain truth?
If Biden and Kamala weren't Democrats, none of the conservatives here would have any problems with Biden's or Kamala's personality traits, because they wouldn't be constantly bombarded by propaganda telling them that they are senile or stupid.
Yes, because "idiots" have dual degrees in economics and political science, a law degree, a successful career as a county prosecutor, state attorney general, senator and vice president.
So... Racist or sexist or both?
SCOTUS in a unanimous ruling stated that States cannot make this determination.
Keep saying it maybe it will become true...
I don't agree with the above at all. But it isn't their "personality traits. Joe is senile and sliding into oblivion. Kamala just can't do anything, see the link I posted earlier.
Just because you went to school doesn't mean you aren't an idiot. Just because you blew you way into State AG Position doesn't mean that you are not an idiot either.
States can, and did make that determination. Keeping in mind that Republicans pushed that in CO.
States rights! Until we don’t like it!
Why? Is that a requirement for the 14th apply? Seems it isn’t.SCOTUS says otherwise...
Whatever... Just put him in jail already or shoot him....
Why? Is that a requirement for the 14th apply? Seems it isn’t.
Take it up with the ones that made the ruling...
"Because the Constitution makes Congress, rather than the States, responsible for enforcing Section 3 against federal officeholders and candidates, we reverse," the court decision concluded.
The ruling made clear that lawmakers after the Civil War intended the 14th Amendment to expand federal power, at the expense of the states, and that the Constitution "empowers Congress" to determine how to use the "severe" penalty of disqualification.
Doesn't answer my question. throwing someone in jail or shooting required for the 14th to apply?
It would seem that the 14th doesn't require a conviction, agree?
None of this matters to you anyway. You will keep beating that same old drum. Yawn
I've said my piece on it.