Originally posted by: Oyeve
I was watching the news this morning, and US oil companies made half a TRILLION dollars PROFIT! After all were paid, lawsuits paid (you know there are always lawsuits), R&D, overhead and all that shit, they made HALF a TRILLION clear PROFIT!!!!!
Originally posted by: LegendKiller
Originally posted by: Special K
What would happen if we restricted futures trading to those who actually intend to take physical delivery of the product? Obviously a hedge fund isn't going to ever take physical possesion of oil, yet they are still allowed to buy oil futures. How do they avoid not having to take physical possesion of their commodity when their futures contract comes to date? Do they just sell it off before then?
The hedging market isn't just for those who take physical delivery and it benefits all who take advantage. As I said, many companies who utilize fuel in their daily activities may want to hedge in the futures market, it is very common and very worthwhile for businesses.
They avoid taking physical possession by purchasing (or selling) an offsetting future, this "nets" the contracts out. They also avoid taking physical by taking the difference between the contract price and the spot "market" price on the expiration date.
It's not a problem of not taking physical delivery, it's a problem of over-investment and speculation. Some speculation is good because it gives liquidity to the market. However, the amount that we have is ridiculous.
Originally posted by: jpeyton
National average up to a new record-high of $4.04, even as oil prices retreat.
Somewhere, there is a boardroom full of oil executives dancing to Steve Miller.
:music::music: Go on take the money and run :music::music:
Originally posted by: Oyeve
I was watching the news this morning, and US oil companies made half a TRILLION dollars PROFIT! After all were paid, lawsuits paid (you know there are always lawsuits), R&D, overhead and all that shit, they made HALF a TRILLION clear PROFIT!!!!!
I think you crossed your wires somewhere. Soldiers murder puppies. Cops like murdering something their own size, like 92 year old women.Originally posted by: yuppiejr
Originally posted by: jpeyton
National average up to a new record-high of $4.04, even as oil prices retreat.
Somewhere, there is a boardroom full of oil executives dancing to Steve Miller.
:music::music: Go on take the money and run :music::music:
... christ, I thought for a second we were in P&N... Shouldn't you be accusing cops of murdering puppies or something?
Originally posted by: BudAshes
Originally posted by: Corporate Thug
Please elaborate.
If they had closed their legs and realized being a slut is only fun till you get an std, everyone would be driving a 40+ mpg car and wouldn't have moved so far from their place of work. Instead people kept buying behemoth vehicles and driving longer and longer commutes.
Originally posted by: Geekbabe
home heating oil is now listing at $4.59 per gallon here. I don't know how I'm going to make
it thru next winter here.
Originally posted by: Geekbabe
home heating oil is now listing at $4.59 per gallon here. I don't know how I'm going to make
it thru next winter here.
Originally posted by: ElFenix
Originally posted by: Geekbabe
home heating oil is now listing at $4.59 per gallon here. I don't know how I'm going to make
it thru next winter here.
air conditioning is more environmentally friendly than heating.
Originally posted by: Corporate Thug
first it was the refineries (or lack there of) excuse. Then that passed, now its the speculators.
Congress should ban US trading in oil commodities and see what the next excuse would be.
Originally posted by: Geekbabe
home heating oil is now listing at $4.59 per gallon here. I don't know how I'm going to make
it thru next winter here.
Originally posted by: Geekbabe
home heating oil is now listing at $4.59 per gallon here. I don't know how I'm going to make
it thru next winter here.
Originally posted by: Special K
Originally posted by: LegendKiller
Originally posted by: Special K
What would happen if we restricted futures trading to those who actually intend to take physical delivery of the product? Obviously a hedge fund isn't going to ever take physical possesion of oil, yet they are still allowed to buy oil futures. How do they avoid not having to take physical possesion of their commodity when their futures contract comes to date? Do they just sell it off before then?
The hedging market isn't just for those who take physical delivery and it benefits all who take advantage. As I said, many companies who utilize fuel in their daily activities may want to hedge in the futures market, it is very common and very worthwhile for businesses.
They avoid taking physical possession by purchasing (or selling) an offsetting future, this "nets" the contracts out. They also avoid taking physical by taking the difference between the contract price and the spot "market" price on the expiration date.
It's not a problem of not taking physical delivery, it's a problem of over-investment and speculation. Some speculation is good because it gives liquidity to the market. However, the amount that we have is ridiculous.
Lets suppose you are a business who consumes a lot of gas and believes that oil prices will rise in the future. Is there a difference between:
1. buying futures contracts today that will allow you to buy gas in the future at the agreed upon price, and then redeeming your futures contract for actual gas in the future
2. buying futures contracts today as a hedge against oil prices, then making a profit in the future by selling these futures contracts; this profit offsets the increased price you are now paying for gas
I'm just trying to better understand under what circumstances the contract would not be used to take physical delivery of the commodity.