OpenGL Fur Benchmark

[Pacfanweb]

2428 at the default setting

Q6600 at 2.7
8800GT OC

 

[Pacfanweb]

Originally posted by: JAG87
2325 at default settings. to bad theres no sli support

Why is my score higher than your? You have GTX's and I have a single GT.

Processor? I have a Q6600 at 2.7. Same amount of ram, different timings.

I still think yours should be a lot higher.

I might clock mine up some more and see what that does.

 

[JPB]

Here is mine / 1378

 

[postmortemIA]

[ Score: 460 o3Marks ] - Time=60 sec
Window Params: 1280x1024 - MSAA: 0X
GeForce 6800 Ultra
AMD Athlon(tm) 64 Processor 3200+

[ Score: 1529 o3Marks ] - Time=60 sec
Window Params: 1280x1024 - MSAA: 0X
GeForce 8800 GTS/PCI/SSE2
Intel(R) Core(TM)2 CPU 6700 @ 2.66GHz

 

[LittleNemoNES]

2862 oMarks on default settings.

I'm on C2D @ 3ghz, crossfire, 2gb ram @ 800mhz

 

[bryanW1995]

I don't thnk that's the link that you meant to post, gersson.

what cards are you running in crossfire to get that score? what is your rig?

 

[LittleNemoNES]

Originally posted by: bryanW1995
I don't thnk that's the link that you meant to post, gersson.

what cards are you running in crossfire to get that score? what is your rig?

Fixed the link

I'm using:

e6600 @ 3 Ghz w/ scythe infinity (used to do 3.5 Ghz back in the day)
P5WDH mobo
Corsair VS Ram @800mhz; 4-4-4-12
x1900xt @ 650/1500 w/Accelero X2
x1900cf @ 650/1500 w/Accelero X2
X-FI fatality
74GB raptor
300GB seagate 7200.10
2x BenQ 1655 DVDRW drives
Seasonic M12 700w
Antec P180 case
5 120mm Scythe fans (nexus fan controller)

Was an amazing computer a year ago. Now its pretty tame...
Looking to sell both cards and get me the new Rev of the 8800GTS that will be out mid Dec.

 

[bryanW1995]

Any c2d at 3 ghz is still very strong these days. that's a good cf setup, too, but you'll definitely see a huge jump going to a g92 gts. I wonder if they will EOL gtx/ultra with that card.

 

[LittleNemoNES]

I just put both my cards for sale on ebay

BTW, It seems I currently have the highest score >_>

what happened to all the 8800 Ultra SLI users...there's an opportunity to flaunt their e-peen; I'd figure they'd show right away XD

haha

 

[JimiP]

First off, I just want to say... that's a very cool benchmark. I ran the benchmark on the system specified in my signature.

Link: http://img99.imageshack.us/my.php?image=furbenchrc1.jpg

1796 o3Marks
Window Params: 1280x1024 - MSAA: 8X
FPS Min:24 FPS Max:40 FPS Avg:30

-----

Link: http://img248.imageshack.us/my...?image=furtest2zh3.jpg

2884 o3Marks
Window Params: 1280x1024 - MSAA: 0X
FPS Min:40 FPS Max:61 FPS Avg:48

-Edit: What is the "Stability Mode" for? I left it going for about 2400 seconds and then just stopped it. lol

 

[JBT]

Default - 2681
FPS Min:37 FPS Max:58 FPS Avg:45

1920x1200 w/ 2xAA - 1857
FPS Min:25 FPS Max:41 FPS Avg:31

 

[Pacfanweb]

Originally posted by: gersson
I just put both my cards for sale on ebay

BTW, It seems I currently have the highest score >_>

what happened to all the 8800 Ultra SLI users...there's an opportunity to flaunt their e-peen; I'd figure they'd show right away XD

haha

Someone earlier in the thread got 3200+

 

[Seraphiel]

Specs that matter, everything technically at stock speeds:

EVGA 680i SLI
QX6700 @ 2660 Mhz
2 * XFX 8800 Ultra XXX 685M @ 685 / 1692 / 2300 Mhz
4 * 1 GB 800 Mhz DDR2 CL5 T2
FW 169.04


640 * 480, 0 * AA:
20368 o3Marks
Min: 244 fps, Avg: 339 fps, Max: 407 fps
http://img107.imageshack.us/my.php?image=fur6et3.jpg

1024 * 768, 0 * AA:
9582 o3Marks
Min: 117 fps, Avg: 160 fps, Max: 204 fps
http://img340.imageshack.us/my.php?image=fur5tl8.jpg


Default - 1280 * 1024, 0 * AA:
5740 o3Marks
Min: 79 fps, Avg: 96 fps, Max 122 fps
http://img136.imageshack.us/my.php?image=furmu9.jpg


2560 * 1600, 4 * AA:
2416 o3Marks
Min: 34 fps, Avg: 40 fps, Max: 52 fps
http://img267.imageshack.us/my.php?image=fur2wp7.jpg

2560 * 1600, 16 * AA:
542 o3Marks
Min: 7 fps, Avg: 9 fps, Max: 12 fps
http://img256.imageshack.us/my.php?image=fur3go5.jpg

 

[Jeff7181]

1366 with a 7900GTX

 

[JimiP]

Originally posted by: Seraphiel
5740 o3Marks
Min: 79 fps, Avg: 96 fps, Max 122 fps

http://img136.imageshack.us/my.php?image=furmu9.jpg

Specs that matter, everything technically at stock speeds:

EVGA 680i SLI
QX6700 @ 2660 Mhz
2 * XFX 8800 Ultra XXX 685M @ 685 / 1692 / 2300 Mhz
4 * 1 GB 800 Mhz DDR2 CL5 T2
FW 169.04

You screenshot displays that you have 2GB's of RAM, not 4GB's.

 

[JBT]

Originally posted by: JimiP

Originally posted by: Seraphiel
5740 o3Marks
Min: 79 fps, Avg: 96 fps, Max 122 fps

http://img136.imageshack.us/my.php?image=furmu9.jpg

Specs that matter, everything technically at stock speeds:

EVGA 680i SLI
QX6700 @ 2660 Mhz
2 * XFX 8800 Ultra XXX 685M @ 685 / 1692 / 2300 Mhz
4 * 1 GB 800 Mhz DDR2 CL5 T2
FW 169.04

You screenshot displays that you have 2GB's of RAM, not 4GB's.

I have 4GB of RAM too but the app is displaying only 2GB. It also registers my Q6600 @ 2400 Mhz strange...

 

[omek]

Configuration highly fluxuates this intensive benchmark. 12x10 all.

16xAF/8xQ: AA/NegLOD: clamped/supersampling/texturefiltering: high Q
>1200
16xAF/8 AA/NegLOD: clamped/supersampling/texturefiltering: high Q
>1657
no AF/no AA/NegLOD: allow/no aa transparency/texturefiltering: high performance
>2742

Didn't keep track of the last two digits well.

E6600 stock
8800GT 715/1799/1011
1GB DDR2-5400
XP SP2

 

[Seraphiel]

Originally posted by: JimiP

Originally posted by: Seraphiel
5740 o3Marks
Min: 79 fps, Avg: 96 fps, Max 122 fps

http://img136.imageshack.us/my.php?image=furmu9.jpg

Specs that matter, everything technically at stock speeds:

EVGA 680i SLI
QX6700 @ 2660 Mhz
2 * XFX 8800 Ultra XXX 685M @ 685 / 1692 / 2300 Mhz
4 * 1 GB 800 Mhz DDR2 CL5 T2
FW 169.04

You screenshot displays that you have 2GB's of RAM, not 4GB's.

It is a common error. The two Ultras alone take 1536 MB, and there are more being lost to other hardware (XP 32bit limitation). Here is a screenshot where most of my hardware is detected correctly:

http://img118.imageshack.us/my.php?image=fur4tz8.jpg

I have 4GB of RAM too but the app is displaying only 2GB. It also registers my Q6600 @ 2400 Mhz strange...

The benchmark only detects default clocks based upon CPU ID, as far as I can tell.

 

[bryanW1995]

Originally posted by: JPB
Here is mine / 1378

what happened to your 3870?

 

[Denithor]

e6400 @ 2.8GHz
4x1GB HP DDR2 (benchmark sees 2047MB)
Radeon x1900gt (rev1) (stock)

1024x768 no AA: 1872
1280x1024 no AA: 978
1600x1200 no AA: 840
1600x1200 4xAA: 798
1600x1200 16xAA: 758

 

[bryanW1995]

running at native res of 14x9, stock e6750 and stock 3870 I got 3717. let's see:

1024x768 = 4732 min 1 max 109 avg 80
1280x1024 = 2962 min 42 max 64 avg 49
1440x900 = 3717 min 52, max 81 avg 62
1600x1200= 2641 min 1 max 62 avg 44
1680x1050= 2820 min 1 max 59 avg 49
1920x1200= 2710 min 1 max 62 avg 46
2560x1600 = 3828 min 1 max 119 avg 64

all settings with no AA.

not sure why every setting except default and native goes to 1 at the start.

the 14x9 makes sense b/c that's native res, the 2560x1600 looks, um, wrong. I ran it twice and got 3803 the 2nd time.

 

[Indyboy2]

Here Is Mine Everything at stock speeds and default settings
Score 2860
http://i24.photobucket.com/alb...yboy2/FurBenchmark.png

 

[fluxquantum]

894 at default settings. should get a boost once i get my 8800gt.

 

[Seraphiel]

LOL, when CrossFire works anywhere near as well as SLI in this benchmark, Nvidia 8800 series should loose any and all advantages. HD 2900 XT rapes 8800 Ultra at stock speeds and same settings/config.

Originally posted by: bryanW1995
running at native res of 14x9, stock e6750 and stock 3870 I got 3717. let's see:

1024x768 = 4732 min 1 max 109 avg 80
1280x1024 = 2962 min 42 max 64 avg 49
1440x900 = 3717 min 52, max 81 avg 62
1600x1200= 2641 min 1 max 62 avg 44
1680x1050= 2820 min 1 max 59 avg 49
1920x1200= 2710 min 1 max 62 avg 46
2560x1600 = 3828 min 1 max 119 avg 64

all settings with no AA.

not sure why every setting except default and native goes to 1 at the start.

the 14x9 makes sense b/c that's native res, the 2560x1600 looks, um, wrong. I ran it twice and got 3803 the 2nd time.

2560 * 1600 is bugged, no doubt about it. I would disregard any benchmark above native resolution, as the entire image is not rendered. It is quite easy to bug this benchmark, unfortunately. 2560 * 1600 * 0xAA only gets 50 o3Marks points less, than 2560 * 1600 * 4xAA <- that shouldn't be possible, considering the scaling of AA at other resolutions (and the jump from 0xAA to 16xAA).

 

[bryanW1995]

wow, didn't realize that my mem was still messed up. now that I've rma'd that stupid ballistix, the 3870 is now almost done running 3dmark06 at 860/2642 ...wonder how much higher it will go? will post fur here in a minute...