Openly gayness on TV.

[SSSnail]

What the hell is up with that? I mean, I understand their need to be identified as a different classification, but come on, you don't have to come at every turn with horns blaring and fanfare.

Just about EVERY show on TV now will have at least one gay guy , or a lesbian (have anybody figure out that thing on Leno's show, man or woman?) and that person will ALWAYS try to be as flamboyant as they can. Why? If you want to be treated equally, then act like everybody else, you're nothing special except for a few chemical and psychological imbalances. Get over it.

What do you guys think? And yes it bothers me. I couldn't care less about their sexual orientations, but don't flaunt it at my face every chance. Unless they're hot lesbians...

Discuss.

Yes, I know flame is coming, I got my flame retardant suit right here.

 

[Ruptga]

I agree

 

[scott916]

Meh, oppressed groups openly flaunt their oppressed ways when they're given more freedom.

 

[OILFIELDTRASH]

You got something you want to share OP?

 

[Kalmah]

Fabulous!

Edit: Pretend that is in all caps.. bah

 

[Juddog]

Who cares? People offended by this stuff need to grow up.

 

[SSSnail]

Who cares? People offended by this stuff need to grow up.

Not so much offended as annoyed.

 

[lxskllr]

I don't have TV, so I don't see anything different :^P

 

[M0oG0oGaiPan]

 

[syrillus]

you don't have to come at every turn with horns blaring and fanfare.

No I don't, but I can dream, can't I?

I couldn't care less about their sexual orientations

Clearly that's true...

Unless they're hot lesbians...

oh wait.

I don't really care if there's a stereotypical "gay man" in any sitcom or whatever, clearly it's an effort to be diverse or to hit that demographic. I don't really see the difference between gay guys on TV calling some guy "yummy" or making a gay joke, and a heterosexual guy making reference to how "hot" a woman is, or making a joke about intercourse with said hot woman.

I'll agree some characters are written a bit over the top, but I suppose that's from non-gay writers attempting to characterize something they don't understand, usually by portraying gay men as overtly sexual beings (which is the biggest stereotype of gay men, imo).

 

[Kalmah]

Putting on the music and lighting the candles now.

 

[amdhunter]

Deal with it. More than 3/4th's of the worlds population is gay. If you don't like it, read the bible or something to make you feel better.

 

[syrillus]

hot

vids?

 

[dbk]

You probably shouldn't tune into Glee then...

 

[KeithTalent]

It's the new affirmative action! Honestly though, who gives a crap? Don't watch if you have a problem with it.

KT

 

[Inspector Jihad]

the healthcare bill was passed today.

 

[TehMac]

I think homosexuals are gaylords.

 

[nanette1985]

With all the stupidity and lameness on TV you decide to pick on openly flaming gayness? Who cares? It's TV.

 

[Nik]

When you grow up and act like an adult, silly things like this won't bother you anymore

*pats OP on the head

 

[MagnusTheBrewer]

Deal with it. More than 3/4th's of the worlds population is gay. If you don't like it, read the bible or something to make you feel better.

I feel much better now that there's clear proof amdhunter inhabits a different world.

 

[shortylickens]

You know, I heard they are letting negroes on TV nowadays.

 

[Evadman]

Deal with it. More than 3/4th's of the worlds population is gay.

20.18 births/1,000 population per year is the current birth rate. If 3/4ths of the world is gay, that leaves 1/4 to give birth to 20.18 kids per year. since 1/2 of that 1/4 is male, that leaves 1/8th of the world population to give birth to 20.18 kids per year. So out of every 1000 people, 125 must be straight females, and of those 125, 20 have to be pregnant at any moment in time. 1 out of every 6 straight females need to be pregnant right now. In other words, all straight females must give birth every 6.25 years from when they are born until when they die. That means every straight family must have 12 kids while they are alive.

That also means that being ay would be the norm, not straight. Every 'make gay marriage legal' bill in congress or other state house would pass with 3/4ths of the vote since 3/4ths of the people voting would be gay, and 3/4ths of their constituents would be gay. Hell, that is veto-proof so the prez couldn't veto it, even though the prez would have a 3 in 4 chance of being gay.

What the hell are you on?

 

[MagnusTheBrewer]

You know, I heard they are letting negroes on TV nowadays.

Worse, they occasionally let intelligent people on but, nobody listens.

 

[amdhunter]

20.18 births/1,000 population per year is the current birth rate. If 3/4ths of the world is gay, that leaves 1/4 to give birth to 20.18 kids per year. since 1/2 of that 1/4 is male, that leaves 1/8th of the world population to give birth to 20.18 kids per year. So out of every 1000 people, 125 must be straight females, and of those 125, 20 have to be pregnant at any moment in time. 1 out of every 6 straight females need to be pregnant right now. In other words, all straight females must give birth every 6.25 years from when they are born until when they die. That means every straight family must have 12 kids while they are alive.

What the hell are you on?

I used ATOT as my point of reference. D:

 

[shortylickens]

I used ATOT as my point of reference. D:

3/4 of ananadtech isnt gay!
We might not be able to get layed but we arent gay.