Kaido
Elite Member & Kitchen Overlord
- Feb 14, 2004
- 50,431
- 6,572
- 136
I was recently interviewed for a master's thesis someone is writing about the music scene I'm part of, so that was interesting.
Yeet Skrt?
I was recently interviewed for a master's thesis someone is writing about the music scene I'm part of, so that was interesting.
nah fam we's bout dat folk punk drip fr fr no cap, BUSSIN!Yeet Skrt?
nah fam we's bout dat folk punk drip fr fr no cap, BUSSIN!
Been thinking about spaceship design. I think a Borg cube would be the pinnacle of efficiency. If a ship were built in space, is there any reason you wouldn't want to make it a cube?
A cube will require a lot of internal bracing. A cylinder would be the strongest design.Been thinking about spaceship design. I think a Borg cube would be the pinnacle of efficiency. If a ship were built in space, is there any reason you wouldn't want to make it a cube?
If it's not pressurized, it could be a bunch of parts hooked to a cable. Pressure and shielding are what a hull does.If it's pressurized, surely a sphere would be better? Or am I thinking of underwater vessels (as discussed repeatedly post-Oceangate)? Wouldn't a similar sort of logic still apply for a spaceship? If it's not pressurised, not sure why it has to be a single simple shaped object at all. Could be lots of bits loosely connected, maybe?
Hard to say without getting into the specifics of how the transwarp drive works, or the most efficient projections for shields. No idea if shape has any bearing on either of these, but it could?If it's pressurized, surely a sphere would be better? Or am I thinking of underwater vessels (as discussed repeatedly post-Oceangate)? Wouldn't a similar sort of logic still apply for a spaceship? If it's not pressurised, not sure why it has to be a single simple shaped object at all. Could be lots of bits loosely connected, maybe?