<< I bet that even if not making your cc payments on time would be punished with death, there would still be people failing to do so The cc example is understandable, but the punishment for reason is without reason. It just is, it's a mere tradition, a leftover from other times when people were far less civilized. Again, of all Western countries, the US is the only country which punishes treason with death. Does that make the US superior, or wiser, than all other Western countries? Also, I'm very careful with blaming people for their actions in the sense of 's/he knew what s/he was doing.'. In the words of Red Dawn, the only thing you can charge this guy with, is poor judgement. What threat is this guy at the moment to the US? Will he attempt to destroy the US or something on his own, or organise some kind of islamic sect, which will carry out terrorist attacks on targets in the US? This John Walker make a mistake, so he'll have to live with it. People will remember his actions when they hear his name. Let him live with this disgrace, don't save him from this punishment by some cowardly act. >>
I can see your point there, and even if I don't fully agree with it, it is a valid one. Personally, I agree with the death penalty for treason. I think that an act of treason is an act against humanity. It can put millions of lives at stake. Also, firm punishment acts a a detourer to others. If you knew that you would be killed if you slapped someone, would you slap someone? I don't think so.
I guess if Walker was to admit his wrong, provide substantial evidence against al-queda and bin laden (and I'm talking MAJOR, DEFINITE evidence that leads to the direct aprehension of UBL) then I could see having another, less severe punishment. But until then, he is, and will forever be, a traitor.
Further, who is to say what this radical will do if he is let go. Maybe he will form an underground american taliban or al-queda. Who's to say, but why risk it?