Post some Macro/Closeup Photos

[Bootprint]

Moth
Skink
Frog
Dragonfly


CPU pins
HD head


Nikon 995, except the dragonfly which was with a 950.

 

[Bassyhead]

wow some pretty nice macros!

 

[virtuamike]

#1
#2
#3
#4
#5
#6
#7

Canon S45

 

[shekondar]

Originally posted by: virtuamike
#3
#4
#5
#6
#7

Canon S45

:shocked::shocked:

 

[DaWhim]

count the pixel!!!

I took this pic with my sd10 super macro mod on my laptop screen.

 

[Bootprint]

Originally posted by: shekondar

Originally posted by: virtuamike
#3
#4
#5
#6
#7

Canon S45

:shocked::shocked:

Fuzzing out Whitehouse, its "The Sims" porn.

 

[shekondar]

Playing around with the macro lens...
Inside my computer
Bubbles
Lightning
D70, Sigma 90mm AF Macro

 

[Kalvin00]

Originally posted by: virtuamike
#1
#2
#3
#4
#5
#6
#7

Canon S45

OMG....LOL!!!!!!!

Oh man, that's so great!

 

[GoingUp]

Lirion is gonna pwn all of you Hes an amazing photographer!

 

[toant103]

Originally posted by: jliechty

Originally posted by: toant103
Caution, High Res

Geez, people, what's so hard about doing an Image > Image Size > Width: 700 in PS (or the equivalent in your imaging program of choice)? No freakin way I'm loading that thing on dialup... BTW, is that from the Canon 1Ds or Kodak Pro SLR/n?

low res


using the newest powershot pro1.

 

[toant103]

Originally posted by: halik

Originally posted by: toant103
Caution, High Res

ahaha its the run over man-dog again!

Bruno is doing fine now




Thank God

 

[badmouse]

Great pix gang. Wow.

 

[MikePanic]

check out iPhotoForum.com

 

[ProviaFan]

Originally posted by: toant103
low res

using the newest powershot pro1.

Thanks, that's much better.

BTW, how do you like your new Pro 1? I hear that the noise is bad at the highest ISO; does that affect your pics in real life?

 

[toant103]

Originally posted by: jliechty

Originally posted by: toant103
low res

using the newest powershot pro1.

Thanks, that's much better.

BTW, how do you like your new Pro 1? I hear that the noise is bad at the highest ISO; does that affect your pics in real life?

hahaha, for now, just point and shot for me. Haven't got a chance to mess with it. But the lens are really good. Better than some SLR. This thing got the L series len

 

[ProviaFan]

Originally posted by: toant103
hahaha, for now, just point and shot for me. Haven't got a chance to mess with it. But the lens are really good. Better than some SLR. This thing got the L series len

Yeah, that's what's got me thinking... The lens doesn't beat Canon's real L glass for their SLRs, but it sure does beat the stuff that you could get in combination with a 10D for $2000 or under. So, if one doesn't plan to do anything that would need any special lenses (super-wides, super-teles, macros, or tilt/shift), then the Pro 1 would probably be a better choice. I would be more likely to get one if it weren't for my interest in ultra-high-magnification macro photography (a bellows is next on my list ).

 

[Anubis]

Originally posted by: jliechty

Originally posted by: toant103
low res

using the newest powershot pro1.

Thanks, that's much better.

BTW, how do you like your new Pro 1? I hear that the noise is bad at the highest ISO; does that affect your pics in real life?

may I ask why you purchased the Pro 1 Over day a 300D or D70 which can be had for liek the same price

 

[toant103]

Originally posted by: Anubis

Originally posted by: jliechty

Originally posted by: toant103
low res

using the newest powershot pro1.

Thanks, that's much better.

BTW, how do you like your new Pro 1? I hear that the noise is bad at the highest ISO; does that affect your pics in real life?

may I ask why you purchased the Pro 1 Over day a 300D or D70 which can be had for liek the same price

because i want a good camera without paying extra for the len. I know SLR are pretty good but I can't really afford the lens. For example, the macro len I saw ran like $600 or something like that. But the powershot pro1 is a pretty good all around camera. I'm not that hardcore so the pro1 is fine with me.

 

[ProviaFan]

Originally posted by: Anubis
may I ask why you purchased the Pro 1 Over day a 300D or D70 which can be had for liek the same price

To clear up any potential confusion, I wasn't the one who got the Pro 1, the guy I quoted was.

The Pro 1 comes with a better lens than the kit lens that's with the Rebel (though supposedly the D70 kit lens is a bit better). To get the same kind of lens in a DSLR, you have to pay a lot more for Canon's L glass or Nikon's equivalent, though you do get extra features like IS (VR) and better quality yet. Some people, however, don't want the weight of fast, high quality zooms, and would rather take the small camera with a fixed lens that they'll never need to change anyway. Of course, DSLRs do have other advantages, like very good low light capability (they beat film at high ISOs quite handily), and faster response times, but that kind of stuff doesn't matter as much to some people as it might to me.

Edit: he posted faster than I did and cleared it all up anyway.

 

[toant103]

Originally posted by: jliechty

Originally posted by: Anubis
may I ask why you purchased the Pro 1 Over day a 300D or D70 which can be had for liek the same price

To clear up any potential confusion, I wasn't the one who got the Pro 1, the guy I quoted was.

The Pro 1 comes with a better lens than the kit lens that's with the Rebel (though supposedly the D70 kit lens is a bit better). To get the same kind of lens in a DSLR, you have to pay a lot more for Canon's L glass or Nikon's equivalent, though you do get extra features like IS (VR) and better quality yet. Some people, however, don't want the weight of fast, high quality zooms, and would rather take the small camera with a fixed lens that they'll never need to change anyway. Of course, DSLRs do have other advantages, like very good low light capability (they beat film at high ISOs quite handily), and faster response times, but that kind of stuff doesn't matter as much to some people as it might to me.

Edit: he posted faster than I did and cleared it all up anyway.

Thanks. I can't justify paying for like $600 for the len but the camera only cost $900

 

[Anubis]

Originally posted by: toant103

Originally posted by: Anubis

Originally posted by: jliechty

Originally posted by: toant103
low res

using the newest powershot pro1.

Thanks, that's much better.

BTW, how do you like your new Pro 1? I hear that the noise is bad at the highest ISO; does that affect your pics in real life?

may I ask why you purchased the Pro 1 Over day a 300D or D70 which can be had for liek the same price

because i want a good camera without paying extra for the len. I know SLR are pretty good but I can't really afford the lens. For example, the macro len I saw ran like $600 or something like that. But the powershot pro1 is a pretty good all around camera. I'm not that hardcore so the pro1 is fine with me.

good points, personally I had had it with P&S and Pseudo P7S digitals and needed one that acted like a film camera, so i got a D70 because I allready had a bnch of Nikon Lenses for my Film Camera (F100), Granted the lens investrment is a bit more mone but IMO worth it, Ill bet getting a 180mm Macro soon, which will run me 500-800$ depending on what one and who makes it, The Sigam and Tamron variants of the 105mm f/.2.8 and the 180mm f/2.8 macro lenses are on equal footing with the Nikon ones, and cost less, I would assume that they are on teh same level as the canon L lenses but knowing nothing about Canon lenses im not sure

 

[Jeff7181]

Flower (not 56k friendly)

Olympus C-3020
ISO 100, 1/100 second, F7.0

 

[Kelemvor]

Playing with our new camera....

Nose

Eyes

 

[kuk]

Canon Powershot A70:
Very tiny crab at a reef
Passion flower

Check the link in my sig for more pics.

 

[Electrode]

Originally posted by: shekondar
Inside my computer

CORE MEMORY? :Q

Man, you need to upgrade!