Pride Goeth Before The Fall

[Orsorum]

Originally posted by: RadBrad

Originally posted by: Perknose

Originally posted by: RadBrad

Originally posted by: Perknose

Oh contrare, My opinion is shaped by and also shapes my party.

<a class=ftalternatingbarlinklarge href="http://www.winternet.com/~mikelr/flame31.html" target=blank>Au contraire.</A> It's, you know, <STRONG>FRENCH!! :Q:disgust: </STRONG>

Grammarian usually has little to contribute to a discussion and possesses few effective weapons. To compensate, he will point out minor errors in spelling and grammar. Because of Grammarian's obvious weakness most Warriors ignore him. Thanks for pointing out my spelling errors, :disgust:

It was MORE than a spelling error, pinhead, you obviously had no fvcking idea where the phrase came from.

And thanks for quoting from the link I made, you regrettably lack the higher cognitive powers to aprehend a little self-deprecating irony. What a semi-literate twerp! :|

Grammarian usually has little to contribute to a discussion and possesses few effective weapons. To compensate, he will point out minor errors in spelling and grammar. Because of Grammarian's obvious weakness most Warriors ignore him. Thanks for pointing out my GRAMMER errors,

You're right, you do have little to offer this conversation!

 

[Hayabusa Rider]

Well, looks like we have another willing candidate for our own Einsatzgruppen.

 

[RadBrad]

Originally posted by: Perknose

Originally posted by: RadBrad

Originally posted by: Perknose

<a class=ftalternatingbarlinklarge href="http://pics.bbzzdd.com/users/SuperD/george.jpg" target=blank>I will be loyal to my party regardless of what i agree or disagree with.</A>

I've noticed It really bothers you when someone has a backbone that you obviously lack.

You think<STRONG> I</STRONG> lack a backbone, you dim-witted little punk? I not only have a backbone, but a brain and the ability to think for myself, something you proudly proclaim you lack, you party-humping dweeb. :|

I know you have no backbone, that is shown by the way you attack someone with whom you disagree, some one that
you envy, someone that has core beliefs. If you can't take it you really shouldn't dish it out.

Now, I didn,t come here to sh!t on your thread. Nor did I come to get sh!t on. I come to take from your link
what you chose not to take from it and render my opinion, to offer balance to your post.

Was this not the purpose of your thread?





:evil:

 

[DealMonkey]

Originally posted by: RadBradThe sentence is very self explanitory. " Btw the global chaos he refers to would be the new socialist (being government that takes care of us cradle to coffin) appeasment (being a government that beleives our rights are less important than other countries citizens) order(like the eu) the democratic party(crazy people) wishes to push(agenda) forward ."

You must have missed the part of Bush's presidency when he spent 100s of Billions of U.S. tax dollars on the Iraqi people instead of the U.S. people. Oh yes, and the part where he spent $400 Billion, scratch that, $534 Billion over the next ten years on expanded entitlement programs for seniors. Although, in retrospect, you ignoring all of this despite your obvious displeasure with it, falls neatly in line with your "I will be loyal to my party regardless of what i agree or disagree with" statement. Geeze, what would Bush have to do to get on your bad side? Flip you off, blow up your car and bang your sister?

 

[Perknose]

know you have no backbone, that is shown by the way you attack someone with whom you disagree, some one that
you envy, someone that has core beliefs. If you can't take it you really shouldn't dish it out.

Now, I didn,t come here to sh!t on your thread. Nor did I come to get sh!t on. I come to take from your link
what you chose not to take from it and render my opinion, to offer balance to your post.

Was this not the purpose of your thread?

I had no problem with your posts until you said, <FONT face=Tahoma color=#000080>I will be loyal to my party regardless of what i agree or disagree with.</FONT>, which is deserving of all the ridicule that can be heaped on it, by any thinking person. Your obvious ignorance of the pharse "au contraire" is so slight, that I tempered my tutoring by including the self-deprecating link to the Grammarian, which also obviously went right over your head.

Then, you want to tell me that I have no backbone, you misinformed little fvck? You're fvcking with the wrong liberal, leroy. :|

 

[Wanescotting]

Let me explain something to you all.........
The United states may well be isolating itself, BUT if you are right , even when everyone else disagrees, that constitutes a MAJORITY OF ONE so the u.n. can bite it..............

 

[sandorski]

That article is spot on, America changed, the World virtually stayed the same.

It's sh1tty that sh1t happens, but it does. When it does it can lead to your destruction or you can get over it and move on.

 

[Mill]

Originally posted by: Perknose

\

Then, you want to tell me that I have no backbone, you misinformed little fvck? You're fvcking with the wrong liberal, leroy. :|

You have no backbone Perknose. Seriously, you are getting outraged and threatening over a casual debate. Outrated I could understand... "fvcking with the wrong liberal" is just silly. What are you going to do? Tie him to a tree and make him read Hilary's book?

 

[chess9]

Brz. has made understanding Americans way too complicated.

Here's how I explain our invasion of Iraq and our treatment of foreigners:

1. Americans have no patience, particularly for details;
2. Americans don't play head games politely;
3. Americans won't give anyone who is different and opposes us the benefit of the doubt. One mistake and you are history, buster;
4. Americans are basically SIMPLISTIC in their approach to the world, so we don't care what the fvsk anyone thinks, especially the U.N.
5. Americans never met a self-doubt they couldn't eradicate instantly.

If any academic or foreigner thinks Americans are pondering the philosophical and historical justifications of our conduct they are dead wrong. On the left it is simple: We shouldn't have invaded Iraq because they weren't a threat. On the right they say: Saddam was a bad boy and could have been a threat. Better safe than sorry. Once you get beyond simple analysis you fail to understand the shallowness of most American thinking. We are too busy to think.

Brz. is engaging in fuzzy-headed over intellectualization of our people and culture. But, it's a very interesting article, Perk.

<note to self: Don't piss off Perknose>
-Robert

 

[Red Dawn]

Originally posted by: RadBrad

Originally posted by: Perknose

Originally posted by: RadBrad

Originally posted by: Perknose

Oh contrare, My opinion is shaped by and also shapes my party.

<a class=ftalternatingbarlinklarge href="http://www.winternet.com/~mikelr/flame31.html" target=blank>Au contraire.</A> It's, you know, <STRONG>FRENCH!! :Q:disgust: </STRONG>

Grammarian usually has little to contribute to a discussion and possesses few effective weapons. To compensate, he will point out minor errors in spelling and grammar. Because of Grammarian's obvious weakness most Warriors ignore him. Thanks for pointing out my spelling errors, :disgust:

It was MORE than a spelling error, pinhead, you obviously had no fvcking idea where the phrase came from.

And thanks for quoting from the link I made, you regrettably lack the higher cognitive powers to aprehend a little self-deprecating irony. What a semi-literate twerp! :|

Grammarian usually has little to contribute to a discussion and possesses few effective weapons. To compensate, he will point out minor errors in spelling and grammar. Because of Grammarian's obvious weakness most Warriors ignore him. Thanks for pointing out my GRAMMER errors,

LOL, did you say Warrior? Wow let me go get my Wizard Hat and Robe so I can join in

 

[etech]

Originally posted by: Mill

Originally posted by: Perknose

\

Then, you want to tell me that I have no backbone, you misinformed little fvck? You're fvcking with the wrong liberal, leroy. :|

You have no backbone Perknose. Seriously, you are getting outraged and threatening over a casual debate. Outrated I could understand... "fvcking with the wrong liberal" is just silly. What are you going to do? Tie him to a tree and make him read Hilary's book?

You should have seen the threads at AGN. Any time anyone got on Perk's wrong side they were invited to fight. Yep, actually physically go fight him over what was said on a message board.

Perk seems to have some anger management issues.

 

[Romans828]

Nice to see Perknose working Bible quotes into his thread titles

 

[Gaard]

I will be loyal to my party regardless of what i agree or disagree with

I know the word 'sheep' gets thrown around a lot here, but I think this is the first time someone has willingly called himself one.

 

[Red Dawn]

Originally posted by: etech

Originally posted by: Mill

Originally posted by: Perknose

\

Then, you want to tell me that I have no backbone, you misinformed little fvck? You're fvcking with the wrong liberal, leroy. :|

You have no backbone Perknose. Seriously, you are getting outraged and threatening over a casual debate. Outrated I could understand... "fvcking with the wrong liberal" is just silly. What are you going to do? Tie him to a tree and make him read Hilary's book?

You should have seen the threads at AGN. Any time anyone got on Perk's wrong side they were invited to fight. Yep, actually physically go fight him over what was said on a message board.

Perk seems to have some anger management issues.

LOL, many of those whom I have argued and fought with in the past happen to be some of my favorite members here. Hell without such divirse opinions this place would be boring.

 

[Mill]

Originally posted by: Red Dawn

Originally posted by: etech

Originally posted by: Mill

Originally posted by: Perknose

\

Then, you want to tell me that I have no backbone, you misinformed little fvck? You're fvcking with the wrong liberal, leroy. :|

You have no backbone Perknose. Seriously, you are getting outraged and threatening over a casual debate. Outrated I could understand... "fvcking with the wrong liberal" is just silly. What are you going to do? Tie him to a tree and make him read Hilary's book?

You should have seen the threads at AGN. Any time anyone got on Perk's wrong side they were invited to fight. Yep, actually physically go fight him over what was said on a message board.

Perk seems to have some anger management issues.

LOL, many of those whom I have argued and fought with in the past happen to be some of my favorite members here. Hell without such divirse opinions this place would be boring.

Hey, I'm just messing around with him. I thought it was funny how he reacted like that. Reminds me of me minus the physical violence part.

 

[Mill]

Originally posted by: Red Dawn

Originally posted by: etech

Originally posted by: Mill

Originally posted by: Perknose

\

Then, you want to tell me that I have no backbone, you misinformed little fvck? You're fvcking with the wrong liberal, leroy. :|

You have no backbone Perknose. Seriously, you are getting outraged and threatening over a casual debate. Outrated I could understand... "fvcking with the wrong liberal" is just silly. What are you going to do? Tie him to a tree and make him read Hilary's book?

You should have seen the threads at AGN. Any time anyone got on Perk's wrong side they were invited to fight. Yep, actually physically go fight him over what was said on a message board.

Perk seems to have some anger management issues.

LOL, many of those whom I have argued and fought with in the past happen to be some of my favorite members here. Hell without such divirse opinions this place would be boring.

Hey, I'm just messing around with him. I thought it was funny how he reacted like that. Reminds me of me minus the physical violence part.

 

[Mill]

Originally posted by: Red Dawn

Originally posted by: etech

Originally posted by: Mill

Originally posted by: Perknose

\

Then, you want to tell me that I have no backbone, you misinformed little fvck? You're fvcking with the wrong liberal, leroy. :|

You have no backbone Perknose. Seriously, you are getting outraged and threatening over a casual debate. Outrated I could understand... "fvcking with the wrong liberal" is just silly. What are you going to do? Tie him to a tree and make him read Hilary's book?

You should have seen the threads at AGN. Any time anyone got on Perk's wrong side they were invited to fight. Yep, actually physically go fight him over what was said on a message board.

Perk seems to have some anger management issues.

LOL, many of those whom I have argued and fought with in the past happen to be some of my favorite members here. Hell without such divirse opinions this place would be boring.

Hey, I'm just messing around with him. I thought it was funny how he reacted like that. Reminds me of me minus the physical violence part.

 

[Mill]

Originally posted by: Red Dawn

Originally posted by: etech

Originally posted by: Mill

Originally posted by: Perknose

\

Then, you want to tell me that I have no backbone, you misinformed little fvck? You're fvcking with the wrong liberal, leroy. :|

You have no backbone Perknose. Seriously, you are getting outraged and threatening over a casual debate. Outrated I could understand... "fvcking with the wrong liberal" is just silly. What are you going to do? Tie him to a tree and make him read Hilary's book?

You should have seen the threads at AGN. Any time anyone got on Perk's wrong side they were invited to fight. Yep, actually physically go fight him over what was said on a message board.

Perk seems to have some anger management issues.

LOL, many of those whom I have argued and fought with in the past happen to be some of my favorite members here. Hell without such divirse opinions this place would be boring.

Hey, I'm just messing around with him. I thought it was funny how he reacted like that. Reminds me of me minus the physical violence part.

 

[Moonbeam]

Originally posted by: Mill

Originally posted by: Red Dawn

Originally posted by: etech

Originally posted by: Mill

Originally posted by: Perknose

\

Then, you want to tell me that I have no backbone, you misinformed little fvck? You're fvcking with the wrong liberal, leroy. :|

You have no backbone Perknose. Seriously, you are getting outraged and threatening over a casual debate. Outrated I could understand... "fvcking with the wrong liberal" is just silly. What are you going to do? Tie him to a tree and make him read Hilary's book?

You should have seen the threads at AGN. Any time anyone got on Perk's wrong side they were invited to fight. Yep, actually physically go fight him over what was said on a message board.

Perk seems to have some anger management issues.

LOL, many of those whom I have argued and fought with in the past happen to be some of my favorite members here. Hell without such divirse opinions this place would be boring.

Hey, I'm just messing around with him. I thought it was funny how he reacted like that. Reminds me of me minus the physical violence part.

I'm starting to want to kill you. How many times do you need to say that?

 

[LordMagnusKain]

But an American policy that rests on a self-indulgent fiction must be expected to come to a bad end.

We're trying as well as we can, sometimes we error, sometimes we lie, cheat, steel and murder but overall we've got a good goal in mind. That our views rest on self-indulgent fiction is not supported by the artical and the their is a constant begging of the question; this whole argument that America is wrong is predicated on a pre-standing notion that America is wrong

. Something close to Huntington's war of civilizations has begun. National mobilization has already taken place. Years of struggle lie ahead.

fair enough, this is a third world war, given how civilized the world is it's amazing we've only got to deal with gorillas w/out WMDs.

Most advanced societies have already had, or have, their wars with "terrorism"

the major differences are that 1.)alquida has full nations with lots of backing that push forward 'education' in American killing terrorist thought. 2.) other terrorists are generally 'freedom fighters' while the terrorist we face aren't trying to get land, they are trying to destroy 'evil' society 3.) a 'political' arm that has number of requests and a definite number of concessions that will end the terror w/ the others; nothing but America putting aside all of it's liberal freedoms and becoming an Islamic nation will appease the terrorists we face.

It is the United States that has changed. They are disturbed that American leaders seem unable to understand this.

What other nations 'understand' about us is of little consequence as long as they help us in our fight to stem the flow of terrorists that want to destroy Christian and Secular society. that 'nothing can be the same' is a function of how America has been awoken from it's decadent sleep of ignorance to those that want to end society. If others want to stew in decadence that's fine, but America has always put-aside it's self-fulfillment to stand up against the evils of the world.

the source of the problem lies in how the United States has conducted itself since September 2001.

people who hate us will hate us forever, those that disagree with the stand-up American values will never come around to agreeing with taking it head-on and ignoring the bruises as we fight for a noble goal. We can't expect them to, but we can ask they they not fan the flames of anti-Americanism.

A French writer has put it this way: it has been like discovering that a respected, even beloved, uncle has slipped into schizophrenia.

the French people have never liked us, they never will, we are to similar; Truly, the 'elite media' pushes a socialism agenda across Europe; and unlike in America the conservatives have little to no voice. In the end many people around the world see we are trying to fight those that want to bring down society, other countries have submitted to this: some blame America for being so 'evil' and thus 'deserving' it. But over all we're still the lesser of 2 evils and we're going to fight the other evil as hard as we can to keep our innocents from being murdered.

Actually what RadBrad is talking about is the rise in America of the same psychological factors that were present when Hitler began his quest for power, a profound inferiority complex masked by titanic arrogance.

did you know Hitler was a vegetarian painter...
:shakes head; what a clown.

 

[TheBDB]

he French people have never liked us, they never will, we are to smaller

 

[DealMonkey]

Word. LordGhengisKhan, or whatever the hell your name is, you seriously need to ask Jesus for a spell/grammar checker for your computer. Ugh. It's intolerable.

 

[LordMagnusKain]

Originally posted by: TheBDB

he French people have never liked us, they never will, we are to smaller

Originally posted by: DealMonkey
Word. LordGhengisKhan, or whatever the hell your name is, you seriously need to ask Jesus for a spell/grammar checker for your computer. Ugh. It's intolerable.

I'm w/ Perk on this one:

Originally posted by: Perknose Au contraire. ... :Q:disgust:

let's give the most important Cliff-note for those who don't like my muddled correspondence.

Most advanced societies have already had, or have, their wars with "terrorism"

the major differences are :
1.) alquida has full nations with backing that pay for 'educating' people to hold pro-American-murder views.

2.) other terrorists are generally 'freedom fighters', or at lest hid in that guise, while on the other hand the terrorist we face aren't trying to get land or rights, they are trying to destroy 'evil' society.

3.) other organizations have a 'political' arm that has number of requests and a definite number of concessions that will end the terror w/ the others; nothing but America putting aside all of it's liberal freedoms and becoming an Islamic nation will appease the terrorists we face.

 

[CADsortaGUY]

Originally posted by: etech

Originally posted by: Mill

Originally posted by: Perknose
Then, you want to tell me that I have no backbone, you misinformed little fvck? You're fvcking with the wrong liberal, leroy. :|

You have no backbone Perknose. Seriously, you are getting outraged and threatening over a casual debate. Outrated I could understand... "fvcking with the wrong liberal" is just silly. What are you going to do? Tie him to a tree and make him read Hilary's book?

You should have seen the threads at AGN. Any time anyone got on Perk's wrong side they were invited to fight. Yep, actually physically go fight him over what was said on a message board.

Perk seems to have some anger management issues.

Perknose=HardWarrior?

<- still waiting for HW to come punch me in the nose.

CkG

 

[Moonbeam]

<- still waiting for HW to come punch me in the nose.

CkG
-------------
That sort of sounds like something you would do. Take your time.