imported_tss4
Golden Member
- Jun 30, 2004
- 1,607
- 0
- 0
Originally posted by: joshsquall
Originally posted by: tss4
Originally posted by: joshsquall
Originally posted by: tss4
Originally posted by: joshsquall
Originally posted by: tss4
Originally posted by: zendari
You're probably right. It's acceptable for the people in New Orleans, wouldn't work in other places.Originally posted by: Red Dawn
Acceptable for whom? I bet if it was done in some Hick Fundie Township in North Carolina there would be outrage by the local Bible Thumpers, many of whom don't believe that Catholicism (it's a Catholic Festival) is really ChristianityOriginally posted by: zendari
That's a acceptable cultural parade for everyone, not a deviant sin-promoting perversion for heretics and queers.
I guess anyone who disagress with the Massachusetts ideology is an extremist. Not suprised.
Short of Howard Dean, I doubt there is a leftwinged extremist to someone like you.
That's my point, let them be. What works for you, doesn't work for them and vice versa. They won't make you hide that you're straight or a christian because you have the american right to be free and they in turn deserve the same right.
And I don't know why you degenerated into an attack on liberal ideology.
I agree. They have the right to be whatever they want to be.
Let's get back to the topic of the thread: Christians permitting gay marriage.. It's completely different from legalizing gay marriage or even accepting gays.
We have come a long ways from the topic. Anyway, I still don't see the problem. You're free to worship the lord however you like. Why can't they? You interpret it differently. Different interpretations are the reason we have about a million different christion denominations. If you have a problem with this, you should have a problem with the existance of all those other sects and their different beliefs.
I don't have a problem with them worshipping or attending Church. I do have a problem with them endorsing gay marriage. Different sects don't do things that are sinful, they just believe different things about the history of the Church, who can interpret the Bible, and how one is saved. Christian marriage is defined as between a man and a woman, in the Bible. I just don't understand how the members of the UCC can promote something which is against the Bible. Accept and love gays, but don't encourage them to live with one another and have sexual relationships.
And that's where you're wrong. I grew up Southern Baptist. It is a sin under the teachings of Southern Baptists to drink alcohol. The body is a temple. All of the other denominations were wrong in allowing and sometimes even encouraging drinking. Another example would be a lady that lived on my block belonged to a congragation that said it was a sin to gamble. Yet, I knew another person that had raffles at thier church. These are all inconsistincies in what is believed to be a sin as expressed by the bible. If you can live with these inconsistincies then you shouldn't have a problem with the UCC worshipping in its own way.
I don't live with these inconsistincies.. that's why I'm not Southern Baptist or Unitarian or Methodist or Catholic or any of the others.
So then, you speak only for your denomination. A huge part of Christians do belong to these denominations and are subject to my point. Just curoius, what denomination are you?