M3 Pro, you mean?I should count the number of times I wrote this: if you want to look at something that scales well in GB, look at the Ray Tracer score. You'll notice that Oryon is about 19% faster than M3.
Sorry, yes, I picked the data you showed, so that's M3 Pro.M3 Pro, you mean?
That's why Oryon should be beating them easily.Hawk is cheapo devices this year.
Because you didn't mark this as a question and that is a good thing.Btw why doesn't this thread have the functionality of upvoting/downvoting comments?
OoooBecause you didn't mark this as a question and that is a good thing.
YO WE HAVE SINGLE THREAD POWER CURVES FOR THE FIRST TIME!!!!!Some new numbers from Qualcomm.Qualcomm says Snapdragon X Elite kicks Intel Core Ultra's butt, too
Qualcomm now has Intel's Core Ultra (Meteor Lake) chips in its labs to compare against its own Snapdragon X Elite -- and company executives claim that the X Elite blows them out of the water, too.www.pcworld.com
Are you sure that you understand what these are showing?ST power consumption in excess of 10W sounds concerning.
Doesn’t matter how far they *can* push it. What matters is the shape of the curve. It’s also Windows and they’ll have multiple SKUs. That 13-14W or so is at the absolute peak of their ST (aka 4.3GHz) almost certainly.ST power consumption in excess of 10W sounds concerning.
ST power consumption in excess of 10W sounds concerning.
It's in like $700 devices now.Laptops with Hawk Point- like Zephyrus G14 which start at $1600 beg to disagree with you.
Am I missing something? Isn't these slides showing that X Elite is matching Intel Core Ultra peak while using 40% of the power (10W x 25W) in single core?ST power consumption in excess of 10W sounds concerning.
That's equivalent to kicking toddlers down.while outpacing Intel best at any point.
The relevant graph is versus PHX.Isn't these slides showing that X Elite is matching Intel Core Ultra peak while using 40% of the power (10W x 25W) in single core?
Right. Phoenix cores and X Elite are a very impressive showpiece, specially given that they're beating current gen competition.The relevant graph is versus PHX.
Precisely. It’s profoundly weird to think otherwise especially for this case with their SKUs and Windows.Yes, yes, doomed Qualcomm, etc. We get it.
10W single-core power at highest part of the DVFS curve is not horrendously high for a PC core. At all.
Yeah that what you get for being a year late.So it's kinda "eh".
Yes that’s correct. It outdoes AMD too.Am I missing something? Isn't these slides showing that X Elite is matching Intel Core Ultra peak while using 40% of the power (10W x 25W) in single core?
To me these slides just show that QCOM core can scale from low-end of the power curve to the high-end of the curve while outpacing Intel best at any point.
That 13W peak power is certainly higher than Apple M3Am I missing something? Isn't these slides showing that X Elite is matching Intel Core Ultra peak while using 40% of the power (10W x 25W) in single core?
To me these slides just show that QCOM core can scale from low-end of the power curve to the high-end of the curve while outpacing Intel best at any point.
Very good, considering almost 1/2 of most users spend their PC time in a Web browser.Looks like good JavaScript scores.
Designed with the modern web (bloat) in mind much like Firestorm and its ilk.
I too, am wondering this.When will they detail the microarchitecture? Hot chips?