So mass produced Adreno 830 1.15 GHz will do ~130, and the mass produced Adreno 830 1.25 GHz will do ~140.QRD Adreno 830 at 1.15GHz only runs 125 on Aztec 2K. Should be a little higher on mass produced devices. (like 88-89 on 8G3 qrd and 94-95 on mass produced)
I don't think that's necessary. Apple's GPU architecture journey started when they acquired some patent from imagination, and since then Apple has developed their GPU in-house, without acquiring any companies (they have hired engineers from Nvidia/AMD though). Now Apple's GPU architecture has advanced to such an extent, it's better than Adreno and Mali.Nothing for it, Qualcomm will have to buy Intel for their GPU prowess
It's still one SoC design on the same process node.So mass produced Adreno 830 1.15 GHz will do ~130, and the mass produced Adreno 830 1.25 GHz will do ~140.
I wouldn't say so at the moment - it tends to go back and forth from one gen to the next.Now Apple's GPU architecture has advanced to such an extent, it's better than Adreno and Mali
Apple has been evolving their GPU architecture, instead of just upping the core count and pumping the clock speeds. They have been adding desktop-grade features and improving compute performance. They have embarked on the road of making it a Nvidia-like top tier GPU architecture. Remember, this is the same GPU architecture that powers Macs.I wouldn't say so at the moment - it tends to go back and forth from one gen to the next.
That's not even getting into HW RT which is still pretty up for grabs at the moment across the entire GPU design industry.
PS: Wikipedia page on Adreno contains some nice info;Sebastian Aaltonen comments again about GPU architecture of Qualcomm.
Adreno already conforms to desktop gfx API features and has done for some time.Remember, this is the same GPU architecture that powers Macs
It’s not that the benchmark is bad, it’s just that is what Adreno so far is designed for. Adreno’s GPU cores have double the FP16 compute, of course at the at the expense of other features. Space is finite.that Aztec ruins score is higher than M4 where it scores 110fps and in WLE M4 is around 60fps.
So just shows how bad GFXbench is.
It seems most people don't buy this rumour, saying that there is no way a phone can reach 5 GHz.
It seems most people don't buy this rumour, saying that there is no way a phone can reach 5 GHz.
Although the leaker is fairly reliable, and this isn't the first time that 8 Gen 5 is rumoured to be clocking at 5 GHz.
It does sound unbelievable though. That's basically the same clock speed as Intel/AMD's latest laptop processors (LNL/STX- 5.1 GHz).
True. Apple hired a lead architect from Nvidia a few years ago. He is now responsible for GPU architecture. https://www.linkedin.com/in/olivier-giroux-47101467/Apple has been evolving their GPU architecture, instead of just upping the core count and pumping the clock speeds. They have been adding desktop-grade features and improving compute performance. They have embarked on the road of making it a Nvidia-like top tier GPU architecture. Remember, this is the same GPU architecture that powers Macs.
PS: Wikipedia page on Adreno contains some nice info;
That's called Graphics Core Next, big dawg.They have embarked on the road of making it a Nvidia-like top tier GPU architecture.
Active cooling and >10W 1t power and there you go.there is no way a phone can reach 5 GHz
Snapdragon 8 Gen 4's Adreno 830 GPU lands in Geekbench OpenCL test;
About a 35% performance uplift from Adreno 750.
samsung SM-S938B - Geekbench
Benchmark results for a samsung SM-S938B with a Qualcomm ARMv8 processor.browser.geekbench.com
12 Compute Units (6 Shader Processors); same core count as 8 Gen 3 (Adreno 750).
That's because the actual clocks are about 4.1 GHz.Decent bit lower than I would expect on the single core though with such high clocks speed