QX6700 cooling ?

hennessy1

Golden Member
Mar 18, 2007
1,901
5
91
I have a qx6700 comming on monday and I wanted to kno what would the best aftermarket hs&f be for it can you please help. I am looking for one with hs&f in one, aluminum & copper hs, no backplate to install, and the fan has to be on the top of the hs not the sides. Can you please help me.
 

JAG87

Diamond Member
Jan 3, 2006
3,921
3
76
Originally posted by: Toadster
i'm using a Zalman CNPS9500 - highest temps i've seen are 58C but i'm OC'ed to 3.2GHz as well

thats pure bs if you ask me. and if its indeed bs (I cant say for sure) its pretty lame of you to lie about temperatures.

unless your room temperature is 15C there is no way you are getting 58C load with a CNPS9500. I have a CNPS9700NT and I get around 62C at 100% load. my room temperature is 25C, and I am also at 3.2 GHz (266x12). so unless you have a special CNPS9500, I dont see how you load at 58C.

do you run your case open and have a room fan blowing on your motherboard?
or are you wearing gloves and scarf right now?
 

JAG87

Diamond Member
Jan 3, 2006
3,921
3
76
as a base to my premise id like to add this article

http://www.bit-tech.net/hardware/2007/0...ga775_heatsink_group_test_mar07/8.html

where they test a 955XE (130W TDP) which is the same as the QX6700. The chip is lapped, and the test bed is most likely open air (mobo on top of cardboard box). They get 56C under load, with the fan on full, with 25C ambient.

you say you get 58C with a QX6700 at 3.2 GHz (which is higher than 130W), inside a case (unless you are one of the few who keeps their panels off for normal operation).

I call BS. Unless you care to add a few details about your setup (such as open air, closed case, lapped, non lapped and so on).
 

JAG87

Diamond Member
Jan 3, 2006
3,921
3
76
and here is another article which again proves that you are skimming on your temperature reports (I honestly dont know why one would do that, its so lame).
http://www.anandtech.com/casecooling/showdoc.aspx?i=2932&p=5
as you can see, a CNPS9500 and an X6800 at 3.73 GHz gives a temperature of 58C.





now using this handy website you can see how an X6800 at 3733 MHz (using an insane voltage of 1.6V) spits out 157W.

using the same calculation, a QX6700 at 3200 MHz (1.25v) spits out 156W.





so lets analyze this,

anand was most likely running an open air bench test, and their X6800 was nowhere near 157W. anand was definetely NOT using 1.6v on their X6800, but lets say they were for the sake of this argument. they reported 58C under load.

you should be running a closed case, and your QX6700 should be at 156W (if you are at 1.25v, which I doubt since your vcore is probably AUTO and your mobo is probably giving your cpu +0.05 to +0.1v). you are also reporting 58C under load.

someone is lying. and its you my friend.
 

myocardia

Diamond Member
Jun 21, 2003
9,291
30
91
Originally posted by: JAG87
someone is lying. and its you my friend.
He doesn't have a QX6700, man. I'm sure his E6400 loads @ around 58C with a Zalman 9500, since that isn't much of a heatsink.
 

myocardia

Diamond Member
Jun 21, 2003
9,291
30
91
Henessy, you won't be overclocking much at all with a QX6700, unless you have one of the three best air coolers available: the Tuniq Tower 120 (the worst of the best), the Thermalright Ultra 120 Extreme (not the normal Ultra 120), or the best of the best, this one: the Vigor Monsoon II. Of course, none of those heatsinks have a downward blowing fan. There's only one decent heatsink that has a downward blowing fan, the new Thermaltake Big Typhoon. I wouldn't try to overclock a QX6700 with that Thermaltake, though.
 

hennessy1

Golden Member
Mar 18, 2007
1,901
5
91
well i wouldnt be doing any extreme oc prob just to a 3ghz clock speed could I get away with that?
 

Seraphiel

Member
Dec 30, 2006
31
0
0
Originally posted by: hennessy1
well i wouldnt be doing any extreme oc prob just to a 3ghz clock speed could I get away with that?

You could get away with that using the stock cooler, but get a better cooler anyways.

I use the Tuniq Tower 120 and I am satisfied.
 

DrMrLordX

Lifer
Apr 27, 2000
22,538
12,404
136
Originally posted by: myocardia
Henessy, you won't be overclocking much at all with a QX6700, unless you have one of the three best air coolers available: the Tuniq Tower 120 (the worst of the best), the Thermalright Ultra 120 Extreme (not the normal Ultra 120), or the best of the best, this one: the Vigor Monsoon II. Of course, none of those heatsinks have a downward blowing fan. There's only one decent heatsink that has a downward blowing fan, the new Thermaltake Big Typhoon. I wouldn't try to overclock a QX6700 with that Thermaltake, though.

Don't underestimate the Big Typhoon VX. Feed it with a side-intake duct/vent and give it a 100+ cfm fan, and it will cool better than a Tuniq Tower 120. In fact, with its included 86.5 cfm fan, I'm guessing the VX outperforms the Tuniq Tower 120 as-is:

http://forum.abit-usa.com/showthread.php?t=103462&page=4

All you need to do is let the Big Typhoon VX breathe and it does its job right. Cooling a QX6700 is a daunting task, however, that may be best left to chilled water.
 

Tegeril

Platinum Member
Apr 2, 2003
2,906
5
81
Arctic Freezer 7 Pro - idles at 31-34C (not core temps, my full load numbers are), with a full load the cores never eclipse 60C unless the room is very hot. Arctic Freezer always at 2700RPMs --> 10x300 for 3ghz on the QX6700 (stock voltage).
 

aigomorla

CPU, Cases&Cooling Mod PC Gaming Mod Elite Member
Super Moderator
Sep 28, 2005
21,019
3,490
126
uhhh... okey lemme tell the op something.. ive had a QX also so i know these babies.

QX6700 are hot ass mofo's. Straight up, they been known to over exceed 226W TEC's at high OC's, and Burn out phase units on consistant usage.

So a CPS9500 @ sub 60 load? I have to agree with the guys above, i call MAJOR shins on this.

Now on my Watersetup, i was getting high 40's at a nice 3.5ghz OC when i had it. Then my board went POOF. Stupid Striker...

So, if you really wanna crank that girl to her tops, your only option is water. If you just aim for a mild OC, then i suggest you return that chip, and wait for the Q6600 to drop in price. Its just not worth it otherwise...


And for those of you guys calling shins on my high 40's, E6600 will only have AT most a 5-7C difference on a nice waterblock.
http://i125.photobucket.com/albums/p73/aigomorla/FinalTemp.jpg


But i definitely have to agree, most people on a QX with 1.4V + oc come asking me for water advice, because even at that spec, there tuniq is majorly overloaded.


Also that review on the CPS9700 and 9500

CPU voltage: 1.5875V

uhhhh.... The writter has to be on CRACK. Duvi clearly showed that the MAX voltage you can go on air is 1.5V on C2D. You try orthosing for 6+ hours at 1.5875V, I PROMISE you your gonna hit thermal throttle at around 55min. And if your lucky your comp will shut down 20 min later, or just reboot.

Just to be clear, my comp on my water at 1.58V will throttle at 7 hours. So dont even try to say your AIR cooling is better.

http://i125.photobucket.com/albums/p73/aigomorla/IMG_0574.jpg

LASTLY, this thread belongs in the case and cooling section. Just to let you know. It would fit here, if you had problems OCing, not cooling


So op, if you are going to OC, i suggest you keep it under 1.4V. And you get the biggest, and most effective Towr AIR cooler you can afford.

IFX-14 by thermalright seems to look nice.
 

Muhadib

Member
Jan 11, 2005
168
0
0
The Thermalright Ultra 120 Extreme is the best air cooling you can get. If have money to burn then spend $150 on a peltier sink like the Vigor Monsoon II. The performance surely does not justify the price, not to mention the extra power needed to fule the peltier portion of the rig.
 

aigomorla

CPU, Cases&Cooling Mod PC Gaming Mod Elite Member
Super Moderator
Sep 28, 2005
21,019
3,490
126
Originally posted by: Muhadib
The Thermalright Ultra 120 Extreme is the best air cooling you can get. If have money to burn then spend $150 on a peltier sink like the Vigor Monsoon II. The performance surely does not justify the price, not to mention the extra power needed to fule the peltier portion of the rig.

NO THIS DOES NOT WORK.

WHY WONT YOU PEOPLE LEARN WHAT TEC's REALLY ARE?!?!!?

IM SO FED UP WITH PEOPLE PRETENDING TO KNOW WHAT A TEC IS AND RECOMENDING CRAPPY AIR TEC SOLUTIONS LIKE THE MONSOON. THIS IS EXACTLY WHY THIS KIND OF POST NEEDS TO BE IN TEH CASE AND COOLING SECTION.

Sorry for typing caps, but it really pisses me off that people are recomending things like the monsoon. You start talking about monsoon over at XS forums, and THEY will seriously LAUGH at your face. Honestly did you read my post above? i said these things are KNOWN to overexceed 226W tec, and you think a Monsoon with a DOWNVOLTED 60W TEC can handle it?

XS Forums ultimate guide to TEC's

READ it. Learn from it. If your going to TEC, you need to master water. If you want a crappy toy TEC like the monsoon or classes like that, then GET A IFX-14 By thermalright. THATS THERE NEW KING. NO ITS NOT THE ULTRA 120, its the IFX-14. AND THAT WILL PWN the monsoon vigor. No contest, game over.

SO GET IT RIGHT. People recomending crappy stuff like this only brings more problems to guys like me over at the case and cooling forum. Because WE have to help fix it.

So no dont recomend crappy stuff like that tec product, or even a zalman waterkit, or koolance, or thermalcrap.

Either you cool a QX down properly, or you dont OC at all. Thats all there is to it.

http://www.thermalright.com/a_page/main_product_ifx14.htm

So dont tell me anymore the ultra120 is the king. ITS NOT.
 

DrMrLordX

Lifer
Apr 27, 2000
22,538
12,404
136
Whew, relax man. Most folks in here were saying the Tuniq Tower 120 was the best aircooling money can buy for awhile, even though both the Big Typhoon and the Ultra 120 (and the Ultra 120 Extreme) can beat it with the right fan.

The IFX-14 looks pretty good, but do you have any benchmark/review links for it? I'm curious as to how well it stacks up against other high-end coolers.
 

GFORCE100

Golden Member
Oct 9, 1999
1,102
0
76
Originally posted by: aigomorla
Originally posted by: Muhadib
The Thermalright Ultra 120 Extreme is the best air cooling you can get. If have money to burn then spend $150 on a peltier sink like the Vigor Monsoon II. The performance surely does not justify the price, not to mention the extra power needed to fule the peltier portion of the rig.

NO THIS DOES NOT WORK.

WHY WONT YOU PEOPLE LEARN WHAT TEC's REALLY ARE?!?!!?

IM SO FED UP WITH PEOPLE PRETENDING TO KNOW WHAT A TEC IS AND RECOMENDING CRAPPY AIR TEC SOLUTIONS LIKE THE MONSOON. THIS IS EXACTLY WHY THIS KIND OF POST NEEDS TO BE IN TEH CASE AND COOLING SECTION.

Sorry for typing caps, but it really pisses me off that people are recomending things like the monsoon. You start talking about monsoon over at XS forums, and THEY will seriously LAUGH at your face. Honestly did you read my post above? i said these things are KNOWN to overexceed 226W tec, and you think a Monsoon with a DOWNVOLTED 60W TEC can handle it?

XS Forums ultimate guide to TEC's

READ it. Learn from it. If your going to TEC, you need to master water. If you want a crappy toy TEC like the monsoon or classes like that, then GET A IFX-14 By thermalright. THATS THERE NEW KING. NO ITS NOT THE ULTRA 120, its the IFX-14. AND THAT WILL PWN the monsoon vigor. No contest, game over.

SO GET IT RIGHT. People recomending crappy stuff like this only brings more problems to guys like me over at the case and cooling forum. Because WE have to help fix it.

So no dont recomend crappy stuff like that tec product, or even a zalman waterkit, or koolance, or thermalcrap.

Either you cool a QX down properly, or you dont OC at all. Thats all there is to it.

http://www.thermalright.com/a_page/main_product_ifx14.htm

So dont tell me anymore the ultra120 is the king. ITS NOT.

Hmmm......my QX6700 at 3GHz at 1.25Vcore using 4x Prime95 scores 54C under load using a Titan Amanda which is basically the same as a Vigoor Monsoon II. What you say is true but you're forgetting most people don't want to reach 4GHz hence all this about the QX6700 producing too much heat is unecessary. It's also a downvolted 89W TEC rather than a 60W.

You don't have to help others over at any other forum as it's not your job by definition and involves no financial bounty, it's purely your choice to help others. If it makes you tiresome then so be it, you will never educate everyone but the best you can do is by making the most amount of sticky's in relevant forums about TEC's so others can go and read about it.
 

aigomorla

CPU, Cases&Cooling Mod PC Gaming Mod Elite Member
Super Moderator
Sep 28, 2005
21,019
3,490
126
Originally posted by: GFORCE100
Originally posted by: aigomorla
Originally posted by: Muhadib
The Thermalright Ultra 120 Extreme is the best air cooling you can get. If have money to burn then spend $150 on a peltier sink like the Vigor Monsoon II. The performance surely does not justify the price, not to mention the extra power needed to fule the peltier portion of the rig.

NO THIS DOES NOT WORK.

WHY WONT YOU PEOPLE LEARN WHAT TEC's REALLY ARE?!?!!?

IM SO FED UP WITH PEOPLE PRETENDING TO KNOW WHAT A TEC IS AND RECOMENDING CRAPPY AIR TEC SOLUTIONS LIKE THE MONSOON. THIS IS EXACTLY WHY THIS KIND OF POST NEEDS TO BE IN TEH CASE AND COOLING SECTION.

Sorry for typing caps, but it really pisses me off that people are recomending things like the monsoon. You start talking about monsoon over at XS forums, and THEY will seriously LAUGH at your face. Honestly did you read my post above? i said these things are KNOWN to overexceed 226W tec, and you think a Monsoon with a DOWNVOLTED 60W TEC can handle it?

XS Forums ultimate guide to TEC's

READ it. Learn from it. If your going to TEC, you need to master water. If you want a crappy toy TEC like the monsoon or classes like that, then GET A IFX-14 By thermalright. THATS THERE NEW KING. NO ITS NOT THE ULTRA 120, its the IFX-14. AND THAT WILL PWN the monsoon vigor. No contest, game over.

SO GET IT RIGHT. People recomending crappy stuff like this only brings more problems to guys like me over at the case and cooling forum. Because WE have to help fix it.

So no dont recomend crappy stuff like that tec product, or even a zalman waterkit, or koolance, or thermalcrap.

Either you cool a QX down properly, or you dont OC at all. Thats all there is to it.

http://www.thermalright.com/a_page/main_product_ifx14.htm

So dont tell me anymore the ultra120 is the king. ITS NOT.

Hmmm......my QX6700 at 3GHz at 1.25Vcore using 4x Prime95 scores 54C under load using a Titan Amanda which is basically the same as a Vigoor Monsoon II. What you say is true but you're forgetting most people don't want to reach 4GHz hence all this about the QX6700 producing too much heat is unecessary. It's also a downvolted 89W TEC rather than a 60W.

You don't have to help others over at any other forum as it's not your job by definition and involves no financial bounty, it's purely your choice to help others. If it makes you tiresome then so be it, you will never educate everyone but the best you can do is by making the most amount of sticky's in relevant forums about TEC's so others can go and read about it.

ahahaha... your right, and i applogize for being a bit estatic.

Its just ive had in the past 2 months, 4 comments from members wanting to tweek there vigor monsoonII.

Now, your running 1.25V so your near stock voltage. So yes, that setup will perform better then stock, however, even if you were to view anandtech's review, you can clearly see the vigor overshaddowing the tuniq tower in performance.

That alone should tell you about the product in terms of performance. How the editor managed to squeeze 200mhz higher, i have no clue.... in fact no one at XS Forum has an idea on how. The temps correlate with a tuniq, yet he got a better overclock.

http://www.anandtech.com/casecooling/showdoc.aspx?i=2921&p=5

I also said, if your going to oc on air, keep the QX below 1.4V which you did. And you probably know first hand what happens when you push the voltage to 1.3 -> 1.4 -> 1.45

The QX as i mentioned is 2 C2D's stamped next to each other. This means both dies will heat up. Here better to explain it would be a quote from techreport:

The E6700's thermal rating, or TDP, is 65W, while the X6800's is 75W. Fittingly, the QX6700's TDP is exactly twice that of the E6700 at 130W.


Now thats 2 C2D's your trying to cool there. Highly Overclocked, would even put my water to its knees. Also why i said they are known to exceed 226W tec's.

Remember a TEC should have roughly 2x the wattage output a CPU can. That is the proper way to use TECs. And if you do the match, a E6600, at 1.4V can put out almost 121W. Now you throw that in a QX... a rough conversion comes out to close to 242W.

WOOPS, you just overshot your TEC.



So, if your going to get a QX, you need the best form of cooling you can get. If air is your limit, i highly suggest you take a close look at thermalarights IFX-14. But i promise you, that thing will still heat up.

If you want to cool that chip down, so you can unleash it, water, or sub ambient is the only form to go.
 

Muhadib

Member
Jan 11, 2005
168
0
0
The reviews on the Monsoon II looked close to the Ultra 120 Extreme for performance but it sounds like peltier and heatsink solutions need to be well planned out for the amount of heat.

Does anybody have a IFX-14 review or a place to purchase it or even a guess on the price? Jab-tech says they will have the IFX-14 around the 3rd week of April so I'm guessing it's not even out yet. Strange that ?It?s the best? but nobody knows why yet. I?m sure Thermalright won?t get away with marketing a product to be superior without it being so, but I don?t plan on relying on marketing to make my choices for me.
 

aigomorla

CPU, Cases&Cooling Mod PC Gaming Mod Elite Member
Super Moderator
Sep 28, 2005
21,019
3,490
126
Originally posted by: Muhadib
The reviews on the Monsoon II looked close to the Ultra 120 Extreme for performance but it sounds like peltier and heatsink solutions need to be well planned out for the amount of heat.

Does anybody have a IFX-14 review or a place to purchase it or even a guess on the price? Jab-tech says they will have the IFX-14 around the 3rd week of April so I'm guessing it's not even out yet. Strange that ?It?s the best? but nobody knows why yet. I?m sure Thermalright won?t get away with marketing a product to be superior without it being so, but I don?t plan on relying on marketing to make my choices for me.

just look at its design. Its bascially 2 120's smashed together.

Just looking at it from a phsyics standpoint, we can assume it wont perform double the 120. But it should perform better then there ultra 120.

Since the Ultra120 is near the top, and this product apears physically it can do better, it has to be the king.

Only downside is the massive weight this monster comes in.


Personally, if it was a QX, and you dropped 1000 dollars on a chip, i would be looking to watercool it. Every 10C you drop your esentially double the life of your chip.

Dont quote me on that tho, im mearly quoting what was mentioned on overclocking.net somewhere i read.

Also i think all Extreme Edition processors should be babied. In my case, if i do decide to go QX6700 again... highly doubt it, and most likely get a Q6600, i will be using a 437W TEC to see what she can really do.

4.0ghz quadcore sound good to anyone??? it does to me
 

yacoub

Golden Member
May 24, 2005
1,991
14
81
just look at its design. Its bascially 2 120's smashed together.

Just looking at it from a phsyics standpoint, we can assume it wont perform double the 120. But it should perform better then there ultra 120.

Since the Ultra120 is near the top, and this product apears physically it can do better, it has to be the king.

What a horrible horrible argument. Sheer conjecture. Let's see some actual benchmarks before we claim it's better than an Ultra 120 Extreme, please.
 

aigomorla

CPU, Cases&Cooling Mod PC Gaming Mod Elite Member
Super Moderator
Sep 28, 2005
21,019
3,490
126
Originally posted by: yacoub
just look at its design. Its bascially 2 120's smashed together.

Just looking at it from a phsyics standpoint, we can assume it wont perform double the 120. But it should perform better then there ultra 120.

Since the Ultra120 is near the top, and this product apears physically it can do better, it has to be the king.

What a horrible horrible argument. Sheer conjecture. Let's see some actual benchmarks before we claim it's better than an Ultra 120 Extreme, please.

Fair enough... If im wrong, i shall admit myself being wrong.

But according to all the aircooling experts over at case and cooling forum, they all state this will be the best.

So im mearly quoting what a pro in air said over at case and cooling.
 
sale-70-410-exam    | Exam-200-125-pdf    | we-sale-70-410-exam    | hot-sale-70-410-exam    | Latest-exam-700-603-Dumps    | Dumps-98-363-exams-date    | Certs-200-125-date    | Dumps-300-075-exams-date    | hot-sale-book-C8010-726-book    | Hot-Sale-200-310-Exam    | Exam-Description-200-310-dumps?    | hot-sale-book-200-125-book    | Latest-Updated-300-209-Exam    | Dumps-210-260-exams-date    | Download-200-125-Exam-PDF    | Exam-Description-300-101-dumps    | Certs-300-101-date    | Hot-Sale-300-075-Exam    | Latest-exam-200-125-Dumps    | Exam-Description-200-125-dumps    | Latest-Updated-300-075-Exam    | hot-sale-book-210-260-book    | Dumps-200-901-exams-date    | Certs-200-901-date    | Latest-exam-1Z0-062-Dumps    | Hot-Sale-1Z0-062-Exam    | Certs-CSSLP-date    | 100%-Pass-70-383-Exams    | Latest-JN0-360-real-exam-questions    | 100%-Pass-4A0-100-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-300-135-exams-date    | Passed-200-105-Tech-Exams    | Latest-Updated-200-310-Exam    | Download-300-070-Exam-PDF    | Hot-Sale-JN0-360-Exam    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Exams    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-JN0-360-exams-date    | Exam-Description-1Z0-876-dumps    | Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps    | Dumps-HPE0-Y53-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-HPE0-Y53-Exam    | 100%-Pass-HPE0-Y53-Real-Exam-Questions    | Pass-4A0-100-Exam    | Latest-4A0-100-Questions    | Dumps-98-365-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-98-365-Exam    | 100%-Pass-VCS-254-Exams    | 2017-Latest-VCS-273-Exam    | Dumps-200-355-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-300-320-Exam    | Pass-300-101-Exam    | 100%-Pass-300-115-Exams    |
http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    | http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    |