Ranting about antiwar protests

[SlowSS]

I say let them protest. It's their right.

Just remember this...

The protestors are THE MINORITY. That's why they protest.

If the majority thought the way they did, there wouldn't be a need to try and be seen in a protest.

Let them do their little protest. The world will keep spinning, and SUPPORTERS, HOUSERS, FEEDERS,

AND FUNDERS of terrorism will continue to be dealt with in the order our country's leaders see fit,

as long as MAJORITY approve the actions.

 

[BadNewsBears]

Ultimatebob. As if they dont. They may have few WMD but they do. I dont have proof but I can gaurantee it. (oxymoron?) They have like 20 of those converted jets made into unmanded chemical sprayers...Wonder what those will be used for, and what they have that will fill the tanks of them.... :disgust: They have ahad like 8 years to hide all that stuff, as if they would leave it anywhere we could find it, or leave it anywhere we even know about. Im just waiting for bush to write the speech that goes on that first bomb and the Iraqi's to play "Hot Saddam" or "Hide The Saddam"... I wasnt pro war until I saw those plane pictures. Il look for the link. f@cktard saddam the usa is comin to pwn your ass!

 

[WinkOsmosis]

Originally posted by: Red Dawn

but i think the same applies to the other side doesnt it?

Personally the only time I pay attention to them is one of you nut cases get's all hot and bothered by them exercising their right to Freedom of Speech. Most of the time their arguments are about as incomprehensible as yours which makes what they have to say hard to take seriously. Then again there are arguments agianst the action that Bush's Administration is planning on taking that do raise some valid concerns. I need all the information I can get regarding this situation so I can make an informed decision and I'm not about to give up that right to appease the "My Country Right or Wrong" Buffoons out there like you.

Heh I agree. There are stupid anti war arguments like "It's for oil". That's as stupid an argument as I've ever heard. That's why I avoid anti war protests and yet hate hawks. On Sep 11th, 2001, I predicted that America would go to hell with blind patriotism, and I was right. What a world we live in.

 

[BadNewsBears]

Here is one link will find more CNN

Another Secret weapon?!?!


EDIT

Another HERE

Google is your friend.

Still looking for the pic. If anyone sees it, theres hangars on each side and prob 10-20 planes in / out of the hangar

 

[Red Dawn]

They have like 20 of those converted jets made into unmanded chemical sprayers...

You mean un-manned? What type of jet is that? Hell they don't have enough spare parts for the planes they have now I would be amazed if they were able to convert them into Un Manned Drones capable of dispensing Chemical or Biological Weapons.

BTW, having planes equiped to spray chemical weapons is nothing new to them. They used them against the Kurds and the Shiite Population right after the Gulf War while our forces sat by and did nothing under orders from our Commander and Chief at the time George Bush.

 

[BadNewsBears]

Look at post one above yours. Maybe I exagerated with 10 but they have a few of thos un-maned ( un-maned)

 

[BadNewsBears]

I dont nececarily agree with this but here......... Hmmmm

 

[Red Dawn]

Originally posted by: Munchies
I dont nececarily agree with this but here......... Hmmmm

Tom is the editor and publisher of Conservative Truth, an email newsletter read by tens of thousands weekly which focuses on moral and political issues from a Biblical viewpoint.

He's a Christian Version of an Islamic Fundamentalist.

 

[SlowSS]

Originally posted by: Red Dawn

They have like 20 of those converted jets made into unmanded chemical sprayers...

You mean un-manned? What type of jet is that? Hell they don't have enough spare parts for the planes they have now I would be amazed if they were able to convert them into Un Manned Drones capable of dispensing Chemical or Biological Weapons.

BTW, having planes equiped to spray chemical weapons is nothing new to them. They used them against the Kurds and the Shiite Population right after the Gulf War while our forces sat by and did nothing under orders from our Commander and Chief at the time George Bush.

The proper terminology is Unmanned.

And no, Iraq do not possess any Umanned aircraft or drones.

And you could thank UN for allowing Saddam stay on as a dictator to massacre of Kurds and Shias.

Did anyother countries intervene and stop Saddam from massacring the Kurds and the shias?

 

[BadNewsBears]

Excerpt from a somewhat crude and racist sit that is somewhat offtopic but anyhow...

Every hole in Afghanistan large enough to fit an air-to-surface missile was targeted with three missiles, mined, and showcased on Headline News. There's no way Osama bin Laden could be alive. It's impossible. End of story.
Why are we wasting CIA officials on every crank-call tape that circulates in the Middle East? Let's put Pauly Shore on this case; he needs to eat. He can make a party movie about a wacky bunch of college dropouts and pot-heads who spend spring break at the Grand Canyon. They send a fake memo to the Phoenix FBI office and get in trouble. Donald Rumsfeld has a cameo as the crusty dean who won't let these kids have the fun they want.

Anyhow, my point's been made. Osama bin Laden is old news. Maybe if he made a threatening reference to J. Lo and B. Aff's wedding, he'd be worth nuking Afghanistan into glass over. As it is, our daisy-cutters are earmarked for someone else.

SIte=racist but here Here

 

[BadNewsBears]

Ill find even more unmanned links. Im positive there was proof. I thinkit was even declared in that 12,000 page of weapon declaration crap...

Red I dont agree at all really. I dunno who he is even

 

[SlowSS]

Originally posted by: Munchies
Excerpt from a somewhat crude and racist sit that is somewhat offtopic but anyhow...

Every hole in Afghanistan large enough to fit an air-to-surface missile was targeted with three missiles, mined, and showcased on Headline News. There's no way Osama bin Laden could be alive. It's impossible. End of story.
Why are we wasting CIA officials on every crank-call tape that circulates in the Middle East? Let's put Pauly Shore on this case; he needs to eat. He can make a party movie about a wacky bunch of college dropouts and pot-heads who spend spring break at the Grand Canyon. They send a fake memo to the Phoenix FBI office and get in trouble. Donald Rumsfeld has a cameo as the crusty dean who won't let these kids have the fun they want.

Anyhow, my point's been made. Osama bin Laden is old news. Maybe if he made a threatening reference to J. Lo and B. Aff's wedding, he'd be worth nuking Afghanistan into glass over. As it is, our daisy-cutters are earmarked for someone else.

SIte=racist but here Here

Sorry but racist sites loses all of my respect and credibility even if we argree with certain issues.:disgust:

 

[PCMarine]

I agree. People in this country need to learn that freedom ISN'T free.

 

[nakedfrog]

Even if they DO have unmanned jets with biological warfare sprayers, do they have aircraft carriers?
No?
Do they have in-flight refueling capability?
I would wager not.
So how exactly would those planes be able to get all the way to the US and spray the general populace?

[edit]
And as far as the whole "Freedom isn't free" and the idea of forced military service, it's not a good idea for more than one reason.
First of all, if you're conscripted into the armed forces as soon as you reach the age of 18, how is that freedom?
Second, a vast majority would presumably not stay in, as they would probably like to get on with college, work, or whatever was going on in their life before.
This is bad because the people serving longer terms would constantly be training a rotating crop of troops. Thus, waste.
We also simply don't NEED an army that large, the armed forces are actually meeting their set recruiting rate. It was declining for a few years, but the patriotism spurred by 9/11 shored up the numbers.

 

[lemcc]

this is my 11th year in the military and i fully support the anti-war
protest and if time premits would like to show my support

the man who fights for peace loves it the most

has for the pro-war people in this country please have your counter protests

i support their right to assemble but i would like to attend has well so you can all sign up for a little military service

BlueEyedBeezlebub i would assume you are not already a member of our armed forces your IQ no doubt the disqualifying factor

 

[BadNewsBears]

Nakedfrog I didnt say anything bout the US if we dont stop saddam before he does something dumb agian Kurd Shiite massacres, who is. Are you willing to let those people die becouse of an evil regime??

 

[nakedfrog]

Originally posted by: Munchies
Nakedfrog I didnt say anything bout the US if we dont stop saddam before he does something dumb agian Kurd Shiite massacres, who is. Are you willing to let those people die becouse of an evil regime??

Me? I'm not certain the decision is up to me.

What did it take before the US entered WWII? How many people had to die?

Remember, many of the people in that region of the world consider us to be an evil regime.

 

[SlowSS]

Originally posted by: nakedfrog
Even if they DO have unmanned jets with biological warfare sprayers, do they have aircraft carriers?
No?
Do they have in-flight refueling capability?
I would wager not.
So how exactly would those planes be able to get all the way to the US and spray the general populace?

I worked with Unmanned Combat Air Vehicle (UCAV-N) program and In-Flight Refueling (IFR) isn't too hard to incorporate onto UAV/UCAV.

The biggest challenge is the actually refueling itself. It is very difficult to perform IFR due to UAV/UCAV's inability to make
small adjustments during IFR especially with air turbulence. BTW, with all the available information that I have on worldwide UAV/UCAV programs,
I could honestly say Iraq do not possess any Unmanned Air Vehicle.

 

[BadNewsBears]

I didnt say that was a good decision...
How many MORE have to die this time???

Edit
You know what im hawking.Im shocked at my self. Im a conservative more than anything. But I really think that this saddam BS has GOT to end. Im we dont I believe it will be a mistake on our part if we dont do something relatively soon. I dont mean tomorrow. But lets ride this out another few months. ..










To assemble our troops

 

[flavio]

Originally posted by: SlowSS
I say let them protest. It's their right.

Just remember this...

The protestors are THE MINORITY. That's why they protest.

If the majority thought the way they did, there wouldn't be a need to try and be seen in a protest.

Let them do their little protest. The world will keep spinning, and SUPPORTERS, HOUSERS, FEEDERS,

AND FUNDERS of terrorism will continue to be dealt with in the order our country's leaders see fit,

as long as MAJORITY approve the actions.

Only 40% of the country supports war without UN support. I believe a good many of those would support war on Switzerland if Bush decided to attack them.

There seems to be a growing mass growing mass that are opening their eyes though.

 

[etech]

Iraq did have an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) program designed to deliver chemical or biological weapons. What state it is in right now I do not know.

 

[UltraQuiet]

I believe a good many of those would support war on Switzerland if Bush decided to attack them.

There seems to be a growing mass growing mass that are opening their eyes though.

Yes and I believe a good many people, including you, would say Bush was fscked up if he said the world was round and the sky was blue. About 99% of what I hear these "protestors" say is pure emotional drivel. "War monger", "Oil for his friends", "Personal vendetta" is just so much unsubstantiated crap. If they want a majority of people to take them serious they better come up with something better.

 

[sandorski]

Originally posted by: SlowSS

Originally posted by: nakedfrog
Even if they DO have unmanned jets with biological warfare sprayers, do they have aircraft carriers?
No?
Do they have in-flight refueling capability?
I would wager not.
So how exactly would those planes be able to get all the way to the US and spray the general populace?

I worked with Unmanned Combat Air Vehicle (UCAV-N) program and In-Flight Refueling (IFR) isn't too hard to incorporate onto UAV/UCAV.

The biggest challenge is the actually refueling itself. It is very difficult to perform IFR due to UAV/UCAV's inability to make
small adjustments during IFR especially with air turbulence. BTW, with all the available information that I have on worldwide UAV/UCAV programs,
I could honestly say Iraq do not possess any Unmanned Air Vehicle.

The difficulty of In-Flight refueling may not be that difficult(I dunno, never having the experience), but one would still need some kind of Base(likely many due to the distance) or an Aircraft Carrier in order to reach from Iraq to the US

 

[flavio]

Originally posted by: DaveSohmer

I believe a good many of those would support war on Switzerland if Bush decided to attack them.

There seems to be a growing mass growing mass that are opening their eyes though.

Yes and I believe a good many people, including you, would say Bush was fscked up if he said the world was round and the sky was blue. About 99% of what I hear these "protestors" say is pure emotional drivel. "War monger", "Oil for his friends", "Personal vendetta" is just so much unsubstantiated crap. If they want a majority of people to take them serious they better come up with something better.

Well, you're wrong about me and I think most of these others as well. People don't go out in and gather in gigantic protests whenever Bush makes a poor decision.

...and what "Majority" are you talking about? The 40%?

 

[UltraQuiet]

Originally posted by: flavio

Originally posted by: DaveSohmer

I believe a good many of those would support war on Switzerland if Bush decided to attack them.

There seems to be a growing mass growing mass that are opening their eyes though.

Yes and I believe a good many people, including you, would say Bush was fscked up if he said the world was round and the sky was blue. About 99% of what I hear these "protestors" say is pure emotional drivel. "War monger", "Oil for his friends", "Personal vendetta" is just so much unsubstantiated crap. If they want a majority of people to take them serious they better come up with something better.

Well, you're wrong about me and I think most of these others as well. People don't go out in and gather in gigantic protests whenever Bush makes a poor decision.

...and what "Majority" are you talking about? The 40%?

Well based on what I 've seen you post here and listening to the "protestors" I don't think I'm wrong at all. As far as these gigiantic protests go, 200,000 in a country of 280 million doesn't really impress me all that much and hardly qualifies as gigantic.