- Mar 28, 2004
- 7,613
- 3
- 0
Originally posted by: Journer
i HATE razr's...but then again i hate most of the phones people have...ive had sooooo many motos and sooooo many motos crap out on me :/ if you're a girl...razr is nice because it fits easily into tight pants...i suppose if you're a male with tight pants that works too...but anytime i see a guy with razr it screams 'gay' but people prolly see my blackberry as 'old' ...oh well, to each his own
Originally posted by: Journer
i HATE razr's...but then again i hate most of the phones people have...ive had sooooo many motos and sooooo many motos crap out on me :/ if you're a girl...razr is nice because it fits easily into tight pants...i suppose if you're a male with tight pants that works too...but anytime i see a guy with razr it screams 'gay' but people prolly see my blackberry as 'old' ...oh well, to each his own
Originally posted by: LegendKiller
2GB card + Sprint PPC6700 = much better than RAZR
Originally posted by: TallBill
Originally posted by: LegendKiller
2GB card + Sprint PPC6700 = much better than RAZR
Last time that I checked, I only use my phone to call people... so my POS4000 crap ass phone works just fine. Anything more is stupid.
Originally posted by: DLeRium
Originally posted by: TallBill
Originally posted by: LegendKiller
2GB card + Sprint PPC6700 = much better than RAZR
Last time that I checked, I only use my phone to call people... so my POS4000 crap ass phone works just fine. Anything more is stupid.
Well most people here post on forums so all you need is a Pentium II 266 mhz. Agreed? Oh no, you don't agree.
So shut up.
Just because you don't know jack sh!t about cell phones doesn't mean badass phones are stupid. You're the equivalent of people who buy Dell and HP prebuilt PCs.... You can only get so much with a branded phones.
iPods are actually good. Show me something that small and so functional. What does the competition offer that is better? Mmmm not much. iPods and their competitors have technology that are on the same generation.
RaZr is about 3 generations behind in technology. VGA camera phone? LoL. Let's see. I went from V600 (same as a Razr w/ VGA) to a K700 (roughly the 1.3 MP period), to a K750i (2MP camera generation), and hopefully a K800 in the next month or so (3MP).
It's technology 2 years old.. likea fvcking Athlon XP Barton. If you think your RaZr makes you look cool, then please show off your Barton system too, because they are both worthless...
Originally posted by: TallBill
Originally posted by: DLeRium
Originally posted by: TallBill
Originally posted by: LegendKiller
2GB card + Sprint PPC6700 = much better than RAZR
Last time that I checked, I only use my phone to call people... so my POS4000 crap ass phone works just fine. Anything more is stupid.
Well most people here post on forums so all you need is a Pentium II 266 mhz. Agreed? Oh no, you don't agree.
So shut up.
Just because you don't know jack sh!t about cell phones doesn't mean badass phones are stupid. You're the equivalent of people who buy Dell and HP prebuilt PCs.... You can only get so much with a branded phones.
iPods are actually good. Show me something that small and so functional. What does the competition offer that is better? Mmmm not much. iPods and their competitors have technology that are on the same generation.
RaZr is about 3 generations behind in technology. VGA camera phone? LoL. Let's see. I went from V600 (same as a Razr w/ VGA) to a K700 (roughly the 1.3 MP period), to a K750i (2MP camera generation), and hopefully a K800 in the next month or so (3MP).
It's technology 2 years old.. likea fvcking Athlon XP Barton. If you think your RaZr makes you look cool, then please show off your Barton system too, because they are both worthless...
That arguement is 100% inaccurate. The only factor that matters in a cell phone is how well it holds a call. A slow computer will not be anywhere near as productive for posting on these forums. Whereas an old cell phone works just fine.
You are a complete and total moron if you think a phone is badass. (unless it can blow you). Nobody is cool because of what phone they have.
Originally posted by: Xyclone
The RAZR V3c owns the V3. Please don't say "omg razr 0.3 megapikselz all razrs suck lawl," Delerium. Do some research on the better RAZR's out there.
Originally posted by: TallBill
Originally posted by: DLeRium
Originally posted by: TallBill
Originally posted by: LegendKiller
2GB card + Sprint PPC6700 = much better than RAZR
Last time that I checked, I only use my phone to call people... so my POS4000 crap ass phone works just fine. Anything more is stupid.
Well most people here post on forums so all you need is a Pentium II 266 mhz. Agreed? Oh no, you don't agree.
So shut up.
Just because you don't know jack sh!t about cell phones doesn't mean badass phones are stupid. You're the equivalent of people who buy Dell and HP prebuilt PCs.... You can only get so much with a branded phones.
iPods are actually good. Show me something that small and so functional. What does the competition offer that is better? Mmmm not much. iPods and their competitors have technology that are on the same generation.
RaZr is about 3 generations behind in technology. VGA camera phone? LoL. Let's see. I went from V600 (same as a Razr w/ VGA) to a K700 (roughly the 1.3 MP period), to a K750i (2MP camera generation), and hopefully a K800 in the next month or so (3MP).
It's technology 2 years old.. likea fvcking Athlon XP Barton. If you think your RaZr makes you look cool, then please show off your Barton system too, because they are both worthless...
That arguement is 100% inaccurate. The only factor that matters in a cell phone is how well it holds a call. A slow computer will not be anywhere near as productive for posting on these forums. Whereas an old cell phone works just fine.
You are a complete and total moron if you think a phone is badass. (unless it can blow you). Nobody is cool because of what phone they have.
Originally posted by: DLeRium
Well just because you like sporting your Motorola Startac phone from the 90s doesn't mean you need to tell everyone not to get good phones, nor does it mean good phones don't matter.
You are speaking from the perspective of someone who uses their computer to check email everyday only. Sure they may think no one needs a dual core Opteron system with 2GB of ram, but it doesn't make us system enthusiasts idiots.
You could say that cars are for driving from A to B, so why would you need to do 0 to 60 in 5.3 seconds? Your arguments about cell phones can be used with cars and what would car enthusiasts say? Do you think they are stupid too?
Originally posted by: TallBill
Originally posted by: DLeRium
Well just because you like sporting your Motorola Startac phone from the 90s doesn't mean you need to tell everyone not to get good phones, nor does it mean good phones don't matter.
You are speaking from the perspective of someone who uses their computer to check email everyday only. Sure they may think no one needs a dual core Opteron system with 2GB of ram, but it doesn't make us system enthusiasts idiots.
You could say that cars are for driving from A to B, so why would you need to do 0 to 60 in 5.3 seconds? Your arguments about cell phones can be used with cars and what would car enthusiasts say? Do you think they are stupid too?
My phone is actually fairly recent. Bought it new in 2005. I couldn't even begin to guess at what make/model it is.
And if someone uses a computer for email, then no they dont need that system, however computers were never intended to do just email, unlike the sole purpose of a phone. Personally I game with mine, so I can justify it as an entertainment cost.
But the bells and whistles on cell phones are pointless.
And as far as cars go, I 100% agree that they are only a method of transportation, however I would not call a car enthusiast stupid. I think that anyone that works on a car, or improves their car to bring to a track, or rebuilds cars can be truly talented. But thats called a hobby, or once again entertainment. But people that spend $30k on a brand new car, just to drive to work boggle my mind, regardless of how much money they make.
Originally posted by: DLeRium
I mean yes it does seem intrusive that the cell phone is blending in with 10 other devices. I guess it's hard to accept at first, but it takes time torealize that it's more beneficial to have an all-in-one device.
Is my K750 my main camera? No. I do photography and I have my own camera, but I can't stuff it all into my pocket. When I went snowboarding, all I had to do was stick my cell into one pocket and I could pull it out anytime to snap a picture.
Sure my K750i is no iPod, but I don't need to carry my larger iPod and my cell when I can just stick to listening to my cell phone wtih MP3s. If I get tired, I switch to radio. How simple. Alarm clock? I don't even have one. My cell phone is my alarm clock.
Cell phones migh tnot replace ipods overnight, but they are sure handy. I still use both, but I can't say I'm not happy because there are walkman phones out there..
Originally posted by: state 08
I have to agree with DLeRium. Having a cell phone with a 100 other features isn't stupid. You're mentality is wrong. In this day in age, you can't be thinking "basic" is best. That'll get you no where. If everyone thought the way you did, and just assumed that their old technology is good enough since it works, then we'd be pretty far behind technologically.
Originally posted by: Goosemaster
RAZR + BERRIES + MILK - MILK = :heart: