- Oct 11, 1999
- 23,578
- 1
- 0
First of all, I'm basing this on my religious experience of the LDS faith. I don't know what the other religion's stand on the topic of swearing is, but I ASSUME it's frowned upon.
Other assumptions:
-There is a "god"
-"god" is omnipotent
-There is a "heaven"/"hell"
-a cuss word is really more than a word (I don't think so)
Anyway, onto the question. Why do people believe that substituting cuss words circumvents the "You're not supposed to swear" edict?.....e.g. crap vs. sh!t, fetch vs. fvck, etc...
I don't think it does. Here's my reasoning:
You are thinking the word you are avoiding saying, right? If "god" is omnipotent, he knows your thoughts, as well as your intentions. If this is true, and swearing sends you to "hell"(maybe, I don't know the punishment ), then even using the "clean" cuss words wouldn't make a difference, eh?
WTF?
amish
<edit>I'm not saying swearing is good or bad. I just find it funny that people think they are avoiding "god's" wrath by substituting words while holding the same intentions. </edit>
Other assumptions:
-There is a "god"
-"god" is omnipotent
-There is a "heaven"/"hell"
-a cuss word is really more than a word (I don't think so)
Anyway, onto the question. Why do people believe that substituting cuss words circumvents the "You're not supposed to swear" edict?.....e.g. crap vs. sh!t, fetch vs. fvck, etc...
I don't think it does. Here's my reasoning:
You are thinking the word you are avoiding saying, right? If "god" is omnipotent, he knows your thoughts, as well as your intentions. If this is true, and swearing sends you to "hell"(maybe, I don't know the punishment ), then even using the "clean" cuss words wouldn't make a difference, eh?
WTF?
amish
<edit>I'm not saying swearing is good or bad. I just find it funny that people think they are avoiding "god's" wrath by substituting words while holding the same intentions. </edit>