Here are just three remarks/comments:
"ATI hasn?t yet managed to overwhelm the market with their RADEON X800 XT solutions, which are the direct competitor to NVIDIA?s best selling expensive graphics solution today ? GeForce 6800 GT."
This is just a minor thing, but actually 6800 GT is positioned against X800 Pro.
"We selected the maximum possible graphics quality settings in each application ? the same for cards on GPUs from ATI and NVIDIA (we disabled the Anisotropic mip sample optimization for NVIDIA?s GPUs)."
It is unclear. What about driver settings for ATI cards and Nvidia cards? It should be thoroughly specified. It would add credibility to the review.
"Aces in the Sky requires a high texturing speed as well as fast execution of pixel shaders. The GeForce 6800 GT is better in the first parameter, but the RADEON X800 XT and X850 XT PE are superior in the second. As a result, NVIDIA?s card is slightly ahead of the ATI cards, but the increased frequencies of the RADEON X850 XT Platinum Edition help it to keep on about the same performance level."
Forgive me, but this is not correct. Geforce 6800 GT has much lower texture rate than both X800XT and X850XT, however, its executes most of shaders quite a lot faster (per clock) than both Radeons. It is not the first time I saw such a comment in graphics reviews on Xbitlabs and I can draw only two conclusions:
1. You lack certain knowledge (I doubt it).
2. You are just ignorant.
Just my three cents.