Please clarify your reasoning as to why BB10 is not any good.
The number one reason why BB10 sucks is because it doesn't exist. I don't care how good the interface supposedly is. I don't care if it can cure cancer and end world hunger. None of that means anything, because
it doesn't exist. Anything that anyone says about BB10 is pure speculation at this point, particularly given the fact that RIM's attempts at rolling out new product lines haven't always lived up to expectations (Playbook, anyone?).
Meanwhile, the Blackberries that are actually on the market today,
right now, are outclassed by Android and iOS in functionality, performance, app availability, and pretty much every other metric I can think of.
The second reason by BB10 sucks is app support. You claim:
75% of all phone apps are written in HTML5 or partly so. Point is, 75% of smartphone apps can be migrated to BB10 quite easily.
Got a citation for that? I have dozens of apps installed on my Android, and none of them rely on HTML5 for any significant functionality, as far as I can tell.
You also claim:
You do know that BB10 can run many Droid apps correct? There are app omissions such as apps that require GPS APIs. But the process for a developer of a Droid app to get it working on the BB10 is all of a 10 minute process if it is doable. The only thing that RIMM requires is that all references to Droid be removed.
Porting an app to another platform involves more than getting the app to work; there are testing and ongoing support expenses to consider as well. Even if BB10 can run Android apps with absolutely no caveats (which I doubt, you even listed a few), there's no guarantee that it will be able to keep up with newer versions of Android. This leaves developers who choose to support BB10's Android compatibility layer in a position where they constantly need to be mindful of BB10's limitations when developing for Android.
Of course, like anything else with BB10, this is purely a theoretical "what-if" scenario. The much more likely outcome is that BB10 won't be supported by app developers because the market share won't be enough to make such support worthwhile, regardless of how easy it might be. Developers go to where the market is, and that's Android and iOS. Palm and Nokia weren't able to attact a developer ecosystem, and the only reason Microsoft has any app developers is because they've been able to throw giant wads of cash at them, something that RIM isn't in a position to do. In this day and age, a smartphone platform without developer support is DOA; what makes you think BB10 will be any different?
You are saying that RIMM is bleeding cash. Which part of the quarterly and annual reports made you think that?
The part where they recorded a loss of over $500 million and 33% drop in revenue for the quarter, which is a substantially accelerated slide from the previous quarter and worse then even the most pessimistic analyst predictions. Or perhaps where they anticipated even further losses for the current and next quarter.
Perhaps "bleeding cash" was the not the right terminology, but my general point stands: RIM is operating at a loss that is increasing every quarter with no end in sight until at least 2013. RIM only has so much cash on-hand to absorb that loss, and I doubt investors will continue to stomach steep losses for that long. Unless RIM changes its fortunes very quickly (or at the very least, stops bleeding), there's a strong possibility that investors will force a sale or a substantial restructuring before BB10 ever sees the light of day.
PS: Part of the reason that RIMM didn't go to Droid is something called market differentiation.
RIM can use Android as a base platform while still differentiating its offerings, particularly since a large part of the Blackberry "experience" is made up of services. This would allow them to stay on a modern smartphone platform and give them at least partial access to Android's ecosystem. For an example of how this would work, see the Kindle Fire.