TV segment. Hopefully they will have on their site laterLink?
TV segment. Hopefully they will have on their site laterLink?
Fathers have only one time for input, when they engage in sexual intercourse or sperm donation. They have no right of input after that. The choice to carry or not is totally a woman's right. How did you manage to get this wrong, not that I will be successful in convincing you of it?
I want to make sure that you are saying that the Democrats do not do everything in their power to gain and retain control? Just to be clear.
Outside of impeaching a President twice on faked and manipulated "evidence", controlling the vast majority of mass information communication outlets and centers of learning, censoring dissent political views, influencing elections with mass disinformation campaigns and potentially colluding with several different foreign governments and entities, Gerrymandering voting districts via uncontrolled "immigration", coordinating with corrupt domestic terrorist organizations to occupy parts of several cities and enabling a nationwide rioting and arson campaign, and establishing a DOJ agency headed by unelected individuals to judge disinformation just to name a few.
I can see where you are disappointed in the efforts by the Democrats. The Constitution and Democracy hasn't been totally shredded.
No authoritarian Democrat believes that. You have human rights that don't scare them. If you feel threatening look out.Funny, here I thought rights to freedoms per-person were self-evident and implied. Human rights aren't encoded in our constitution, the govt's limits are.
Without clicking ignored post, bet he’s complaining about impeachment and Russian collusion.You don't even pretend to think about any of this critically anymore, you just repeat whatever Tucker Carlson tells you.
I could refute every point you made, it is all laughable easy to do, but why bother? You would just act surprised that you were once again duped and then in two weeks and say it all again.
you do realize both sides gerrymander right? both parties are equally guilty?
"I support the right of fathers to have SOME input" Fathers have no such right beyond the one I mentioned. I read the thread up to your post saying you support them having some.While it may be redundant to actually bother posting this, WT actual F are you talking about?
Read the thread prior to posting and you won't appear nearly as silly.... next time find somebody who actually DISAGREE'S with you to argue with!
Without clicking ignored post, bet he’s complaining about impeachment and Russian collusion.
What if you live in Alaska?
"I support the right of fathers to have SOME input" Fathers have no such right beyond the one I mentioned. I read the thread up to your post saying you support them having some.
Gosh, just the kind of support that would accrue naturally to the better of the two parties at least among people not brainwashed into an alternate reality. Of course, from that alternate reality what you say would seem obvious. Think what you would stand to lose if you were wrong.I want to make sure that you are saying that the Democrats do not do everything in their power to gain and retain control? Just to be clear.
Outside of impeaching a President twice on faked and manipulated "evidence", controlling the vast majority of mass information communication outlets and centers of learning, censoring dissent political views, influencing elections with mass disinformation campaigns and potentially colluding with several different foreign governments and entities, Gerrymandering voting districts via uncontrolled "immigration", coordinating with corrupt domestic terrorist organizations to occupy parts of several cities and enabling a nationwide rioting and arson campaign, and establishing a DOJ agency headed by unelected individuals to judge disinformation just to name a few.
I can see where you are disappointed in the efforts by the Democrats. The Constitution and Democracy hasn't been totally shredded.
Oh the hand wringing. Between Moonpie and Gothewhatever might as well make my plans to move to Belize now.
He has none on whether the woman decides to carry or not. Too bad about being obliged to support. Work that out before having sex. Get a contract guaranteeing she won't abort. Don't cry later.So in your world "SOME input" equals the right to force a woman to carry her child to term?
Really? (this kind of nonsense is why so many here disrespect you)
You genuinely believe that an involved father has ZERO right to even express a valid opinion about having a child that he helped conceive? (AND is obligated to support)
Because that's what I was talking about... your ASS-umption was not correct.
I can't see how anyone can look at this track record of failure and not call for a complete overhaul of the party
Like abortion will reman legal in NM for long.
Fuck authoritarians. Line every fucking one up in front of a firing squad. I'm pretty goddamned sick of it.No authoritarian Democrat believes that. You have human rights that don't scare them. If you feel threatening look out.
I always assume moonie is playing some angle setting up a trap with these things however right here I agree with him. You as the doner of course have a voice, it just doesnt weigh anything… lets get facts straight you’re not an involved father cause you’re not a father yet. Its 100% the woman’s provocative to keep it or not, men should have NO legal standing on the issue at all.So in your world "SOME input" equals the right to force a woman to carry her child to term?
Really? (this kind of nonsense is why so many here disrespect you)
You genuinely believe that an involved father has ZERO right to even express a valid opinion about having a child that he helped conceive? (AND is obligated to support)
Because that's what I was talking about... your ASS-umption was not correct.
EDIT: You are ONE brain-dead post away from joining Brandon BS on my blocked list.
ah, so it dependsIs pregnancy a deadly contagious disease?
interesting non sequiturI'm sure you think the laws forcing you to conceal your dick in public are very unfair.
To be fair that is sort of what they’re trying to do to us, fuck us over. Maybe we should reverse the polarity on the flow of the fucking.Fuck authoritarians. Line every fucking one up in front of a firing squad. I'm pretty goddamned sick of it.
So just start adding Clinton to all their names? Think it's that easy?To be fair that is sort of what they’re trying to do to us, fuck us over. Maybe we should reverse the polarity on the flow of the fucking.
No, Clinton had just cultivated relationships in the Democratic Party for decades, something Sanders failed to do. Turns out
2016 saw a contested primary and Sanders lost fair and square. He lost again in 2020, fair and square. At least in 2020 he learned his lesson and dropped out after it was clear he couldn't win, unlike in 2016.
Assume control of the Q? Maybe…So just start adding Clinton to all their names? Think it's that easy?