Pipeline 1010
Golden Member
- Dec 2, 2005
- 1,973
- 794
- 136
You honestly can't see a little space between "Would you mind putting out your cigarette" and "We're going to give you a body cavity search on the side of the road"?
Both are not lawful commands. Both are the same in that regard. If you can refuse one, you can refuse the other. Either way you support fucking with someone for refusing to obey an unlawful command. I noticed that you have not expressed disagreement with either instance.
Not if the sheep was picking on him. Then the shepherd and the sheep dog have mutton for dinner and the herd IQ creeps up.
Again this was a stupid analogy. Sheep don't pick on sheep dogs. And you don't get to "eat" a sheep if it picks on you. You sound like a violent asshole who thinks murder is the proper response to being "picked on" aka not being obeyed even when the disobedience is to an unlawful order.
Back in the real world (again), this lady didn't pick on him by refusing an unlawful order to extinguish the cigarette. That's not what "picking on" is. Pulling someone over under threat of violent force for moving out of the way without a blinker fully qualifies as "picking on". It is a chickenshit reason to disrupt someone's life.
Just so you know, cops are not sheep dogs; they are human beings who should be expected to follow the law and be professional even if they are being "picked on". Why? Because they are GETTING PAID. What a dick reason for a "sheep dog" to attack the "sheep": "I was picked on". Grow up.