- Sep 19, 2002
- 32
- 0
- 0
Since right now any mobo that has SATA on it still has to go through the PCI bus (basically just a controller card onboard) is it worth it to even put a SATA HD in your system, performance wise, or should you just stick with ATA HD's until a chipset comes out next year with SATA intergrated right into it. For instance Nvidia has been fairly good at working
on their drivers for their nForce2 chipset just as Intel has been for their own chipsets. Might you be better off using those native chipset features over the onboard Serial ATA interface? You can get the WD 80GB HD with 8MB cache and ATA 100, and there are 2 Serial HD's coming out from Maxtor and Seagate that also feature a 8MB cache. Which do you think is better or more worth while?
on their drivers for their nForce2 chipset just as Intel has been for their own chipsets. Might you be better off using those native chipset features over the onboard Serial ATA interface? You can get the WD 80GB HD with 8MB cache and ATA 100, and there are 2 Serial HD's coming out from Maxtor and Seagate that also feature a 8MB cache. Which do you think is better or more worth while?