Originally posted by: M0RPH
I guess we should just all accept the fact that Nvidia has inferior 3D image quality to ATI. It looks like Nvidia thinks that you should accept some shimmering in their default "quality" mode. I just hope reviewers will point this out in the future and let everyone know that while Nvidia cards may be faster, they give you inferior image quality.
Right, because it's so "obvious" none of the reviewers even noticed it.
Should I go in to what we've gotten used to not having on ATI cards. LOL- got a few minutes?
1. No SM3
2. Therefore, no displacement mapping
3. Therefore, no current method geometry instancing
4. No Exr HDR
5. No soft stencil shadows
6. No multicard solution
7. No high end solution
8. No good linux drivers
9. No Transparency AA
10. No 16X AA
But hey, "No having to set the slider from quality to high quality to remove an effect many people can't see and many who can barely notice" is a
fair trade for those ten points, right guys? :roll::wine:
That shimmering issue is a BIG deal because it's about the only thing you have to hang onto while ATI delays their next part over and over, tells stockholders it might not even be better, and hires lawyers to defend themselves against the
six (and climbing) lawsuits for insider trading so the execs could cash out while the getting is good? (a couple months after paying $900,000 in fines for the same thing!)
Yep, ATI is just an honest, hardworking company who deserves your hard earned dollar.
Now remember buyers, it's a choice between:
nVidia- some faint shimmer at mipmap transitions that will be either greatly reduced or totally removed by upcoming drivers
OR
ATI:
1. No SM3
2. Therefore, no displacement mapping
3. Therefore, no current method geometry instancing
4. No Exr HDR
5. No soft stencil shadows
6. No multicard solution
7. No high end solution
8. No good linux drivers
9. No Transparency AA
10. No 16X AA
You can use your call to a friend if you need help with this
tough choice!
LOL