You're comparing this movie to Into Darkness? When all we have of this movie is a couple minute trailer, and Into Darkness has been out for how long? Good lord people, just stop. Give the damn thing a chance.
Executive producer. That's practically an honorary title.I'm not a big fan of the reboot either. I'm fine with it, but not a big fan. I thought the first JJ one was not bad, and I thought the second JJ one was not bad. Actually, I've pretty much forgotten what the second one was about. I remember the plot of the first one, but thought the plot was kinda stupid in many areas. It was mostly stuff other than the main plot that saved the movie IMO.
He's a producer actually.
Beastie Boys plus Star Trek just does not compute. Prolly catch it on video just for laughs.
Oh, yeah, I had forgotten about that. Still doesn't work for me, though.Well, that's actually from the first movie when Kirk was a kid....it works in the trailer, but it went on way too long. should have just been a short clip.
2Fast 2Trek.
(Stolen from elsewhere)
About the only good part of JJ trek is Karl Urbans Bones McCoy.
Interesting interview with Lin. New one ignores Into Darkness story.
Like most people, director Justin Lin is well aware of the problems the last Star Trek movie, Into Darkness, faced and has come up with a way to combat those issues with his new film, Star Trek Beyond.
Talking to Birth. Movies. Death., Lin confirmed that he'll be "politely ignoring" all of the events that happened in the last movie, helmed by J.J. Abrams, and will restart the franchise with a whole new feel.
Lin said that while he wouldn't discount what happened, he wasn't going to embrace anything that Abrams did in the last film, but did take a second to acknowledge just how grateful he was to the director for creating the series.
"I embraced what J.J. has brought without him this whole group wouldn't be together so I'm definitely very appreciative of him," Lin said.
Lin added some more details about the upcoming film, including the fact that Beyond will take place two and a half years after Into Darkness, meaning that the USS Enterprise crew will be halfway done their five year mission.
So basically the new reboot series is so incomprehensible that the second one is already necessitating a major retcon in the third?
Interesting interview with Lin. New one ignores Into Darkness story.
Like most people, director Justin Lin is well aware of the problems the last Star Trek movie, Into Darkness, faced and has come up with a way to combat those issues with his new film, Star Trek Beyond.
Talking to Birth. Movies. Death., Lin confirmed that he'll be "politely ignoring" all of the events that happened in the last movie, helmed by J.J. Abrams, and will restart the franchise with a whole new feel.
Lin said that while he wouldn't discount what happened, he wasn't going to embrace anything that Abrams did in the last film, but did take a second to acknowledge just how grateful he was to the director for creating the series.
"I embraced what J.J. has brought without him this whole group wouldn't be together so I'm definitely very appreciative of him," Lin said.
Lin added some more details about the upcoming film, including the fact that Beyond will take place two and a half years after Into Darkness, meaning that the USS Enterprise crew will be halfway done their five year mission.
Is it still a retcon if they don't make any attempt resolve conflicts with the previous story?So basically the new reboot series is so incomprehensible that the second one is already necessitating a major retcon in the third?
Is it still a retcon if they don't make any attempt resolve conflicts with the previous story?
Damn. There is a butt load of writing jargon. But back on point, that's essentially an oxymoron isn't it?Canon discontinuity.
http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/CanonDiscontinuity
Damn. There is a butt load of writing jargon. But back on point, that's essentially an oxymoron isn't it?